Preview

Actor Observer Bias Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
767 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Actor Observer Bias Essay
PSY150 UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL BEHAVIOR
TERM PROJECT
Concept 1. Actor Observer Bias (Chapter 2) Actor observer bias is a type of bias in attribution process. In actor observer bias, people tend to interpret and react the same situation in different ways because of the position that they are in. As a result, they -as actors and observers- make different statements about the same situation. In fact, if a person is in the actor position, the attributions that s/he makes are based on the external factors. In contrast, if the person is observer in the same situation, s/he attributes others’ behavior to the internal factors rather than external factors. The reason of this differentiation is that since people cannot observe their own behavior in the actor position, they have difficulty in making internal
…show more content…
There are several examples of actor observer bias that can be given from daily life. To illustrate, my cousin and I used to play together when we were 5-6 years old. Sometimes we used to hurt each other; and, our grandmother used to punish the one who started to hurt the other. When the one who was punished was my cousin, I used to think that he deserved it because he is very puckish. On the other hand, when my grandmother punished me I used to blame external factors, such as he broke my toy intentionally and made fun of it; so, he provoked me to hurt him.
Concept 2. Counterfactual Reasoning (Chapter 3) Counterfactual reasoning, which is a type of heuristics, is described as the fact that individuals tend to think about alternative outcomes of an event that had already happened and resulted negatively, unusually, unexpectedly, or abnormally. Besides, individuals try to see how those alternative outcomes would have affected the present reality. In this context, counterfactual reasoning involves “what if?” questions and “if only” sentences in those events which resulted

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Attributions are the causal judgments about why the event or behavior occurred. These attributions can be either internal (made about a person’s characteristics, e.g. personality) or external (made about a person’s situation e.g. weather). One type of the attribution theory that helps us to determine the “why” in behavior is the Kelley’s Covariation Model of Attribution (Kelley, 1967). In this model, behaviour is analyzed to see how well it is correlated either internal or external factors or a combination of both. When making attributions using the Kelley’s covariation there are three criteria in which the attributions are based on: consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency. Consensus criterion is whether the behavior is correlated with the situation or in other terms whether different people do this behavior in the same situation. Distinctiveness refers to the correlation between behaviour and the individual specifically how unique the behavior is to that particular situation. Last out of the three is consistency which looks at how behavior is correlated with both the person and the situation that is, is the behavior is the same towards the…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Man3240 Exam 2 Study Guide

    • 4273 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Attribution theory: an attempt when individuals observe behavior to determine whether it is internally or externally caused…

    • 4273 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attribution theory describes how causes are attributed to past events. This may be dispositional (attributed to a person) or situational. In a single instance of an outcome, correspondent inference theory suggests diagnosis is based on choice, expectations and intent. Expected, freely chosen behaviour is considered to be dispositional, whereas unexpected, forced behaviour is attributed to situation. Attributing intent is simplest when considering behaviour with only one positive effect. When an outcome occurs numerous times, covariation theory describes possible cause attribution. This involves looking at cases where the suspected cause is present/absent and matching them to instances where the outcome is present/absent, utilising information on consensus (how others behave), distinctiveness (how the individual behaves in different circumstances) and consistency (how the individual has behaved in similar circumstances). Consistency should be high to make a good attribution judgement. When consensus and distinctiveness are also high, the attribution is likely to be situational whereas if consensus and distinctiveness are low, a dispositional attribution is likely.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Attribution theory is concerned with how individuals interpret events and how this relates to their thinking and behaviour. Attribution theory assumes that people try to determine why people do what they do. When we (the observer) try to understand why another person (the actor) did something, we can either attribute one or more causes to that behaviour, internal/dispositional -the inference that a person is behaving in a certain way because of something about the person, such as attitude, character or personality. Or; external/situational - the inference that a person is…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cognitive Psych Study Guide

    • 6138 Words
    • 25 Pages

    Describe the difference between personal and situational attributions in explaining behavior. What is the Fundamental Attribution Error, and how is it related to these types of attributions?…

    • 6138 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Revolution was the cause of a buildup of events. The rise of the revolution was brought on by a series of events, these are the main reasons as to why the American Revolution happened, the Intolerable Acts and the formation of the Stamp Act Congress. The Intolerable acts were a set of laws that colonists deemed unfair. These acts were put into place after the Boston Tea Party.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The actor-observer bias is a term in social psychology that refers to a tendency to attribute one's own actions to external causes, while attributing other people's behaviors to internal causes. Essentially, people tend to make different attributions depending upon whether they are the actor or the observer in a situation.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attribution in social behavior is the process of inferring the causes of events or behaviors. For example, in real life, attribution is something we all do every day, usually without any awareness of the underlying processes and biases that lead to…

    • 548 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bystander Effect has been used as an explanation for many events throughout history, but I believe that the true motivation behind bystander apathy is not the quantity of people, but the attitudes of those people. Humans mirror the emotions they see in others, and they follow the actions of the loudest person; if one neighbor had reacted to Kitty Genovese’s murder, it is very possible that the reactions of the other neighbors might have been more alarmed than they…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bystander Effect

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages

    people creates a diffusion of responsibility. Because there are other observers, individuals do not feel as…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fundamental attribution error is when a person overestimates the influence of another person’s personality over a remark or behavior rather than giving credit to the influence the situation may have on the person. A famous experiment demonstrating this “error” was conducted by David Napolitan and George Goethals. In this experiment, they instructed a woman to act either rude and critical, or warm and friendly to each person individually. Half of the group was told that the woman would be acting spontaneously, and the other half was let in on the experiment. The result was that the assumptions about her personality did not change even though half the group had known that she was an actor. Each group assumed that because the woman behaved coldly, her personality was so. Even the group who was told that her behavior was situational had still believed that she was warm and friendly because of the way she was acting in the situation.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    psych

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    15. Actor-observer bias: the tendency to attribute other people's behavior to internal causes while attributing our own behavior to external causes…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When observing the behavior of other people people tend to comprehend and imitate that behavior, especially in cases where people experience positive observational experinces or if it includes rrewards to their. (Razieh Tadayon Nabavi jan 2012)…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Before we delve into details, let’s take a quick look at some astounding facts and figures about the…

    • 2511 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Organic Chemistry 1

    • 10869 Words
    • 44 Pages

    More complex alkenes are best described as E- or Z- based on the Cahn-Ingold-Prelog priority rules (review)…

    • 10869 Words
    • 44 Pages
    Good Essays