"Thomas hobbes vs immanuel kant" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 36 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Better Essays

    Born in 1724‚ Immanuel Kant became an extremely important Prussian philosopher. His parents were poor as he grew up‚ and were part of a strict religious group – a protestant group known as Pietism. When he was sixteen‚ Kant went to university in Prussia and received the equivalent of a doctoral degree by the age of 31. He taught as a professor of logic and mathematics at the university and was an extremely popular lecturer‚ because people wanted to hear what he had to say. He wrote several notable

    Premium Philosophy Immanuel Kant Epistemology

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant Suicide

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages

    her life. In addition to this‚ the killing and suicide appears to be done in order to mitigate further suffering. However‚ if one looks at Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals‚ it is evident that this type of analysis is flawed. According to Kant‚ the rightness or wrongness of an action does not rest upon the particulars of the situation. Therefore‚ if one were to use Kantian ideas‚ Mr. Snelling’s actions cannot be deemed morally right only based on the unique circumstances of his situation

    Premium Death Suicide English-language films

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Duty Ethics Kant

    • 1833 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Kant and Duty Ethics In this paper I will first go into a detailed review of Kant’s second formulation of the first categorical imperative. I will explain in depth what the second formulation means and how Kant came to take on a philosophical position such as this. Next‚ I will describe the two most pertinent and grounded critiques that Feldman has regarding the second formulation. Then I will defend Kant’s formulation from these critiques. Finally I will summarize the above information and conclude

    Premium Categorical imperative Immanuel Kant Deontological ethics

    • 1833 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant Theory and Justice

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Immanuel Kant concerns himself with deontology‚ and as a deontologist‚ he believes that the rightness of an action depends in part on things other than the goodness of its consequences‚ and so‚ actions should be judged based on an intrinsic moral law that says whether the action is right or wrong – period. Kant introduced the Categorical Imperative which is the central philosophy of his theory of morality‚ and an understandable approach to this moral law. It is divided into three formulations. The

    Premium Discrimination Immanuel Kant Morality

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The sublime; Kant & Burke

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages

    distinguished and particular notion of the mathematical sublime by Immanuel Kant. The mathematical sublime is the perception that reason has this superiority over imagination because reason and logic is boundless whereas imagination is limited to what we have personally experienced through our senses. When in the presence of something that embodies the overwhelming magnitude of an idea that we cannot comprehend at first glance (the sublime)‚ Kant believes that reason has the upper hand over the senses. By

    Premium Aesthetics John Milton Logic

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    your own personal compass‚ that lead you to choose what is right. Like a powerful magnetic can change the direction of a compass‚ your morals can be swayed. Right and wrong is never as straightforward as its seems. There will always be a gray area. Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative is when you behave a certain way because that behavior is universal law. It is what is believed to be the right course of action. Cheating on your exam is not categorical imperative because the majority chooses not to

    Premium Philosophy Immanuel Kant Categorical imperative

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    property and freely express myself affect my neighbor’s right to have a safe‚ peaceful place to live? As the layers of these moral problems are uncovered we delve deeper into what rights are‚ and just as importantly‚ who has them and why? Philosopher Immanuel Kant’s believes that all persons have inherent value and he bases his view of human rights off of whether or not the person is capable of making moral judgments and having free will and reason. Just as it has been argued over time what exactly a

    Premium United States Morality Religion

    • 2005 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Friedman Vs. Richard Florida Thomas Friedman’s lecture on his book "The World is Flat"‚ is not only humorous but insightfully clever. Friedman’s lecture breaks down the first three chapters of his book. I found this lecture interesting because studying the field of business you’re instantly introduced to what globalization is but never where it actually began and the advancements it has made over time. Robert Florida’s article "The World is Spiky" expanded and contrasted Friedman’s

    Premium The World Is Flat Economics Economy

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Comparing Hobbes and Locke

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages

    contract theorists Thomas Hobbes and John Locke agree that legitimate government comes only from the mutual consent of those governed. Although both were empiricists‚ the ways by which they came to their conclusions differed wildly‚ and perhaps as a result their views on the means by which society should be governed also conflicted. This paper will briefly address the different conclusions as well as the reasoning that led to them. Written during the English Civil War of 1642-51‚ Hobbes’ Leviathan is

    Free Political philosophy Social contract

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Immanuel Kant ’s Ethics Of Pure Duty In Comparison To John Stuart Mill ’s Utilitarian Ethics Of Justice Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are philosophers who addressed the issues of morality in terms of how moral traditions are formed. Immanuel Kant has presented one viewpoint in The Grounding For The Metaphysics of Morals that is founded on his belief that the worth of man is inherent in his ability to reason. John Stuart Mill holds another opinion as presented in the book‚ Utilitarianism

    Premium Immanuel Kant Ethics Utilitarianism

    • 2746 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
Page 1 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 50