Tanglewood Case 5: Disparate Impact Analysis Recruitment and Selection HRM 450 Current Needs Assessment Tanglewood prides itself on encouragement of diversity in the workplace. All hiring and promotion decisions should be made on the basis of character and quality of work. The ensuing lawsuit brings about a need to analyze Tanglewood’s selection strategies to ensure these practices are not hindering the promotion of diversity. In order to do this‚ it is necessary to study the flow and
Premium Discrimination African American Racism
Disparate Impact Analysis a. Several positions have shown have displayed Disparate Impact. The Shift Leader position for hires is the first position below 80% for both nonwhite and African Americans hires. Disparate impact was prevalent in the department manager position for African Americans. The data also confirms disparate impact Assistant Store manager as well as Store manager. Although disparate impact is prevalent in several management positions‚ this does not mean discrimination is taking
Premium Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Discrimination Racism
Disparate Impact In evaluating the recruiting and hiring practices of Tanglewood for a potential disparate impact claim‚ we need to look at the historical flow and concentration statistics to see if there is an adverse impact possibility. A flow statistic is when we analyze applicants to actual people selected to be hired. The concentration statistic‚ analyzes the distribution of employees in the organization to provide a proportion statistic in determining disparate impact. We will look at the
Premium Employment Affirmative action Minority group
Stephanie Smalls MGT 210 Tanglewood Case #5 1a. Yes‚ the evidence does prove that disparate impact discrimination is present. Historical Hiring and Promotion Data: Applicant Flows Occupational category Total White* Total Non-White African- American* Store Associates External hires Applicants 18023 15193 2830 595 Hires 4145 3464 681 143 Selection ratio 23.00% 22.80% 24.06% 1.05 24.03% 1.05 Shift leader External hires Applicants
Premium Discrimination Minority group Management
Assignment 1-5 Robert Driscoll Franklin University Assignment 1-5 Reviewing the Tanglewoods staffing practices I have found that there is little disparity involved at the entry levels. Furthermore‚ it is shown that of all applicants applying for all job positions had very minute disparity in the company’s hiring characteristics. Each of the three groups (white‚ non-white‚ and African American) had a selection rate of 21%. With the statistical evidence of Tanglewoods staffing practices‚ there
Premium African American Employment Racism
Case 5 Proposal Tanglewood prides itself on encouragement of diversity in the workplace. All hiring and promotion decisions should be made on the basis of character and quality of work. The ensuing lawsuit brings about a need to analyze Tanglewood’s selection strategies to ensure these practices are not hindering the promotion of diversity. The Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (UGESP) requires that all organizations keep records that will allow for calculation and comparison
Premium Employment
promotions‚ harassment‚ training‚ wages‚ and benefits. Affirmative action is intended to promote the opportunities of the protected classes within a society to give them equal access to that of the privileged majority population. Tactics of Tanglewoods for recruiting. Recruiting: The typical recruiting and hiring practices for Northern California are based on a model that has been successful in finding qualified‚ energetic salespeople and talented managers. When openings occur‚ there is a two-pronged
Premium Minority group Employment Recruitment
I chose to reflect on the concept of Disparate Impact. I chose this subject because this is an issue that I frequently confront on my assessments due to the variety of racial‚ ethnic‚ socioeconomic and gender backgrounds of my students. As the makeup of my students has evolved‚ I have taken notice of the differences in scores between the students from different backgrounds. This difference has always caused me some concern but I have had a difficult time confronting it due to the subject matter
Premium Education Learning Teacher
Brian La Hargoue Title VII Paper IV. Disparate impact discrimination and disparate treatment discrimination Guerin (n.d.) states‚ “Disparate impact is a way to provide employment discrimination based on the effect of an employment policy or practice rather than the intent behind it.” Disparate impact has neutral policies and practices that apply to not only unintentional discrimination‚ but also intentional discrimination. When trying to prove a disparate impact case‚ there are things an employee must
Premium Law United States Disability
Disparate Impact/Disparate Treatment The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission protects employees when they feel they are being discriminated against. This discrimination can be direct and overt or subtle and unintentional. The two distinctions for these forms of discrimination are Disparate Treatment and Disparate Impact. This paper will present one case study for each form of discrimination‚ the ruling of the cases‚ and how the cases affect the authors work environment at Novellus Systems
Premium Discrimination Employment Law