Throughout the three of these passages, the authors are all evaluating the same topics, but are telling them from different point of views. The passages are, “Klondike Gold Rush”, “from A Woman Who Went to Alaska,” written by May Kellogg Sullivan, and “City of Gold,” by National Film Board of Canada and all of them share the same topic, yet only two of them have the same point of view. For example the first passage, and the third passage share the same point of view, which is 3rd person point of view. And the odd one out is the second passage, which is 1st point of view.
To start out the first passage Klondike Gold Rush is told in 3rd person point of you, because the narrator uses the words such as, they, them, etc. . The author talks about the stampeders, and how the miners struggled throughout the bad timing in the gold rush. Also the topic is, most of the miners worked so hard, yet the outcome wasn’t as planned. For example in the text it says, “The work necessary to retrieve gold was incredible.” And this means that, the miners struggled to get gold, but when it happened they were pleased.
As well as the first passage, the third passage/video is similar to the first one. Despite …show more content…
The second passage is way different, even though that the topic is still the same, the point of view is different in the second passage. The passage is, from A Woman Who Went to Alaska, written by May Kellogg Sullivan, and the government was the problem in this passage. It was a problem because they weren’t having any mercy, and setting rules like left and right. The laws became more strict and more strict as the gold rush went on. For example in the text it says, “charging high taxes in mined gold,” also, “enforcing a nightly curfew.” This means that the government was letting no things slide by, but if they broke the law, they would be