Critique – “How Customers Can Rally Your Troops: End users can energize your workforce far better than your managers can” Table of content Introduction Body Introduction This is a critique about a research article that is called “How Customers Can Rally Your Troops: End users can energize your workforce far better than your managers can”. The author of this research article is “Adam M. Grant” and he is a management professor at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School. This research
Premium Research Academic publishing Harvard Business School
In Hobbes’ "Leviathan"‚ we spoke about how he viewed primal humans as being in a "state of war/nature." Although this was hypothetical‚ I do agree with it to be somewhat true. Back in a time of humans with no structure or agreement socially of norms or folkways‚ it probably made life confusing and unpredictable. I believe that in that particular state of nature‚ fearing death was probably equal to the need to kill/defend. It is hard for me to believe that at some point humans actually began to
Premium Thought Human
man has basic moral principles that captures participation in the rational order of creation and freely build his daily live. On the other hand‚ Hobbes believes that the existence of society‚ political power‚ laws‚ and institutions is artificial; the truly natural‚ fundamental truth‚ the starting point of systematic construction‚ is the individual. Hobbes says that the man calls good and evil to what he subjectively finds pleasant or annoying‚ respectively. It Advocates‚ consequently‚ a radical nominalism
Premium Morality Religion Ethics
Thomas Hobbes leviathan‚ the sea monster is presented as the absolute sovereign. He rules the people that form his being. All the people of that state are looking up to him in the image as to express their submission and acceptance of the social contract to be ruled. In the front piece‚ the leviathan holds two objects in his hand which are a crosier and a sword. A crosier in Christianity is a symbol of the governing office of the bishop or apostle. Here‚ one can assume that what Hobbes meant by
Premium Thomas Hobbes Political philosophy State of nature
Jessica Thomas Friday April 26‚ 2013 Machiavelli and Hobbes understood the natural state of the world to be conflict. How does this shape their understanding of human beings‚ politics‚ ethics‚ and morality? Does this idea and itself towards liberal or conservative ideas? Explain. Machiavelli’s understanding of the natural state of the world to be conflict causes him to look and access the world differently than others. His understanding of the natural state of the world bleeds over into
Premium Political philosophy Thomas Hobbes Religion
domination of the strongest. From this mode justifies the birth of government the great Leviathan. On the contrary‚ Socrates provides different values such as virtue and introspective analysis as the main philosophical guide to run a government. Hobbes seeks to show that a community as such is a
Premium Political philosophy Plato Social contract
Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher who was lived from 1588-1679. He attended Oxford University where he studied classics. His occupation was a tutor‚ but he also traveled around Europe to meet with scientists and to study different forms of government. He became interested in why people allowed themselves to be ruled‚ and what would be the best form of government for England. Thomas Hobbes was the first great figure in modern moral philosophy. Hobbes had a pessimistic view of people; he
Premium
manner‚ a comparison of both author’s ideas about the topic of what a polis could be defined could yield with a nice conclusion. After my reading and analysis‚ I can see two different sides that one of them is Weber and Hansen‚ and the other side is Hobbes‚ Berent‚ and Anderson. Hansen disagrees with Berent’s outcomes about how a Greek polis must be defined. In 2002‚ Hansen criticized that Berent used social sciences to define a polis incorrectly that Berent claimed that a Greek “polis was not a state
Premium
On account of the boys failing to implement this basic fundamental into their society it soon results in war. John Locke believed that in order for a government in prosper‚ it is necessary to bring down the government when it does not protect the rights of citizens. Locke believed that a government is based upon the bond of trust between the people and their authority. The people gave up their freedom‚ and in turn‚ they expect the authority
Premium Political philosophy Jean-Jacques Rousseau
What do Plato‚ Descartes‚ and Hobbes contribute to the question "how do we know what is true‚ and what is false?" In the allegory of the cave‚ Plato views the sunlight as the truth‚ and the shadows in the cave as being false‚ and his contribution to the question "how can we tell what is true‚ and what is false" is that we have no way of knowing what is true‚ and what is false‚ until we have experienced them both‚ and can compare the two. I think that Plato is trying to say that society
Premium Truth Epistemology Plato