"Views of david hume immanuel kant georg hegel and arthur schopenhauer" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 21 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant And Skepticism

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Is skepticism self-refuting? Immanuel Kant argued that although human knowledge comes from experience‚ nonetheless knowledge must be grounded in some necessary truths. It is hard to see how the existence of logically and metaphysically necessary truths is enough to ground human knowledge. Following Kant’s reasoning‚ there are certain types of knowledge we have no access to. I will argue that Presuppositionalism is more plausible than Kant’s skepticism about certain types of knowledge‚ and that from

    Premium Philosophy Immanuel Kant Logic

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant: Goodness

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant: Goodness The philosopher I used is Immanuel Kant. He was very practical in his thinking of goodness. A quote of his was "I ought‚ therefore I can". His view was good anything is under good will . He believed good will was the primary goodness‚ good in its purest form‚ and that it couldn’t be corrupted. Good feelings and good intentions and actions can be interpreted in different ways; man can corrupt these things into evil...even though it still might be good in that man’s eyes

    Premium Good and evil Philosophy Immanuel Kant

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hume: Necessary Connection

    • 1863 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Jac Brueneman Hume and Kant Hume Essay In David Hume’s masterful argument‚ Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding‚ he addresses the foundation and processes of our epistemology through both empirical and applied epistemology. In this argument he addresses the issue of what‚ exactly‚ necessary causation is‚ its importance to our epistemology‚ and whether or not we are able to truly understand it. While Hume’s argument concerning necessary connection is strong there are flaws in it regarding

    Premium Causality

    • 1863 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    BIOGRAPHY OF GEORG SIMON OHM Georg Simon Ohm (16 March 1787 – 6 July 1854) was a Bavarian (German) physicist and mathematician. As a high school teacher‚ Ohm began his research with the new electrochemical cell‚ invented by Italian scientist Alessandro Volta. Using equipment of his own creation‚ Ohm found that there is a direct proportionality between the potential difference (voltage) applied across a conductor and the resultant electric current. This relationship is known as Ohm’s law. Ohm

    Premium Ohm's law Munich Electrical resistance

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The scottish philosopher David Hume says that there is a great uniformity among the actions of men in all nation and ages‚ and that human nature remains the same. Humes expresses that all men regardless of the time being all have ambition‚ self love‚ vanity‚ friendship‚ generosity‚ and public spirit. Whether it be from the times of the ancient greeks to the present the moral ethics of man never changes. I agree with David Hume because I do believe that things have remained unchanged because it is

    Premium Morality Ethics Philosophy

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant and Rousseau

    • 2384 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Influence of Kant and Rousseau on the Enlightenment The eighteenth century was a time of rapid change and development in the way people viewed humans and their interaction with others in society. Many countries experience revolution and monarchies were overthrow. People began to question the values that were ingrained in society and governments that ruled them. Two of the biggest philosophers of that time were Immanuel Kant and Jean-Jacques Rousseau‚ who both ignite the overthrow of tradition

    Premium Immanuel Kant Age of Enlightenment Jean-Jacques Rousseau

    • 2384 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Georg Simmel‚ in his work “Domination and Freedom”‚ identifies domination as a form of interaction. He claims that both the superordinate and the subordinate parties interact intentionally. By this assumption‚ he concludes that domination never totally kills freedom unless there is a case of physical force executed on subjugated party. The aim of this work is to demonstrate that Simmel’s argument advocating that mentioned interaction is mutually determined is fallacious. Simmel definitely misses

    Premium Sociology Max Weber

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Emmanuel Kant‚ Anthropology from the pragmatic point of view (1798) This text is an extract from the Antropologie from the pragmatic point of view of Kant is about the importance of the power of saying « I » for the human subject. Indeed‚ for Kant‚ this force “raises Man on top of all other living beings”. This power is the founding of the superiority and of the dignity of Man‚ it is thanks to consciousness that Man becomes a moral being‚ in other words a being able to think himself and thus

    Premium Consciousness René Descartes Self-awareness

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    others rights are met. Furthermore‚ in historical context‚ the obligation to the state has been explained by many political philosophers such as‚ Jean Jacques Rousseau‚ Immanuel Kant‚ and David Hume. Rousseau believed in a social contract‚ while Hume had a more pragmatic approach focusing on the usefulness of the state‚ and Kant focused on an individuals moral obligation to the state. Rousseau‚ describes the relationship between the state and a person as contractual‚ thereby explaining the state

    Premium Political philosophy Morality Social contract

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Religion by David Hume is a philosophical piece concerning the existence of God. Arguments for and against the existence of God are portrayed in dialogue through three characters; Demea‚ Cleanthes‚ and Philo. All three agree that God exists‚ but they drastically differ in their opinions of God’s attributes or characteristics‚ and if man can understand God. The characters debate such topics as the design and whether there is more suffering or good in the world. It is a very common view among philosophers

    Premium

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
Page 1 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 50