AAEE 2012 CONFERENCE Melbourne‚ Australia www.aaee.com.au/conferences/2012/ Analysis of Competitiveness of Batangas State University College of Engineering Using Porter’s Five Competitive Forces Model Tirso A. Ronquillo‚ Ph.D. Batangas State University‚ Philippines taronquillo@yahoo.com BACKGROUND There are a number of models and frameworks used in the analyses of competitiveness of engineering universities in the context of internationalization and globalization. Although much can
Premium Strategic management Higher education Porter five forces analysis
A Five Forces Analysis of Allscripts‚ An Electronic Health Records (EHR) technology company Robert A. Brinker GBA 530 – Management Information Systems Professor Billie Whitfield February 6‚ 2012 The purpose of this paper is to identify competitive forces at work based on Michael Porter’s Five Competitive Forces from his Competitive Analysis Model (McNurlin‚ 2009) and provide recommendations to Allscripts‚ an electronic health records (EHR) technology company
Premium Electronic health record Health care Medicine
FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Exhibit III-1 Five Forces Affecting Industry Structure ENTRY BARRIERS Economies of scale Proprietary product differences Brand identity Switching costs Capital requirements Access to distribution Absolute cost advantages Proprietary learning curve Access to necessary inputs Proprietary low-cost product design Government policy and international treaties Expected retaliation RIVALRY DETERMINANTS Industry Growth Fixed (or storage) costs/value-added Intermittent overcapacity
Premium Barriers to entry Brand Substitute good
Target’s Industry According to Michael Porter’s five forces model‚ the Target brand proves to be capable of making a high profit. Target’s industry faces several barriers to entry. First‚ Target and its current nation-wide competitors enjoy significant economies of scale. Purchasing inputs in bulk enables Target to reduce pricing in their stores. Also Target benefits from brand loyalty with their customer which makes it difficult for competitors to gain customers. Due to its high level of power
Premium Marketing Target Corporation Management
1. 5(+1) Porter‘s forces. | |The threat of substitutes | | |Food retail industry at first seems easy to substitute‚ but in truth the large markets are the ones who state the prices in the market‚ | | |thus for such large chains like Tesco the threat of substitutes is low as due to high demand it manages to offer high quality products at | | |low costs. Moreover
Premium Retailing Marketing Cost
Using Porter’s Five Force analysis to assess this industry‚ one notices that first of all the internal rivalry would be intense between us and Empire Plastics and both companies (and others) would try to severely underprice the other’s offer. There would be considerable buyer power since the target customers would be giant supermarket chains and there is little customer diversity‚ with a very few customers dictating who they buy from and even what price they pay. In addition there would be a lot
Premium Barriers to entry Marketing Investment
Sales Force In the beginning of the simulation‚ Allround started with 135 members of the sale force. A well equip and knowledgeable sales force can also help a company deliver more value to the customer (Winer & Dhar‚ 2016). The decision to add or contract the sale force was based on the simulation reports and the competitor’s sale force. From the beginning of the simulation‚ we came to a realization that sale force plays a pivotal part of the simulation‚ having the right amount of sale person per
Premium Marketing Price Pricing
For the analysis of GM and its environment Porter’s Five Forces will be used. This tool is primarily used to analyze the competitive environment in terms of five main categories; the threat of new entrants‚ bargaining power of both supplier and buyers‚ threat of substitute products and how intense the current rivalry is among existing competitors. In each of the five categories there are conditions/ sources that further provide insight to each; they will be analyzed in terms the car industry. This
Premium General Motors Renault Automotive industry
Notes on Industry Competitiveness [Using Porter’s ‘five forces’ model] This is a short supplemental note to Porter’s article “How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy”. This material is covered in Chapter 3 of your book. In general‚ when analyzing industry competitiveness‚ start by identifying your focal industry. This goes at the center of the five forces picture. When thinking about bargaining power of buyers‚ the buyers are those individuals or firms that buy the finished product of the
Premium Clothing Personal computer Manufacturing
Conclusion of primary research Analysis of primary research 2.0 Introduction 2.1 Profile of manager and business 2.2 Analysis of questionnaire finding 2.3 Conclusion Theory regarding porters 5 forces framework 3.0 Introduction 3.1 Porters five forces diagram 3.2 Analysis of Porters five forces 3.3 Past analysis of Ryanair 3.4 Conclusion Application of SWOT analysis 4.0 Introduction 4.1 SWOT analysis for Ryanair 4.2 SWOT analysis for Aerlingus 4.3 Conclusion Appendices
Premium Management Leadership Airline