The articles “The Stanford Prison Experiment” written by Philip G. Zimbardo and “The My Lai Massacre: A Military Crime of Obedience” composed by Herbert C. Kelman and V. Lee Hamilton both focus on the effects of power. In which the subjects have been ordered to follow something by superiors. In the experiment the original group of subjects are divided into the role of guards‚ and inmates. The massacre‚ however‚ was not an experiment but was the result of an order issued by a higher ranking official
Premium Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Philip Zimbardo
out of those 70 candidates 24 of them were sorted out through mental diseases‚ drug abuse‚ and psychological issues. With a pay of $15/a day‚ he divided the candidates‚ 9 guards and 9 prisoners. He constructed the basement floor at Stanford into a correctional facility taking the doors off hinges and replacing them with steel door with bars and cell numbers. Each prisoner was stripped and searched and sprayed‚ the same way as if they were going to a real prison. Each prisoner was given robes to wear
Premium Prison Stanford prison experiment The Prisoner
Stanford Prison Experiment SPE The Stanford Prison Experiment has given a strong hint about how influential the society and situation can be. The experiment was originally designed to test whether the tension in prison was a cause of inmates’ inherently flawed personality; however‚ the result has revealed that any healthy human being can be transformed into a violent figure after being assigned a specific role and put in a designed situation. Indeed‚ the result was shocking‚ and the procedure
Premium Stanford prison experiment Prison Milgram experiment
the Stanford Prison Experiment‚ Philip Zimbardo states people change with they are given “power without oversight” (Zimbardo‚ The Psychology of Evil‚ TedTalk). Though the students were considered “good apples‚” the combination of situation and the system caused the guards to lose their identities and to abuse their power in inhumane ways. The results of the experiment were derived many observations and conclusions about the subjects; however‚ Zimbardo’s switch between running the experiment
Premium Stanford prison experiment Philip Zimbardo Milgram experiment
Investigation: The Stanford prison experiment was originally intended to run for a fortnight. However it lasted only 6 days and was ended earlier than initially planned due to the terrible living conditions and psychological problems that developed as the ‘inmates’ and ‘guards’ interacted.. The experiment was run by Philip Zimbardo‚ Craig Haney‚ David Jaffe‚ and W. Curtis Banks. The test subjects were young male college students that were chosen from 75 volunteers. The volunteers had replied to
Premium Stanford prison experiment Prison Milgram experiment
Can good‚ moral‚ and virtuous people be pushed to do bad things? This article seeks to compare an experiment done in 1971 to a real life military situation during wartime. The article also tries to link the experiment to another horrible act done by someone suffering from various mental illnesses with extremely mixed results. Is there a correlation between these three events as far as the mental states of the participants? The article starts off telling the story of Sergeant John M Russell taking
Premium Psychology Suicide Vietnam War
Stanford Prison Experiment Questions The effects of living in a prison cell with no outer contact is very abysmal. People tend to get very friendly with their prison mates and they even plan and talk out many ideas of breaking out of prison. They also tend to feel achy and horrible inside because of lack of sunlight and not much physical activity is being pursued during time in a cell. Finally‚ they also feel so closed in and hurt inside that they start thinking that suicide or death is a better
Premium Prison Stanford prison experiment
The Stanford prison experiment was organized by three psychologists from Stanford University with a purpose is to observe the behavior between guards and prisoners in a simulated environment‚ and whether or not a prison environment aided in rehabilitating inmates‚ or increased the possibility of violent behavior. Formal hypotheses were developed describing that an assignment to either role of prisoner or guard would result in significantly different reactions on behavioral measures of interaction
Premium Stanford prison experiment Prison Milgram experiment
An Ethical Analysis of the Stanford Prison Experiment The Stanford Prison Experiment‚ although very fascinating and revealing of human nature‚ raises ethical questions regarding the methods used by Zimbardo and his research team. Although it is important from a research standpoint to be able to conduct experiments that will provide real‚ unmolested data‚ there must be a line that defines when research or an experiment becomes unethical‚ whether wholly or partially – research should not go on simply
Premium
The Abu Ghirab prison was the most horrific‚ brutal and dehumanizing thing I have even come across. The level of suffering the inmates experienced words cannot express how terrifying it is. There were male as well as female and even worst‚ children was in that dreadful place. They were treated worse than animals in my opinion‚ I cannot see in no one lives they should have to encounter such gruesome experience. The Stanford prison experiment was conducted on August 14th to 20th‚ 1971.The team of researchers
Premium Prison Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment