This article sheds light on the last affirmative action case which was 10 years ago. The article goes into detail about the 13 page dissent that Justice Anthony M. Kennedy issued after the ruling. The article also talks about whether or not colleges should be allowed to take race into consideration so that they can have diverse classes.…
On June 23rd 2016, the judges of the supreme court gathered to analyze a challenge about the University of Texas of Austin’s race-conscious admissions program. This case, known as Fisher II v. The University of Texas, was brought about when senior Abigail Fisher applied to the University of Texas and did not get in. She was not accepted in the top ten percent program as well( a program in Texas Law stating that top ten percent students from all schools in Texas get automatic admission into UT Austin), and firmly believed that she had the academic status to get in. She implied that the fact that she was white and had a good financial status reduced her chances of admission into the university and that she was heavily racially discriminated.…
Smith and Mr. Garcia, the turbulence may be moderate. They have already expressed concern to Mr. Pike that students that enroll from New City are underprepared for college work, even if they were in the top ten of their high school. By not having the mandate in place, the college wouldn’t have a reason to admit students of color for diversity purpose to maintain funding. This would give the college an incentive not to admit as many students of color into the college, causing even more of a problem for the student coordinators of the minority student outreach and Step Up program. Without the Supreme Court requiring that students of color be admitted into the program, there may be a drastic decrease in student admissions and the Step Up program would have a drastic cut minority enrollment. If the college recruit the targeted student population of educationally and economically disadvantaged students, regardless of their race or ethnicity, the program shouldn’t be in danger of becoming…
People now check on colleges’ admissions programs to see how big of a factor is race. Fisher v Texas was a very similar case to Grutter v Bollinger, as racial discrimination is starting to become an even greater trend in America’s…
Furthermore, the Regents v. Bakke decision upheld the constitutionality of treating race as one consideration among several in admissions procedures, pointing out the value of diversity in learning environments and opposing the application of racial limits. Ultimately, affirmative action is still an important tool for advancing equality of opportunity and diversity, despite recent setbacks. The need to have measurable objectives for affirmative action programs was made clear by the Supreme Court's ruling in SFFA v. Harvard and SFFA v. UNC (2023), which also emphasized the importance of taking race into account as part of an entire admissions process (Professor Stone Class…
II. What Should Replace Racial Affirmative Action in Higher Education? 11 III. Profiles of States in Which Affirmative Action in College Admissions Has Been Banned 26 Notes About the Authors…
Should a man be hired for his skills or for the color of his skin? Is racial diversity in the business world more important then the most qualified workers? Affirmative action has become an important topic in today 's society to better diversify the different races in America. Affirmative action is a set of public policies that were designed for the elimination of discrimination toward race, color, sex, etc. These policies are under attack today because of the unfairness toward the more qualified people. Increasing opportunities for a minority that has suffered past discrimination is the cause for affirmative action, and for the reverse discrimination toward the majority. Many people view discrimination toward one race today to compensate for the discrimination of another race in the past as unfair. This reverse discrimination is unfair treatment toward the majority. Affirmative actions are policies created to give preferential treatment to the discriminated, but also discriminate as well.…
Affirmative Action especially causes a reverse discriminate effect against Asian Americans, although also against Caucasians. The reverse discrimination caused from preferential treatment to African Americans, Latinos, and Native Americans discriminates against Asian Americans because they lose spots at colleges that they would have otherwise received. At the UC San Diego Medical School “chicanos were offered admission at five times the rate of whites and nineteen times the rate of Japanese Americans. [Asian Americans are a] nonwhite, racialized minority [that are] being hurt by [Affirmative Action]” (“Race and Representation: Affirmative Action” 273). If the goal of Affirmative Action is to reverse discrimination done to minorities in the past then Asian Americans should be included in Affirmative Action programs, not discriminated against further. College Affirmative Action programs completely ignore, if not intentionally harm, Asian American students. Statistics shown from the “University of California Berkeley show that 41 percent of the students attending are from an Asian American background [up from 20 percent before affirmative action was forbidden]. On the other hand only 14 percent of the students attending Harvard University” (College Reviews by Students for Students – College…
Institutions that acknowledge race as one of the admission/ recruiting factors makes it harder for white people to get accepted. There have been cases where white students sued against their universities because they felt that they were denied admission because of their race. The most known cases are Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger where Caucasian students disputed the University of Michigan's Race to undergraduate and law school program. These cases were significant in the revision of affirmative action policies. The cases allowed the Supreme Court to question the constitutionality of such affirmative admission policies. Similarly, Abigail Fisher claimed that she was declined admission to the University of Texas because of her race. Ms. Fisher also suggested that such affirmative action laws are not by the 14th amendment which pledges equal protection for all. Moreover, the prejudices evoked by positive discrimination policies makes white people for what their ancestors did in the past. Companies or universities must often discriminate against white people because of affirmative action laws to integrate other racial groups, and that’s unfair. As Chelsea Hoffman puts it, indeed Affirmative action should be considered a "dangerous double standard" that discriminates one over…
Marielena Hincapie’s article “Let Us DREAM” from the Huffington Post, published December 10, 2010 explains the argument on the passing of the DREAM Act and how she and the DREAMers are hoping for a better future and that will happen if the DREAM Act is passed, Marielena is in favor of the DREAM Act. She is the executive director of the National Immigration Law Center she’s a public interest lawyer who protects the rights of immigrant workers as herself, she serves on the American Bar Associations Commission on Immigration and on the executive committee of the National Lawyers Guilds Labor and Employment Committee.…
Hello Class. Let me start off by saying that I support the Republican Party's ideas and values and I am a proud supporter of George W. bush. Do I have your attention now? good. Founded in 1974, the American Association for Affirmative Action, otherwise known as AAAA is a non profit organization that helps minorities achieve equal opportunity in the work force (www.AffirmativeAction.org). The problem with American today is that we are seen as different people because of our skin color, and a catalyst for this is in fact, Affirmative Action. Don't get me wrong, I personally feel as if diversity should definitely be introduced to every single job that this country has to offer, but the way hiring goes is what's wrong. Let me give you a brief history of this country. Back in 1776 America gained independence from England and in the next 180 years, everyone worked for where they were. In the late 1800 early 1900's immigrants from Italy and Ireland came to American in search for a better life and had to work for every dime they ever made. My grandfather had 13 children, and his hard work and dedication to educate him self made him the man he was. In my opinion, as soon as Affirmative Action began, this country lost its dog eats dog mentality when it came to self achievement.…
Every year, high school seniors are faced with the over-whelming decision of choosing which college to attend. For many, it is a question of finances, location, and true potential of being accepted. For others, it is simply a question of whether or not their prospective school is admitting applicants from lower economic classes. Either way, for many students, deciding which college to attend can be a daunting thing.…
On Wednesday June 11, 2008 at 3:00 p.m. (Eastern Daylight Time), the Prime Minister of Canada, the Right Honourable Stephen Harper, made a Statement of Apology to former students of Indian Residential Schools, on behalf of the Government of Canada.…
Affirmative Action has occurred in several cases throughout the Americans history and the case that I will be referring to is Regents of the University of California v. Bakke. This case presents a challenge to the special admissions program of the Medical School of the University of California at Davis, which is designed to assure the admission of a specified number of students from certain minority groups (253). In 1973 and 1974, Allan Bakke, a white male, who applied twice to the Medical School of the University of California at Davis, was rejected even though his grade point average and MCAT scores were higher than most of the applicants. With the fact that applicants that were admitted with the special admissions program had lower scores, Bakke alleged that the Medical School's special admissions program operated to exclude him from the school on the basis of his race (258). This, he stated, violates his rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Equal Protection Clause states that "No State shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The guarantee of equal protection cannot mean one thing when…
Referring to the court case Fisher v. University of Texas, Jason L. Riley—in his article, “Scalia Was Right About Race Preferences”—mentions evidence brought to light by a Justice involved in the case. Riley states, “racial preferences can handicap some black students by placing them in elite schools where they don’t have the same credentials of the average student and struggle academically” (Riley 1). Due to the fact that the aforementioned students were admitted because of their race—rather than their merit and prior education—they find the higher-level academics extremely challenging. The students are wholly unprepared for the work ahead of them, due to their relatively limited primary education, when compared with the education of their more privileged peers. Further evidence of this disparity between the education of students admitted under affirmative action, and students who were not, is displayed in Martin Trow’s paper, “Preferential Admissions in Higher Education”. When speaking about the advantage given to minority students in admissions he states, “The average black student admitted, for example, had SAT scores 250-300 points lower than his or her white and Asian classmates and a substantially weaker high school grade record as well” (Trow 295). Despite the unsatisfactory scores received from African…