po.ssible to be sitnultaneously globally efficient and locally responsive‚ this does not on its own make a multinational corporation (MNC) successful. Instead‚ many authors have identified innovation as one key to corporate success (Bartlett and Ghoshal‚ 1989; Hedlund and Rolander‚ 1990; Porter‚ 198. ’S; Pucik. 1992). The ideas of competitive strategies aitiiing at responsiveness‚ efficiency and innovation have been applied to the realm of internalional hutnan resource management {IHRM). A number
Premium Human resource management Management Multinational corporation
Questions slides 1. What is a multinational (MNE)? A firm with economic operations located in at least two countries. 2. What is exports‚ and what is the difference between MNE activity and exports? Exports are products which are exported from one country to another‚ selling those products to another company. The companies are not located in those ‘host-countries’. MNE activities means that a company is also located in those countries. They produce in those countries and from there‚ they sell
Free Export International trade Arithmetic mean
References: Ghoshal‚ S.‚ Lampel‚ J.‚ Mintzberg‚ H.‚ & Quinn‚ J.B. (2003). The Strategy Process. Retrieved June 3‚ 2010 from University of Phoenix. Hrebiniak‚ Lawrence. Making Strategy Work: Overcoming the Obstacles to Effective Execution. (2008). Retrieved on June
Premium Management Leadership Corporate governance
Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies (CAHRS) CAHRS Working Paper Series Cornell University ILR School Year 2005 A Resource-Based View Of International Human Resources: Toward A Framework of Integrative and Creative Capabilities Shad S. Morris Cornell University Scott A. Snell Cornell University Patrick M. Wright Cornell University This paper is posted at DigitalCommons@ILR. http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cahrswp/284 CAHRS at Cornell University 187 Ives Hall Ithaca
Premium Human resource management Management Knowledge management
Schweiger‚ D.M.‚ Csiszar‚ N.K. & Napier‚ N.K. (1993). Implementing international mergers and acquisitions [2] Wikipedia‚ Mittal Steel Company. Retrieved December 5th‚ 2010 from http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Mittal_Steel_Company [3] Piramal‚ Gita & Ghoshal‚ Sumantra (2005). The extraordinary story of Mittal Steel. Retrieved December 5th‚ 2010 from http://www.rediff.com/money/2005/mar/17mittal.htm [4] Gupta‚ A. K. The extraordinary story of Mittal Steel (Powerpoint). Retrieved December 5th‚ 2010 from http://www
Premium Steel Mittal Steel Company
Configurations of Strategy and Structure in Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations Author(s): Julian M. Birkinshaw and Allen J. Morrison Source: Journal of International Business Studies‚ Vol. 26‚ No. 4 (4th Qtr.‚ 1995)‚ pp. 729-753 Published by: Palgrave Macmillan Journals Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/155297 . Accessed: 06/04/2013 06:34 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use‚ available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms
Premium Hierarchy Subsidiary Multinational corporation
managing the transnational: the new organizational challenge. In: Porter‚ M.‚ (Ed.)‚ Competition in global industries Bartlett‚ C.‚ Ghoshal‚ S.‚ 1992. What is a global manager? Harvard Business Rev Sept–Oct‚ 124–132. Bartlett‚ C.‚ Ghoshal‚ S.‚ 1994. Changing the role of top management: beyond strategy to purpose. Harvard Business Rev 72 (6)‚ 79–88. Bartlett‚ C.‚ Ghoshal‚ S.‚ 1995. Changing the role of top management: beyond structure to purpose. Harvard Business Rev 73 (4)‚ 86–96. artmess‚ A.‚ Cerny
Premium Developed country Knowledge Management
LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT: A REVIEW IN CONTEXT David V. Day* The Pennsylvania State University Interest in leadership development is strong‚ especially among practitioners. Nonetheless‚ there is conceptual confusion regarding distinctions between leader and leadership development‚ as well as disconnection between the practice of leadership development and its scientific foundation. The present review examines the field of leadership development through three contextual lenses: (1) understanding the
Premium Leadership Management Sociology
105-115. Ferraro‚ F.‚ Pfeffer‚ J.‚ & Sutton‚ R. L. (2005). Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review‚ 30. 8-24. Ghoshal‚ S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education‚ 4‚ 75-91. Ghoshal‚ S. & Moran‚ P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review‚ 21‚ 13-47. Hackman‚ J. R.‚ & Oldham‚ G. R. (1976). Motivation
Premium Motivation
1. Introduction Social responsibility of business has been a subject of intense controversy and interest over the past four decades (Jamali 2008). The purpose of this paper is to critically analyze the two different views of social responsibility of business among scholars and business practitioners. The first is the shareholders view of Milton Friedman and another one is the stakeholder view of Bob Dudley‚ Group Chief Executive of BP Corporation. I will outline key arguments and point out drawbacks
Premium Corporate social responsibility Business ethics Social responsibility