Preview

A Doll's House Struggles Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
873 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Doll's House Struggles Essay
Financial Struggles affecting Individuality

The individuals within the society of Henrik Ibsen's play, A Doll's House, are prohibited from being fully developed individuals, due to social and financial problems. A Doll's House is set in Norway in the late 1800s. At the time, Norway was just hit by a economic depression, making it difficult to find a job, and even harder to get promoted to a high-paying position. Also, sexism was very prominent, and women were precluded from their rights and freedom. Because everybody did not want to face socioeconomic hardships, people like Nils Krogstad, Christine Linde and Torvald Helmer were forced to lose oneself, and the desperate attempt to not get excluded by society lead them to follow mainstream societal values. Nils Krogstad is a character who harasses Nora, eventually ruining her marriage, and is portrayed as the antagonist of this play,
…show more content…
In the past, he suffered from heavy economic hardships and worked very hard to save his family for it. He finally gets a promotion to become the manager of the bank, suddenly feels immense pressure from society, and makes him very conscious of other people’s perceptions of him and of his position in the comunity. Torvald gets Nora to keep their house in a 'perfect' condition. He constantly monitors his wife - the food she eats, and also her appearance. His over-anxiety of a good appearance in the community is shown when he reasons his rejection of Nora's request to keep Krogstad at the office. Torvald says that he will not listen to her because if he did, he would become “a laughing stock before the entire staff”(1342). In the end, when Nora leaves Torvald, his chief concern was to save 'the appearance' of their household. Because of his over commitment to social appearances, Torvald gets his values and priorities distorted, and that leads him to the tragic ending of the story, losing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Nora and Torvald are a married couple and been taking on many challenges in their relationship.Torvald basically takes care of and provides for Nova and their children. During their conversation in Act 3 it talks about how she was been transferred from her father’s hands to torvald hands. Nora feels like torvald is treating her like a poor women from hand to mouth. This means that he is treating her like she can’t do for herself. Torvald is taking over her life and when her father was alive he did the same that’s why her life consist of nothing. Torvald is very physically controlling, treats Nora like she’s a child and doesn't trust her with money. The expression Nora used as “ doll child” and “doll wife” is that her life was controlled by her husband and father. By expression her feelings she tells torvald how she feels. She says, “You and Papa have committed a great sin against me. It is your fault that I have made nothing of my life.”. She doesn’t have anything to fall back on besides what her husband gives her. She can’t do anything on her own without getting an approval from Torvald.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A woman sheltered by an awful man, turning into a woman breaking free from a helpless man. Ibsen’s A Doll’s House shows evidence that it is written with a feminist agenda. Nora is treated like border line trash the whole play in comparison to her husband. She is called weak, unintelligent, and needy. She is called terrible names the whole time, demeaning her role as a woman. Even the title of the play supports it being themed on feminism. A Doll’s House may have reason to be seen as a play about humanism, but the main theme is indeed…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nora Dramatic Irony

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nora's epiphany occurs when the truth is finally revealed. As Torvald unleashes his revulsion against Nora and her crime of forgery, the protagonist realizes that her husband is not who she thought he was at all. Torvald has no intention of taking the blame for Nora's crime. She thought for certain that he would selflessly give up everything for her, like she given up so much for him. When he fails to do this, she accepts the fact that their marriage has been an illusion. In this moment Nora’s eyes and mind finally become clear of any delusions she once possessed. Nora was dominated and controlled by her father before marriage and afterwards it was her husband dominating her. Torvald never treated her as an equal. She had existed for her husband and she had always expected that her husband would come to her aid when she was in trouble. She had been waiting for miracles to happen. Nora feared that Krogstad would expose everything and that their family would come undone. Contrary to her expectation, Torvald behaved like a hypocrite concerned more with societies idea of morality and a notion of social prestige, not with his wife's welfare and care. He came out in his true colors. Nora realized that her husband didn't see her as an individual. She wanted to dissolve her ties with him by abandoning him and the children. She thought her duty toward herself was above her duty as a…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    At the start of the play, Nora is seen as a caring mother and wife; however, this is an affectation of joy and contentment. In reality, her true character is held enslaved by her tyrannical husband. Her demeaning nicknames, “skylark” and “little song bird” truly are a metaphor for her mental and physical imprisonment to the societal roles of being a mother and wife. Nora accepts this captivity, however, evident through her own use of her nicknames throughout the story in order to pry money from her husband and follow all of his commands. At this point, the audience begins to sense superficiality and materialistic behavior from Nora, but this view soon changes as Ibsen reveals his realistic writing style. Deceit is first seen as she consumes macaroons secretively, in spite of her husband’s disapproval. She begins to reassure to Torvald that she, “should not think of going against (his) wishes’,”(Ibsen,1.4) and is dishonest once again when telling him Chritine Linde and Dr. Rank brought her the desserts. This fraudulence continues as she searches for a way to hastily pay a debt which her financially independent husband is unaware of. She hides the truth from her husband in the same manner she participates in a game of “hide-and-seek” with her…

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The nineteenth century saw huge social and economic changes. Society shifted from a largely rural agricultural community of 'landed gentry' and land workers, to urban communities based on manufacturing more than ever before. One's place in society was defined by one's ability to make and control money. Those who controlled the money were the bankers and lawyers. Their ability to control money enabled them to control others' lives, including defining morals. The story starts with Nora when she borrows money from Krogstad, though Norsa's husband does not know about this. After a promotion they become wealthy and Nora starts to pay back the money. Krogstad works for Torvold, Nora’s spouse, who decides to fire Krongstad. In response to being fired Krongstad sends a letter saying what Nora has done, Torvold then gets angry, but after receiving a second letter that explains the true situation about how Nora was influenced he is happy once again. However, Nora decides to leave the house.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A women was not capable of taking on serious issues especially without a higher education. Women were only seen as the caretaker of the household and not the moneymaker. Nora’s decision at the end of the play, played a big role, Nora realizes that she needs to find herself, and not her husband Helmer. The play does not tell us where Nora goes at the end of a play, it leaves us in awe. Maybe Nora left because she wanted a higher education, and in Norway that wasn’t permitted at that time. Nora wants to start a new life without her husband Helmer, she has no money because Helmer was taking care of her. Nora just wants to have her own life, and maybe that means for her to get a higher education and get a job where she doesn’t have to depend on Helmer. I never thought about it in that way until I researched, the question about women’s role in Norway in the 19th century. Many women were dependent on their husbands, or a male figure in there life. Nora was always dependent on Helmer and her father, “I mean that I was simply transferred from Papa’s hand to yours . You arranged everything according to your own taste, and so I got the same tastes as you or else I pretended to. I am really not quite sure which I think sometimes the one and sometimes the other” (Ibsen, 66). Ibsen created the character Nora as woman who wasn’t following the social marriage norms. When Nora leaves the house, she becomes a symbol for all women, and the article by Largueche shows us how women fought for their education and social norm rights. Some questions still remain, where did Nora go? And did she leave because she wanted a higher education or did she just want to find her true identity? If I were to explore the topic further, I would want their to be a second part to the play “A Doll’s House”. I want to know where Nora went and if she ever got back with Helmer.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henrik Ibsen uses connecting themes such as the uncovering of Torvald’s true nature, his real characterization of Nora and the inevitable hampering of Nora’s rightful individualistic growth in order to show this moral justification. In the beginning, Nora’s fondness for Torvald knew no limits and she sought to do whatever was possible without due regard for herself to please him. She believes being the source of entertainment, indulgence, and appeasement for Torvald allows for her own source of contentment. Although Torvald commands a certain sentimental affection towards Nora, the source for most of these feelings however come solely from the appreciation of her alluring outwardly complexion. Nora’s intricate emotions and intelligence take a back seat in Torvalds mind to the more important plastic image that she is mandated to portray. Perfect examples of this dynamic throughout the whole story…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In A Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen, Nora, a frivolous, lying wife, makes a major decision in which she borrows a loan meant to be used for a trip to better her husband’s health, behind his back. The play develops through constant struggles Nora takes to keep in secret her actions. In the end, her husband Torvald learns of her loan and is extremely infuriated to the point where he says he no longer loves her. Shocked by her husband’s reaction, Nora looks back on her motives for making her decision and decides she had been living a fake life which had come to be by a lack of communication in their marriage. After struggling so much to keep her husband from finding a painful truth and being critized when it was known, Nora realizes all she had ever been was a doll to her loved ones which pushes her to make the right decision of leaving everything behind and finding herself.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the start of the play, Nora seems humble and responds positively to her husband’s humor and lightheartedness. “[smiling quietly and happily] ‘You haven’t any idea how many expenses we skylarks and squirrels have, Torvald.’ ‘You are an odd little soul. Very like your father. You always find some new way of wheedling money out of me,”… (Ibsen, pg.8). Ibsen’s view of human life was much tilted toward men in this play and he did a good job making the wife very doll-like in her husband’s eye. “She is to live for his sake only, to have no other thought than of him, no feelings, no opinions, save those which are his” (Jaeger, Henrik Bernhard. Henrik Ibsen: A Critical Biography. Benjamin Blom, inc., New York 1972, pg 240). She is excited about all the money that Torvald’s new job will…

    • 3445 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Doll House

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the play A Doll House written by Henrick Isben several social issues were revealed. Considering the time period, women had little to no rights at all. They were basically expected to have no voice, and to just keep a happy home. The main social issues that are portrayed in the play mostly stem from a high level of disrespect for women that are presented in several different ways.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a doll's house summary

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The theme that women have a low status in society is one of the main aspects of the play. Though Nora is economically advantaged in comparison to the play’s other female characters, she still lives a difficult life because society dictates that Torvald be the marriage’s dominant partner. Torvald issues decrees and condescends to Nora, and Nora must hide her loan from him because she…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Torvald Helmer Dominance

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When you look at doll houses you see the perfect little family inside, the perfect little chairs, and the perfect little scene for what family life should be, but in the play “A Doll House” by Henrik Ibsen you see a different picture with the two main characters Torvald Helmer and Nora Helmer, who are husband and wife. At the beginning of the play the audience sees the first scene between Torvald and his wife about money; Torvald is depicted as a stereotypical man from the 19th Century. Torvald shows his dominance over his wife Nora, when he questions her about being out and spending money. Torvald is the manly man and he wants total control over everything that happens in his home, and he shows his dominance and control when he says, “[b]ut…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nora’s final walk out from the house seems to be a selfish woman, but it was the example of power and strength of struggle women. Nora wasn’t agreed to live life with Torvalds’s condition. She argue that, “I believe that before all else, I’m a human being, no less than you-or anyway, I ought to try to become one (Ibsen 840).” Here, Ibsen clearly expresses the independent nature of women. Nora believes that women had a right to develop their own individuality, but in reality her role has been often self-sacrificial. She always been treated as a narrow house wife by Torvalds. She shows her eagerness, “you thought it fun to be in love with me, that’s all (Ibsen 838).”Her biggest discovery was to save her husband’s life, but she disappointed when it became an unforgivable crime in the eyes of her husband and society. At the last, she left her husband and children was begets action in her life as a feminist. The whole play based on the beginning of feminism in 19th centuries. Nora who always thought that she was nothing else than the entertainment of her husband transcend her into a independent woman was the most dramatic change on the…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is all due to Krogstad’s current reputation that has changed people’s view of him. After Kristine leaves him, he went on to have a family and a career. He has been living life day by day providing for his family the way Torvald has. Unfortunately, it all changes due to his unlawful act of forging someone’s signature. Torvald says, “…that is why he has gone under altogether. Just think how a guilty man like that has to lie and play the hypocrite with everyone, how he has to wear a mask in the presence of those near and dear to him, even before his own wife and children” to Nora as he informs her of his views on Krogstad. That does not stop Krogstad from continuing to better himself and change everyone’s perspective of him. He sacrifices himself in a way where he does not let his reputation stop him from moving on in life. Now that Torvald is initially his boss, he must find a way to keep his position. That is where Nora comes in play. Krogstad knows that Torvald and Nora’s relationship is corrupt and nothing but hidden lies. With that it brings Krogstad and Kristine together after many years of…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Torvald lives by society's norms, and when faced with a choice of whether to support his wife or society, he sides with society. When he realizes that she has broken the law in forging her father's signature on the loan document, he never questions the morality of such a law: it is left to Nora to do that. His aim is to preserve the appearance of respectability and ensure his continued acceptance in society. He has become so shaped by society's conventions that he cannot see his wife's suffering. In The Cambridge Companion to Ibsen, Gail Finney writes that in Ibsen's own notes for this play, he notes that a mother in modern society is "like certain insects who go away and die when she has done her duty in the propagation of the race." This view is confirmed by Torvald's rejection of Nora when he discovers her secret; he says she is not fit to bring up their children if her reputation is tarnished. For Torvald, public life has obscured and overtaken private self. In order to find out who she is and what she wants, Nora has to reject the life that society prescribes for her as a wife and mother, and strike out on her own. "I am going to see," she tells Torvald in Act 3, "who is right, the world or I."…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics