All Virtue Is Knowledge Analysis

Socrates was born in 469 B.C.E. to a middle class family. He grew up in political district so when he turned eighteen, he began to work the normal political duties such as compulsory military service and membership in the assembly, the governing body responsible for determining military strategy and legislation were required of Athenian men. Socrates was believed to be unprepossessing and this was a misfortune in a culture that glorified male beauty. In fact Plato has referenced his awkward physic more than once. Socrates was given an appropriate education for a person of his status.Sophroniscus, his father, took pains to give his son an advanced cultural education in poetry, music, and athletics. He spent his days in the Athenian marketplace,
Socrates had many arguments for this thesis. it’s typical to think that someone can be smart without being agreeable, Socrates rejects this and says that wisdom and temperance both have folly as an antonym of itself. If they were truly different they would have their own opposites. As it stands, the identity of their opposites indicates that one cannot possess wisdom without temperance and the opposite.
Another one of socrates contributions to ancient philosophy was the belief that no one errs willingly. Socrates declared that no one made mistakes knowingly in Protagoras 352c, 358b-b when a person does something wrong their failure to do what is right is an intellectual error or because of their unknowingness of the actual right thing. If a person knew what was right he/she would do it right. Therefore, it is not possible for someone to just know what is right and do what is wrong. For example is someone does something wrong they do it because they don’t know what is right and if they claim to know what is right they are confused because if they actually knew the right thing to do they would have done
bad things or intermediate things aren't done for themselves but for the sake of something else that is good. An example of this is when someone puts someone else to death, that person's death will ultimately be beneficial in some way or at least they think it is. People that want bad things to happen do not know that they are truly bad or they wouldn't want it. They want good things even though they don't have the knowledge of what is actually good.
Socrates argues that it is better to suffer an Injustice than to commit one. Socrates argues that, if something is more shameful, it overpowers in either badness or pain or both. Since committing a crime is not more painful than suffering one, committing an injustice cannot overpower in pain or both pain and badness. Therefore, given the choice between the two, we should choose to suffer rather than commit an