importance of this concept to the critical evaluation of two pieces of social psychological research. The two pieces of research chosen to illustrate this “Crowds”‚ the focus of which will be the Stanford prison experiment by Zimbardo (1971) and Professors Haslam and Reicher’s (2002) Prison experiment. Dixon and Mahendran (2012). The second piece of research “Bystander intervention” focusing on Darley and Latane’s experimental study on the Kitty Genovese murder and Cherry’s feminist critique. Burr (2012)
Premium Sociology Bystander effect Stanford prison experiment
What do classic studies of social influence (e.g.‚ Asch‚ 1952; Milgram‚ 1974; Zimbardo‚ 1971) tell us about group effects on individual behaviour? Social influence is the effect one person or a group has on the attitudes or behaviour of another. There are several different kinds of social influence. This essay the focuses on conformity - yielding publicly to group pressure‚ and sometimes yielding privately also (e.g. Asch (1951)); also on obedience – behaving as instructed‚ for example Milgram
Premium Milgram experiment Social psychology Stanford prison experiment
Bino Analysis of “Quiet Rage” The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) was a study of the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or prison guard. The experiment was conducted at Stanford University from August 14–20‚ 1971‚ by a team of researchers led by psychology professor Philip Zimbardo. Twenty-four male students across the country out of seventy-five were carefully chosen to take on randomly assigned roles of prisoners and guards in a mock prison situated in the basement of the Stanford psychology
Premium Stanford prison experiment Sociology
internee‚ chosen at random‚ was brought before them and they were told – all 50 of them – to hit her. I remember that out of all of them‚ only three women asked the reason why‚ and only one woman refused to do it‚ which caused her to be thrown into prison herself. All the others quickly got into the swing of things as if they had been warming up all their lives to do it.” How could such acts be committed? Were these people distinctly different to us? If not‚ how could ‘ordinary men’ and women become
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment
Throughout the ages‚ many experiments have been performed on willing and unwilling participants. Some experiments happened to be non-harming‚ while others caused much distress‚ pain‚ and sometimes death to the subjects. Human experimentation today has greatly transitioned due to past experiences for the better of the participants. Some of the past experiments that brought upon the changes in laws and standards were the Little Albert Experiment‚ Stanford Prison Experiment‚ human vivisection‚ and the
Premium Stanford prison experiment
Breanna Brantigan Stanford Prison Study In 1971‚ a group of psychologists created a remarkable experiment using a mock prison as the setting‚ with college students role-playing prisoners and guards to test the power of the social situation to determine behavior. The research‚ referred to as the Stanford Prison Experiment‚ is a classic display of situational power and how it influences someone’s morals and behavior. The experiment was supposed to last two weeks‚ however‚ the unexpected transformation
Premium
a leader can turn quickly against their citizens. The government has much more power than the people in basically any country and can easily have the power go to their head. The Stanford Prison Experiment has proven this to be true. This experiment was to test if people in positions of power‚ specifically prison guards‚ were more likely to humiliate and belittle the prisoners because of predispositions or the situation they were in. It was tested on 24 male
Premium
there are many other factors that contribute to what makes people do evil acts. The social psychology concepts of obedience‚ power‚ and the fundamental attribution error are explored throughout this paper through case studies of the Stanford Prison Experiment‚ the Jonestown cult‚ and the prisoner abuse at Abu Ghriab. Low Effort Thinking Each day people encounter peers‚ family‚ and colleagues. Throughout different social circles and situations people evaluate situations and each other using their
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment
obedience but focused more on conformity. He fulfilled this through an experiment called the Stanford Prison Experiment. The experiment was a prison simulation in the basement of a building on Stanford’s campus‚ where students from the college played different roles. Half of them were " guards" and the other half were "prisoners." Philip Zimbardo’s article titled "The Stanford Prison Experiment" gives insight on conformity‚ and how the prison guards and convicts would tend to slip into predefined roles. Resulting
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment A Few Good Men
instance‚ the famous Stanford Prison experiment conducted by Philip Zimbardo aimed to investigate the effect of roles of prisoner and guard as a cause of a certain abusive behavior in prison. In this experiment‚ Zimbardo assigned participants in a role of either guards or prisoners. As the experiment proceeded‚ participants who played the role of prisoners began to feel uncomfortable with the experiment which has also resulted in a few withdraws. The outcome of the experiment suggests that roles play
Premium Science Stanford prison experiment Scientific method