36 B.L.R. (2d) 108‚ 32 R.F.L. (4th) 209‚ 14 R.P.R. (3d) 5‚ 74 A.C.W.S. (3d) 952 Juliana Folia (The Plaintiff) transferred property to Maria and Hubert Trelinski (The Defendants)‚ her daughter and son-in-law. In exchange‚ the defendants promised the plaintiff could live with them‚ with the provision of food and care. Eventually‚ the defendants stopped providing her with food and asked the plaintiff to leave the house. When the case was brought forward in court‚ there was uncertainty with regards to
Premium Defendant Contract Plaintiff
adviser of the plaintiff‚ Marciana Canon and about the same time‚ Felisa Nepomuceno‚ the other plaintiff‚ had an unsecured debt due her of 500 pesos from one Marcelo Leaño. The debtor proposed to give her a deed of conditional sale to a certain tract of land in consideration of 2‚000 pesos‚ she to be credited with 500 pesos on the purchase price and that to advance the balance of 1‚500 pesos; that knowing that the defendant had in his hands that amount of money‚ the property of her co-plaintiff‚ Marciana
Premium Plaintiff Defendant Complaint
) Plaintiff. ) ) ) v. ) ) ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES‚ INC.‚ ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY Pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and any applicable Local Rules of the United State District Court for the Northern District of Illinois‚ Defendant‚ by its counsel‚ moves this court for the entry of an order compelling the Plaintiff to fully
Premium United States Civil procedure Lawyer
TITLE OF THE CASE Gilford Motor Co. vs. Horne(1933)1Ch. 935 FACTS OF THE CASE Mr EB Horne was formerly a managing director of the Gilford Motor Co Ltd. He agreed in writing (clause 9) to not solicit customers of the company when he left employment. Then he was fired. He set up his own business and undercut their prices. Then he got legal advice saying that he was probably acting in breach of contract. So he set up a company‚ JM Horne & Co Ltd‚ in which his wife and a friend called Mr Howard were
Premium Appeal Contract Court
Sivapakiam Krishnan (H. M. J. Shaharom & K. S. Wee) for the plaintiff Ng Chew Hor (Ng. Fan & Associates) for the fourth defendant Vernon Ong Lam Kiat‚ JC GROUNDS OF JUDGMENT Affin Bank Berhad (the plaintiff) is suing Kumarasamy A/L Nadarajah (the 4th defendant) is on a guarantee for the sum of RM15‚550‚000.00 together with interests at 3.25% per annum above the Base Lending Rate on monthly rests from 1.2.2005 and costs. At the trial the plaintiff called Zakaria Bin Wan Saleh (PW1) a bank officer; the
Premium Contract Legal terms Bank
us/court/R23_Orders/AppellateCourt/2013/5thDistrict/5110573_R23.pdf Part Three Facts Plaintiff‚ Sally Sanders filed a complaint in the circuit court of Williams County against defendant‚ Fred Williams. Sanders claimed that Williams trespassed on a strip of land where their properties meet. Williams counterclaimed to allege adverse possession. After a bench trial‚ the defendant was given a judgment in favor of him. The plaintiff filed an appeal based on the fact that the defendant did
Premium Plaintiff Pleading Court
Scenario The State of Confusion enacted a statute requiring all trucks and towing trailers that use its highways to use a B-type truck hitch. This hitch is manufactured by only one manufacturer in Confusion. The result of this statutory requirement is that any trucker who wants to drive through Confusion must stop and have the new hitch installed‚ or detour around the State of Confusion. The federal government has no regulations concerning these truck hitches. Tanya Trucker‚ who owns a trucking
Premium Jury Law Commerce Clause
may revoke it at any time before acceptance. Furthermore‚ one of the conditions that automatically revoke the proposal is the lapse of time either specified or reasonable time limits. As in the above case the court accepted and judged against the plaintiff because no specific time was prescribed by the company and they did not communicated their
Premium Proposal Judge Proposals
The plaintiff‚ Donald Bradshaw‚ was seriously injured in an automobile accident. During this time‚ he was enrolled as a sophomore at Delaware Valley College and had been attending his class picnic. At the end of the picnic‚ he left as a passenger in Bruce Rawlings vehicle. Shortly after departure‚ Rawlings crashed his vehicle into a parked vehicle. Due to this collision‚ Bradshaw suffered serious injuries including a cervical fracture which caused quadriplegic paralysis. The plaintiffs alleged
Premium Alcoholic beverage Plaintiff University
Durando and Gustave Dotoli v. Nutley Sun and North Jersey Media Group‚ Inc.‚ the Plaintiffs failed to prove the Nutley Sun meant to cast a false light on their charges filed by the SEC. 209 N.J. 235 (2011). Citing the two Plaintiffs were being charged with criminal activity and not arrested‚ Nutley Sun accidently misreported the facts as the opposite. The courts did find for the defendants; as the headline claiming the Plaintiffs were arrested was not done with malice intent nor‚ what the newspaper truly
Premium Blog Plaintiff Defendant