Preview

Absolutism Vs Conservatism Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
795 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Absolutism Vs Conservatism Essay
Social 30-1: Assignment 1
ID #: 1012106
In source one, Franklin D. Roosevelt is stating that true liberal freedom cannot be attained without government involvement. He is promoting Reform Liberalism and a free economy with government interference. Roosevelt was an American President who proposed The New Deal (1933), which created domestic programs to help stabilize American citizens after WWI. The New Deal illustrated Roosevelt’s belief in government to provide freedom and equality of opportunity for Americans. Roosevelt expresses his opposition towards classical liberalism’s ‘laissez faire’ through his statement “People who are out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.” Roosevelt states that government dictatorships are a
…show more content…
Thatcher expresses a right-winged point of view on the government system. She also expresses value in individualism and the principles of Classical Liberalism, where government involvement is little to none, through the quote, “There are individual men and women.” Thatcher argues that the reliance that people have on the government to take care of them has diminished the people’s individual initiative to help themselves first. She believes that as an individual, it is our duty to look after ourselves. Margaret Thatcher expresses an opinion similar to classical liberal economist, Adam Smith, who provided the foundation for the modern capitalist system. Adam Smith believed that the government should have a minimal role within society, which is very similar to Thatcher’s point of view. Thatcher expresses her point of view through critical mockery of people who rely solely on Government assistance: “I have a problem, I’ll get a grant”, “I’m homeless, the government must house me.” Thatcher rejects the idea of Government intervention and advocates for more individual initiative in which she states: “And no government can anything except through the people, and the people must look to themselves first…People have got the entitlements too much in mind, without the obligations.” Source two by Margaret Thatcher expresses a classical liberal point of view, similar to Adam Smith, which rejects government intervention and promotes individual

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Due to the “hands off method” used by Herbert Hoover during the Great Depression, the president can be defined strongly as a conservative. By trying to restore the American economy, Hoover had to try profusely to keep the Unites States’ system from being “swept over” by the depression which had already happened to Europe (Doc D). During the depression, he wanted to restore the top of the economic pyramid by helping railroads, banks, and rural credit corporations and through “trickle down” economics, the bottom of the economic pyramid would fix itself as well. Because he applied a more business-oriented approach rather than a government approach, his plans were more conservative that liberal. Because Hoover believed that too much government involvement would destroy American individuality and self-reliance, which were to him important American values, he thought it was in the best interest of the nation to use less government in his policies (Doc A). Hoover drew the line at federal relief to individuals because he didn’t want federal…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    New Deal Dbq

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When the Great Depression swept over the nation, the country was left in shambles. In order to resolve the problems at hand, solutions and abrupt change needed to be taken. The country had seen little progress taken by President Hoover, but when Roosevelt took office, the nation began to seem immediate change. Although some displeased with his steps forward, Roosevelt and his brain trusts worked progressively and effectively to activate immediate change through relief systems for the hurting country. FDR’s new deal jump started many relief programs that eased the ache of many homes. However, not everyone was in favor of his fast-paced progressive actions and understood it to be heading towards communism. A particular patron addressed in his…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    was that people rose up to gain sovereignty, equality, and the unjust actions that were made…

    • 573 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the history of America conflicting beliefs of how the government should affect our lives has been categorized from either a Liberal or a conservative standpoint. A liberal is one who may be considered a radical, one who believes government has a role to play in our lives and moves towards the new age of humanity. Conservatives share a completely different set of beliefs, they believe in the old ways, a government which doesn't influence our lives, and side with the rights of states and the people. According to these beliefs Hoover follows conservative beliefs more or less and Roosevelt follows a more liberal beliefs. These standpoints can be more defined by comparing them with radicals and influential figures of the age.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first way - the gradual expansion of "deep" talks between elite groups, ie negotiations involving all the phases of the negotiation process. In this case, the closer you are to the center of a social subject of decision-making, especially in the deeper level talks on important political issues it is incorporated.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is commonly thought that President Herbert Hoover is a conservative. He believed in less government participation in the people's daily life. In his candidate speech, he renounced liberalism because it set bounds to the liberties of the people. He felt a great need to take government out of peoples lives [Doc A]. This is shown with his "hands off policy" during the depression. He believed in the business cycle and that the country would pull its self out of the depression. He did not want to use government power in dealing with this. In his message to Congress Hoover stated that the, "economic depression cannot be cured by legislative action or executive pronouncement." Hoover believed that all the government can do is encouraged the people to do what is best for their community. The government's only contribution was giving aid through programs - like waterways, harbor, and flood control - however only for a temporary time [Doc B]. He strongly believed that if the government kept giving money to solve problems, organizations and businesses would cease to help their community thus…

    • 981 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The purpose of this essay is to determine whether welfare reform since 1997 has been determined more by ideology or pragmatism. This essay offers a summary of public pronouncements made by some of New Labour’s leading thinkers in the years before they took office in order to then delve into the motivations behind them. While the focus on welfare reforms undertaken since 1997 rests with the Labour government’s policy toward the NHS, the essay establishes that there is a great deal of evidence to support the view that Labour have acted out of pragmatic considerations. Nevertheless, it is argued that policy toward reforming one of the key elements of welfare in Britain, the National health Service, in the main, has been driven by ideology.…

    • 3395 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism is the acceptance of, or belief in absolute principles in political, philosophical, ethical, or theological matters. French absolutism started with Louis XIV and Russian absolutism started with Peter the Great. Louis XIV ruled from 1643-1714 and Peter the Great ruled from 1699-1725. In French absolutism, the rule of absolute monarchs was not all embracing because they lacked the financial and military resources, and the technology to make it so. France and Russia are alike in absolutism that they both sought to control religion and that they got the rich out of paying taxes. They are different in that Louis XIV wasn’t successful in wars, but Peter the Great was.…

    • 942 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Over the years, generations have shared different perspectives on the idea of wealth and property. People have discussed the topic several times to explain what is right and wrong. Many agreed on the importance of wealth, while others viewed wealth as a source of evil. The population of Europe, when the Enlightenment occurred, often associated wealth with power. Therefore, the lower classes did not own any power over the government due to their lack of wealth. As the age of Enlightenment refreshed the way people thought, change was noticeable in Europe; however, people were still struggling to solve the problem that the ancient regime left behind. Many great thinkers, philosopher, and politicians were trying to define the problem and explain so people could adjust and understand each other; however, many of the philosopher, theologians did not agree on the results of the Enlightenment. Abraham Kuyper, the Dutch politician and theologian, and Russell H. Conwell, the American Baptist minister and writer, both spent a great amount of time defining and explaining the idea of wealth, poverty, and property for society. Whereas, Kuyper criticizes socialism and argues the…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Freedom from Summary

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages

    She states that another beneficial aspect of freedom is our “effective government” and speaker one argues that government is the reason he is safe and sound because if there was no superior power to make and enforce rules, everything would crumble. The best type of government is that which meddles the least amount possible in its people’s lives (Lappe, 510). According to the speaker, the people believe government needs to be minimized to an extent. Everyone assumes so much from the government, and then complain when they think there’s too much power over us argues speaker one. Government shouldn’t intervene with a person’s choices and if it does, it is taking our freedom away (“Freedom From and Freedom To”). Speaker one claims although this superior law is there to protect us, it cannot stop all forms of detriment. There has to be a boundary on how much government is allowed to take over, which means “less responsibilities” (“Lappe, 511) In order for the nation to be ultimately free, the people need to stop relying on government to take on so much responsibility claims speaker one.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Franklin D. Roosevelt introduced twentieth century liberalism in response to a severely depressed economy in the early part of the 1930’s. The response was politically welcomed due to a lack of governmental tools to respond to the situation (Hamby 1992, 22). FDR’s progressivism is labeled, The New Deal. The New Deal was an ambitious to bring about relief, recovery and long-term reform. It included a massive increase in public spending. Prior to this, the federal government’s responsibilities focused on foreign policy or domestic trade issues. By the end of FDR’s the New Deal, the government captured the control of much of the economic activity, social assistance and labor relations (Hamby 1992, 23). FDR was in the right time and place to accomplish this, but his “appealing style “ and “ mastery of political technique” helped create this massive new role of the federal government.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of a single person holding dominion over all others to form an independent state is the driving force in state consolidation in 17th century Europe. Political development in this concept led to different methods of operating a government two prominent models being absolutism and constitutionalism. The first one centers on a strong centralized monarchy and the dominating royal power and the latter is based on a limited monarchy where the ruler is confined to the law and parliament. Theoretically, England planned to follow the constitutional model but the Stuart monarchs thought otherwise of this and conflicted with the Parliament throughout the century. This conflict centers on the evolution of England to becoming a world power.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Britain and the United States preferred indirect control whereas most other European countries and France wanted to have direct control. Indirect control has a couple of different ideas which included: the user of local government officials, there was limited self-rule, the main goal was to develop future leaders, and the government institutions were based on many European styles. There was a legislative council which included colonial officials and professionals nominated by the governor for each individual colony(s). Direct control on the other hand consisted of the opposite ideas of indirect control. The French and Europeans much rather wanted direct control which led this country to the idea of a policy called paternalism. Women in Africa…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his speech Roosevelt stated that “if the average citizen is guaranteed equal opportunity in the polling place, he must have equal opportunity in the marketplace” (Roosevelt n.d.). The government should promote justice, equality and stability inspiring much confidence on the part of the American citizens. Roosevelt saw the government as freedom’s ally compared to the previous presidency when the government was freedom’s enemy causing economic inequality. Roosevelt claimed that many government leaders forgot “what the Flag and the Constitution stand for, stand for democracy, not tyranny; for freedom, not subjection; and against a dictatorship by mob rule” (Roosevelt n.d.). The New Deal resulted in a new role for the federal government supporting individuals financially and promoting economic stability in the country. Roosevelt saw economic security as a political condition of personal freedom, as “the New Deal reduced individual liberty for the sake of increasing economic security” (Cohen 171). Thus, the New Deal benefited the country and people living there changing the role of the government in the country’s economy and other…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Prior to the New Deal, America was in a time of crisis. The economy was in a deep depression and social tensions were at the boiling point. The United States underwent dramatic change in social and political ideology after FDR implemented the New Deal. This essay argues that the New Deal positively modified social, political, and labor beliefs of the American society.…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays