According To Tudor's Arguments Of Why Horror?

Through the years, “Scary movies” or horror films have been a standout compared to other genres, even though many people do not choose to watch horror films.Between these two conflicting opinions, both writers try looking into to talk regarding three fundamental topics within the genre and the contrasts to viewpoints. The two scholars Carroll and Tudor both made strong arguments on "Why Horror?". In Carroll's argument, he makes claims that the audience that chooses to watch horror films have because it is a thrilling form of art. We also discussed in class that Carroll made a strong claim saying that a horror film usually makes the audience feel repulsed, disturbed, distressed, and see the monster as unnatural. Another claim that was made by Carroll is that distrust plays a huge role in the appeal horror films. On a similar yet different argument,Tudor does not seem as passionate about the reason audiences watch horror films. Tudor claims tension, fear, anxiety, sadism, and masochism. Tudor views the genre as morbid and tasteless. The main focus of Tudor's argument is people who watch horror films have a some urge to be in fear. Also, Tudor claims viewers who watch horror films have a stronger chance of having psychological or psychoanalytic significance. The two articles do not coincide and have two completely different points of view on "why horror?".
Childbirth has been represented in various manners in contemporary popular culture and popular cinema has delivered alternate perspectives on maternity. With some scholars claiming veracity for horror in the psychological field, horror has been deemed to constitute an expressionistic allegory of reality. A brief summary of the film's plot is discussed. The author, Lucy Fischer claims that beyond the film's portrayal of parturition, it also serves as a skewed documentary of the societal and personal conflict in female