Preview

Adr in China

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
677 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Adr in China
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) IN CHINA

In China, many forms of ADR are combined with litigation and arbitration, which can be called hybrid processes that ultimately lead to legally binding outcome under appropriate circumstances. Therefore, in China's legal practice, the meaning of ADR shall be slightly different from the normal definition, for example the result of ADR can lead to legally binding, hybrid processes, if it is agreed by both parties in dispute.
It is generally accepted fact that a third party intervention into a dispute, in whatever degree, is an indispensable feature of ADR in China. It is therefore not without negotiating a third party intervention considered a form of ADR. In the meantime, arbitration, despite its many advantages and similarities to other forms of ADR, due to its inherent nature of the end to a legally binding outcome of the parties in the form of enforceable arbital award, is not seen as a form of ADR by many people. Rather, alternative dispute resolution was considered, as the name suggests, as a way of resolving conflict, which is used as an alternative to litigation and arbitration. As already mentioned above, negotiations without an intervention by a third party is not regarded as ADR. The most commonly seen and most widespread forms of ADR are mediation and conciliation. Because of the linguistical limitations as well as the looseness of the ADR terminology in China, the term conciliation and mediation often is used interchangeably. Both of them are translated to tiaojie (调解) in Mandarin. But it is still practically possible to distinguish between the two.
Mediation, according to the Chinese definition, is an independent third-party technique in which a mediator helps the parties to focus on their real interests and strengths against their emotions in an attempt to unite towards a possible solution. It is crucial for the mediation process is that the independent third party to not make recommendations as to what

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In 2016, Dr. Alexander Nonesuch, a doctor at Sunshine Hospital in the State of Discontent, failed to disclose that he was transgender on his employment application before he started working there in February 2015. Dr. Nonesuch, the plaintiff, married his wife, Renata Mercure, in June 2015. Since Renata was expecting twins on April 1st, 2016, Dr. Nonesuch requested paternity leave and to add his wife and children to his retirement plan. Since the hospital’s management and the board saw Dr. Alexander Nonesuch’s marriage as a same-sex marriage, which is illegal in the State of Discontent. The hospital denied his requests on March 5th; two days after Dr. Nonesuch made his requests on March 3rd, 2016.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It has come to my attention that there has been a state level business dispute which is submitted to ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution). So here, I will discuss about the various methods of ADR. Also, I will suggest/recommend which method of ADR should be used to resolve this case out of court. Further, there will be some discussion on differences between traditional litigation process and ADR.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mgt441 Assignment 4

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Third-party involvement includes mediation, fact-finding, and arbitration”(Fossum, 2015, p.409). Mediation is a party that assists the involved party however remains neutral. Mediation will find a common ground where the parties involved can communicate together in order to find a solution to whatever problem or task is at hand. However easy this may sound the task of bringing a disruptive party together can seem next to impossible. The goal for the mediator is to bring not only communication to the table but also an agreement.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Whereas both parties have agreed to enter the Alternative Dispute Resolution process, the process of Non-binding mediation will be administered by a neutral third party.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Another strategies of resolutions through in the ADR process in the situation of problems in the Learning Team is the mediation. Team member with current or previous involvement in disputes are not able to intervene as arbitrator. According to "San Diego Court” (2014), Mediation is a confidential, non-binding process in which a trained mediator facilitates communication between disputants and assists parties in reaching a mutually acceptable resolution of all or part of their dispute. The mediator is not the decision-maker and does not resolve the dispute, the parties do. However a mediator is often able to more fully explore the parties' underlying interests, needs and priorities ("San Diego Court ", 2014). The ADR Clause is a faster process and more effective that a litigation.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mediators do not give a final verdict on the case, but only serve as a resource of understanding between both parties. In the case that there is not an agreement, the parties can look to other avenues to resolve the legal issue, whether that be another ADR option, or court. In the same manner, Arbitration also uses a third party to handle disputes. When each party agrees to arbitration, usually an expert in the field is called to facilitate the process. Their responsibility is to listen to what each side has to present, and based on the evidence and information, provide a verdict for the case. Some of these cases can be binding meaning that a decision made by the arbitrator is final. In any other instances, if the case is not binding, then either party has the right to go to court if the verdict is not satisfactory (Arbitration and mediation, n.d.). Sometimes I hybrid version of these two processes, known as Med-Arb, may be the best approach. At the beginning of the process a mediator is established, but if an agreement cannot be reached through mediation, then the mediator takes position as an arbitrator and imposes a binding decision for…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mediation is defined as an informal, non-binding process where a neutral party helps two other parties’ cone to a mutual resolution where sometimes these conflicts seem impossible to reach when it is left to only both parties (Masucci, 2003).…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This article is the request for African troops to be sent to Somalia for multiple reasons. The African Union Mission in Somalia needs financial aids and weapons, and they are asking the United Nations to help them with this. They are fighting against al-Shabab, a Somali militant group linked to al-Qaeda. Al-Shabab recently has been strategizing more and more terrorist attacks rather than fighting on the front line. The African Union Mission has been in Somalia since 2007 and their number of troops have been decreasing rapidly for the past two years which is why they need around four thousand four hundred more troops. Al-Shabab is not only threatening the safety of Somali citizens, but the political system that is in place. They are pleading the United Nations to help end this war against al-Shabab, so that Somalia can return to its peacefulness.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The decision made by the arbitrator is legally enforceable (binding). Private arbitrators may be asked to arbitrate on matters that were not able to be resolved through negotiation or mediation. Mediation is a joint problem-solving process in which the parties in conflict sit down and discuss the issue involved, develop options, consider alternatives and reach an agreement through negotiation. The mediator does not interfere, but keeps the lines of communication open. Although a decision reached during the mediation process is not binding on the parties, parties tend to be more committed to a decision reached in this way and are more likely to uphold…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Litigation Law 531

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Disputes are settled by various means every day. This paper will consider the process of traditional litigation and alternative dispute resolution in settling those disputes. Knowing the advantages and disadvantages is important when deciding what process to employ in settling a dispute.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Team Paper

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The objectives for week one was to understand the major components of the legal system and differentiate between legal forms of business. The other objective was to obtain a thorough understanding of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) including advantages and disadvantages. Team B has collaborated on the discussion questions listed below and will reveal the team’s findings and opinions throughout this paper.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the United States, a traditional litigation refers to the process of bringing, defending and maintaining a lawsuit (Cheeseman, 2010). Traditional litigation goes through a structured process of answer, discovery trial and jury. Whereas the nontraditional litigation process, alternative dispute resolution, known as ADR is a more flexible, less expensive, not as time consuming, and confidential process. There are several forms of alternative dispute resolution, mediation, arbitration, negotiation, conciliation, mini-trial, fact-finding and utilizing a judicial referee. Arbitration and mediation are similar to where it is a form of negotiation and a neutral party settles the dispute. Negotiation is where the two parties negotiate to settle the dispute. A mini-trial is a shortened version of a traditional litigation trial. Fact-finding situations call for the parties to employ a third party to investigate the facts to come to a resolution. Lastly, a judicial referee is much like a mini-trial but both parties reserve the right to appeal. Ninety percent of cases are resolved through alternative dispute resolution (Harms, 2011). The next several paragraphs will identify risks associated with traditional litigation and the advantages of the alternative dispute resolution in reducing those risks.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mediation Policy

    • 6675 Words
    • 27 Pages

    To use mediation to promote principles and practices that will facilitate communication and working relationships. Using mediation to resolve differences demonstrates a commitment to a positive approach and joint ownership of concerns and solutions. The mediation process allows parties to resolve their differences quickly, less formally, less adversarily and with more efficient use of resources than traditional dispute mechanisms (i.e., litigation).…

    • 6675 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The second section deals with the role of mediator in conflict resolution which is used effectively in the Asian and…

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, having laws in place facilitates the discussion and resolutions of disputes. In business these resolutions can become very costly to the business, but through methods of dispute resolutions such as alternative dispute resolution (ADR) businesses may remedy the dispute without going through legal battles in a court system. The same applies for disputes in society, as disputes arise, having a guide and understanding of the law allows separate parties to come to a mutual agreement through…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays