Positivism is a philosophy that stated that the only authentic knowledge is scientific knowledge‚ and that such knowledge can only come from positive affirmation of theories through strict scientific method. The main thrust of the positivist research tends to follow certain scientific and measurable methods to conduct a research. A positivist approach is one that is considered objective‚ detached and if I may put that way‚ structured by the researcher’s views who test a hypothesis. It is usually
Free Scientific method Sociology
Marxian vs. Positivism Perspectives Crime and deviance are issues that dominate the public’s imagination; the study of which involves a number of contributing disciplines‚ criminology‚ statistics‚ psychology‚ biology to name a few but the largest contributor is sociology. There have been major changes in the way Sociologists perceive and study deviance over the years. In this essay the author will briefly compare and contrast the perspectives of Marxian and Positivism as they relate to the issues
Premium Karl Marx Capitalism Marxism
our understanding of methodology Positivism is a key concept in Sociology. It is also known to some as the scientist ideology. It is essentially the belief that the social world can be studied in the identical way that one may study the natural world‚ so it can be studied scientifically. The main opposition to this concept of sociology is the interpretive approach. They tend to stress the differences between the natural world and the social world. Positivism came about during the 1800s‚ during
Free Sociology Scientific method Social sciences
CHAPTER XIV Logical Empiricism There are many strange sentences that men use. Compare these two: (1) Wheat is a major crop in Kansas‚ and (2) the fountain of youth is located in Kansas. Each has a subject‚ a verb‚ and a predicate. The first sentence is regarded as true in a matter-of-fact way. The second one may bring a smile or wrinkle to your face. Why the two reactions? Why is one regarded as true and the other as fiction? How can we speak of the non-existent in the same way as
Premium Metaphysics
Fordham Law Review by an authorized administrator of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information‚ please contact tmelnick@law.fordham.edu. ARE CONSTITUTIONAL NORMS LEGAL NORMS? Jeremy Waldron* I. Modem legal positivism prides itself on the clear distinction it draws between legal and nonlegal norms. But how are we supposed to tell whether a given norm practiced and prevalent among the powerful in a society governed by law is actually one of its laws‚ part of its
Premium United States Constitution Law Constitution
Researchers have tried to unravel the mystery of people committing crimes. Theories of thought have been used to explain the reason why people indulge in crime. The classical theory sates that crime is at the privilege of the individual. It also goes ahead to state that human beings are rational and make decisions freely‚ with a good understanding of its consequences. There is also the biological theory which believes that the major determinants of an individual’s behaviour are
Premium Sociology Criminology Crime
describe the rule of recognition in detail describe what Hart calls ‘the necessary and sufficient conditions of the existence of a legal system’ explain the significance of the rule of recognition for Hart for establishing his particular form of legal positivism discuss critically Hart’s claim that the rule of recognition is identified as ‘a matter of fact’ outline the main arguments put by Dworkin in his criticism of the rule of recognition theory express your own opinion about the ‘ultimate’ criteria
Premium Law Jurisprudence Common law
centuries. It seems that the biggest proportion of this debate has been sparked by the emergence of legal positivism and utilitarianism from writers such as Hobbes‚ John Austin‚ and H.L.A Hart. Before this train of thought‚ morality in law was seen as a key necessity and was left to a great extent unopposed; arguably until Hobbes revolutionised the field of jurisprudence with his theories of legal positivism and utilitarianism. This way of thinking was further bolstered by the writings of Austin‚ Hart and
Premium Jurisprudence Morality Law
“Philosophy of Language: Paved way for a better Development Communicator” One concept discussed in Philosophy 1 that I think is particularly applicable to my course – Bachelor of Science Development Communication‚ is the ‘Philosophy of Language.’ I have chosen this concept because we all know that philosophy of language is concerned on the problem: “When we say something‚ it must be meaningful. How then can we know if statements are meaningful or not?” While the Development Communication
Premium Philosophy of language
Austin‚ Hart and Kelson on Sanction as an integral part of law The term “sanction” is derived from Roman law. Sanction was originally that part of the statute which established a penalty or made other provisions for its enforcement. In the ordinary sense‚ the term sanction means mere penalty It can also be some motivating force or encouragement for the purpose of better performance and execution of laws. Meaning The term “sanction” is derived from Roman law. Sanction was originally that part
Premium Law Jurisprudence Ronald Dworkin