Allopathic Vs Osteopathy Essay

Allopathic versus Osteopathic Medicine What type of family doctor do you have? Is it an allopathic (M.D.) or an Osteopathic (D.O.) doctor? Does it even matter? How did these two different types of medicine begin? Allopathic medicine began in the late eighteenth century, when German physician Samuel Hahnemann coined the term (Jarvis). His philosophy was to eliminate suffering from previous ways of medicine. Allopathy’s meaning is literally “opposite suffering”. Osteopathic medicine began in the late nineteenth century and was developed by a man named Andrew Taylor Still (A Brief History).It was a new branch of medicine that stemmed from allopathic medicine. It was based on the thought process of treating the patient as a whole instead of just with drugs. Though these two doctors may sound different at first, the care for their patients is highly similar. Although osteopathic medicine originated from allopathic medicine, that doesn't mean there isn’t any differences. The main difference is the way the physicians are trained. Osteopathic doctors are trained to study the body as a whole
They are both trained in basic patient care; this includes assessing a patient’s symptoms, designating a prognosis, and providing continuous care to the patient. They are also trained interpersonally, that is, being able to accurately and effectively communicate with patients. This is particularly important if the doctor is forced to relay terrible news, such as a patient having cancer. They are also both trained extensively in anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology. They need to attend an undergraduate program that is usually 4 years, where they will receive their bachelors degree. They then move on to 4 years of medical school, where they obtain their M.D. or D.O.. Finally, after completing 4 brutal years of medical school, they attend a residential program that can last up to 7