NOVARTIS CASE STUDY BRIEF HISTORY OF THE CASE: Novartis is a Swiss drug maker which produces and sells an anti cancer drug called ‘Glivec’. It had filed an appeal before the Honorable Supreme court of India for the grant of patent of the same. The appellant had first filed an application for patent in Chennai Patent office on July 17‚ 1998. The appeal was filed for grant of patent for Imatinib Mesylate in beta crystalline form which they claimed to be an invention on the following grounds:
Premium Patent Pharmacology Invention
Korematsu V. United States was a court case during the time of World War II. After the bombing of Pearl Harbor‚ people of Japanese descent were considered threats. As a result‚ Franklin Roosevelt issued the Executive Order 9066 on February 19‚ 1942. This Order demanded that each and every person of Japanese descent be moved to internment camps‚ regardless of citizenship. Fred Korematsu‚ a Japanese American citizen‚ refused to leave his home to go to the internment camp. Therefore‚ he was convicted
Premium United States World War II President of the United States
Texas to have the complicated Supreme Court system that it has today. The Supreme Court System is used to take on both civil cases and criminal cases‚ and this is why it must be separated into two distinct branches. The first branch of the State Court of Texas is the Texas Supreme Court. This court according to the website for Supreme Court Laws (2017)‚ the Texas Supreme Court “hears and administers decisions concerning civil cases.” According to Nolo.com (2017)‚ a civil case is a “noncriminal lawsuit
Premium Criminal law Supreme Court of the United States Court
Issues: 1. SALN 2. Which of the two court is superior in the impeachment case the Supreme Court or the Impeachment Court 3. Cold Neutrality of Impartial Judges Facts: First and foremost regarding the SALN of Chief Justice Corona the prosecution claims that CJ Corona has 45 properties. However they were able to present only 21 properties which in his account named after him and his family. According to a key member of the President Aquino’s Cabinet the government
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Chief Justice of the United States United States Congress
Roe vs. Wade Roe vs. Wade is a very well-known court case about abortion in the United States. It broke the news in 1969 when a divorced‚ poverty stricken‚ high school dropout‚ Norma McCorvey‚ desired for an abortion.1 In the state of Texas during this time‚ abortion was prohibited unless it jeopardized a woman’s health. So‚ Norma decided to have her child and set the child up for adoption. Then‚ she met Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee. Dictating on whether Texas’ Law was constitutional‚ the
Premium Roe v. Wade Supreme Court of the United States Abortion
Dred Scott vs Sanford was a very important political case and was one of the first case towards equal rights for everybody. Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri and he sued the state of Missouri for his freedom. In this time Missouri was a free state and therefore he stated that he could be free from slavery. Although he was free‚ the state of Missouri considered him property and could not be taken away from his owner. Not to mention Minorities in this time we’re not considered citizens and couldn’t
Premium African American Black people American Civil War
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court of the land. “Supreme Court decisions help shape the law of the land” (Winter‚ 2009). The Supreme Court of the United States is composed of 9 Justices. The United States Supreme Court ensures that the President of the United States‚ Congress‚ and state governments are adhering to the articles of the United States Constitution. “The Supreme Court has original‚ or trial‚ jurisdiction only in rare instances (set forth in Article III‚ Section2
Premium Supreme Court of the United States
before” he argued that it was the Court that had changed its ideologies‚ not himself. To answer this our group looked into the influences and effects that played a role in justice preferences and case outcomes‚ so we decided to look at the ideological effects of individual justices on the Court itself. From that framed core interest‚ we came up with a research question of‚ “In the confines of the Burger Court (1969-1986)‚ do the justices of the United States Supreme Court drift ideologically over their
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Chief Justice of the United States Roe v. Wade
Congress and the states should pass an amendment that allows a staggered 18-year term limit on the tenure of the Supreme Court justices. Under this proposal‚ each justice would serve for 18 years‚ and the terms would be established so that there is a vacancy every two years. The vacancies would be on the first and third years of the presidential term. This would allow enough time so that the senate would pass somebody through and the president would not be denied one of his two appointees. The terms
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
Question : One should always use a capital “C” for “court.” Student Answer: True False Comments: Question 2. Question : When the U.S. Supreme Court‚ in its discretion‚ decides to take a case‚ it is said that the Court has: Student Answer: acted in conference certified the case granted certiorari acted en banc Comments: Question 3. Question : Any case decided by the highest court in a state may be reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court. Student Answer: True False Comments:
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States United States Congress