what’s legal or illegal and not to break the law‚ it also helps securing the company from fraudulent or unlawful actions. Assignment 1 primarily deals with key elements of Contract Law. In the assignment main parts of any contract and various types of business contracts will be considered‚ and such topics as „What makes a valid contract?“ will be discussed. Rules of offer and acceptance as well as rules of intention and consideration will be viewed in terms of specific situations. At the same time
Premium Contract Contract law
Essential elements of a valid contract Introduction: In this part of my assignment I will be detailing what the different elements of a valid contract are whilst also linking it in with my own contract. The contract I have decided to use is my mobile phone contract from Vodafone. The offer: In contract law the offer is where a person will accept the invitation‚ for example in my contract the offer would be when I offer to bind into their contract and purchase a mobile phone deal‚ and this
Premium Contract
2nd Assignment: Suggested Answer 1. The legal issue revolving around this case is that whether a valid legally-binding contract has been entered into between David and John‚ and‚ if that is the case‚ whether David is able to sue John for his breach of contract resulting from his sale of the shop to Nancy. In general‚ a legally binding contract is an agreement made between two or more persons‚ by which rights are acquired by one or more to acts or forbearances on the part of the other
Premium Contract Invitation to treat
For a contract to be legally binding all of the following elements must be present. If one or more is absent the contract will be considered invalid or void. The first element of the contract is Offer and Acceptance. For a contract to be considered valid one party (the offer) must make an offer to another party (the offeree). Before an offer is accepted it must be communicated to the offeree. A offer is immediately made into a contract when the offeree accepts the offeror’s tender. An offer can be
Premium Contract Contract law
Ans: Section 2(h) of the Indian Contract Act‚ 1872 defines a contract as an agreement enforceable by law. Section 2(e) defines agreement as "everypromise and every set of promises forming consideration for each other." Section2(b) defines promise in the word: "When the person to whom the proposal ismade signifies his assent thereto‚ the proposal is said to be accepted. A proposalwhen accepted becomes a promise." From the above definition of promise‚ it is obvious that an agreement
Premium Contract
1.1 Explain the importance of the essential elements required for the formation of a valid contract A valid contract is a contract that complies with all the essentials of a contract and is binding and enforceable on all parties (Investorwords‚ n.d). Essential elements of the contract: - Agreement = Offer + Acceptance - Consideration - Intention to create legal relations A. AGREEMENT = OFFER + ACCEPTANCE In order to create a valid contract‚ there must be a ’lawful offer’ by one party
Premium Contract
ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF A VALID CONTRACT: To be enforceable by law an agreement must possess the essential elements of a valid contract as laid down by Sec.10 of Contract Act in the following terms; ‘All agreements are contracts if they are made by the free consent of parties competent to contract‚ for a lawful consideration and with a lawful object‚ and are not hereby expressly declared to be void.’ Following are the conditions for validity of the contract in detail. 1. Offer and Acceptance:
Premium Contract Contract law
Hartly & The Auto Dealer What do you think about this situation? Should parties to a sales contract be able to rescind a contract because of mutual mistake of fact? Why or why not? Did either party act unethically in this case? Why or why not? What application does the UCC have here? Finally‚ in the overall context of contract law‚ are there any winners or losers when a contract is rescinded based on mutual mistake of fact? Why or why not? In my studies of the case‚ I read about
Premium Contract
attempt to identify and explain the four elements of a valid contract‚ explain what the objective theory of contracts is and define and explain how the objective theory of contracts applies to the Unit 3 IP. This paper will also explain why I think the court held that there was not a valid contract in the scenario of the unit 3 IP as well as explain why advertisements are generally considered not to be valid offers. The four elements of a valid contract are: * There must be an agreement in
Premium Contract
ESSENTIALS OF A VALID CONTRACT A valid contract has to have the following essential characteristics: * Proper offer and acceptance An offer to be valid must contain certain conditions such as it must intend to create legal relationship‚ its terms must be certain and unambiguous‚ it must be communicated to the person to whom it is being made. An acceptance to be valid must fulfill certain conditions such as it must be communicated by an authorized person before the offer lapses. *
Premium Contract Contract law