1. Which of the following standards of thinking relates to how one might verify the truth of a statement or claim? (Points :1) Clarity Relevance Depth Accuracy Breadth Question 2. 2. Although Marquis had been working on research for a year‚ he listened to the other people at his company as they presented different conclusions after his presentation and examined their ideas in the hope of finding out new information. Marquis displayed which
Premium Logical fallacies Fallacy
slanted in any way? (at least 3 +) 7. Are there any logical fallacies (pp. 394-397) in the argument? (you need to find at least 6+ fallacies). You need to identify which sentences in the story are fallacies and specify which fallacy (or fallacies) they violate. For example: “If we cut down on the number of legacy admissions‚ what would happen to the college budget? We might not even be able to keep things running!” Slippery Slope 8. Is there anything important being left out of the presentation
Premium Critical thinking Fallacy Argument
Human lifespan is obviously priority and most importance in recent years. Huge number of scientists and medical doctors has tried to extend human life to live longer. Well-known ‘Genome-project’ is one of these efforts. In the point of view on life extension‚ euthanasia is undoubtedly one of controversial issue in modern society. The conflict is driven by the opinion gap whether accept the notion of euthanasia or should not be allowed. Obviously‚ in the past‚ there were few concerns toward human
Premium Euthanasia Medical ethics Religion
Name _Jordan Peterson___________ Critical Thinking Week 2 Homework (50 pts) 1. (12 pts.) Label each definition with the appropriate name of the fallacy from the following list. (Note there will be two fallacy names that are not used.) Ad hominem/attacking the person | Ad ignorantiam/appeal to ignorance | Ad populum/appeal to the people | Ad misercordiam/appeal to pity | Begging the Question/Circular Reasoning | Equivocation | Red Herring | Straw Man | A. Sliding from one
Premium Critical thinking Fallacy
bad. Avoiding Bad Arguments 1. Begging the question- is the fallacy of arguing in a circle that is trying to use a statement as both a premise in an argument and the conclusion of that argument. 2. Equivocation- assigns two different meanings to the same term in an argument. 3. Appeal to authority- the fallacy of relying on the opinion of someone thought to be an expert who is not. 4. Slippery slope- the fallacy of using dubious premises to argue that doing a particular action
Premium Logic Argument Critical thinking
Part 2 – Moral Reasoning‚ Review Questions Review Questions 1. What is the difference between persuasion and argument? There are several differences between persuasion and argument. Persuasion is based on an individual’s opinion while an argument is based on presenting facts to support their position. Persuasion weighs heavily on emotions versus argument is very logic driven. 2. What is a deductive argument? An inductive argument? A deductive argument is intended to be a guarantee
Premium Logic Argument Reasoning
Jesse James Kalmus Persuasion/Civic Engagement Fall 2014 Fallacy Case Study The second I started looking I could easily find logical fallacies through media. From television series‚political debates and sources like Fox News and CNN you could easily spot the concepts we talked about in class and in our reading. The first clip is from a Seinfeld episode. My mother and I have seen about every episode. Elaine is getting her phone reconnected but the phone company is giving her a new number with
Premium Critical thinking Fallacy Logical fallacies
Ghosts Real or Not? As technology demands more from human existence‚ many interpretations of different phenomenons are misunderstood. The world is filled with many misunderstood paradoxes that makes us uncomfortable but they still exist in dark places. To further expand the topic‚ ghosts are spirits that still need evidence to make their existence. In an article‚ Evidence Does Not Currently Support the Existence of Ghosts by Benjamin Radford published in 2013‚ speaks of antagonistic credibility on
Premium Ghost Paranormal Science
BCOM/275 Sample Final Examination This Sample Examination represents the Final Examination that students complete in Week Five. As in the following Sample Examination‚ the Final Examination includes questions that assess the course objectives. Both the Sample Examination and the Final Examination include five questions per course objective. Refer to the questions in the following Sample Examination to represent the type of questions in the Final Examination. Refer to the weekly readings and
Premium Rhetoric Communication Fallacy
there is only one possible person‚ Kane‚ to fix the State. Some examples of a fallacy are apparent in the speech also. One example is when Kane states he is in this campaign “with one purpose only: to point out and make public the dishonesty‚ the downright villainy of Boss Jim W. Gettys’ political machine.” This could be considered scapegoating as he is saying that Jim Gettys is the problem. Another example of a fallacy in this speech is where Kane implies that no one will take care of
Premium Critical thinking Logic Rhetoric