Preview

American Democratic Ideals Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
599 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
American Democratic Ideals Analysis
The conflict between American power and American democratic ideals was a recurring problem that took on a new form. There was a change in America’s foreign policy and their willingness to establish dominance in the world, in the turn of the twentieth century, but there had always been a struggle of democratic ideals. This was the United States’ first attempt to claim territories across the world, but they had been constantly claiming territories on their own continent. For example, there was a period of westward expansion throughout the nineteenth century. In this period Americans were stealing, and later fighting for, lands from the Native Americans, with the excuse of Manifest Destiny. This fight for lands occupied by Native Americans can be seen in the Indian Wars. This war was in conflict with their democratic ideals because they were …show more content…
Beveridge is that the United States have a right to the Philippines, and should not give them up. He claims that since there are chinese markets near by they should not give away the opportunity that they have received.
Historical Context: In the late 1800’s and the early 1900’s, the United STates began to make their claim to foreign lands, such as the Philippines. Many Americans disagreed with the idea of taking control of a land half-way across the world. However, many Americans also saw this as their right to land and new markets.
Author’s Purpose: Beveridge’s purpose in saying this was to persuade his intended audience that we should continue to control the Philippines. He makes a claim that is is our right to be there, according to God, and that Americans need to civilize that savages that live there.
Intended Audience: Beveridge’s intended audience was the Senate of the United States, which is known because this was a speech for the Senate. However, this was also meant for the world, so they can understand the necessity, in his eyes, of occupying the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    When America first acquired new Islands from Spain they weren't sure what to do with them. Cuba was granted semi-independence, but the Philippines was annexed because giving the Philipines back to Spain, or giving the Phillipines independence was out of the question. The annexation of the Philipines caused tenison in America being some 7,000 miles away. However, the United States should not have annexed the Philipines because Filipinos did not want to be governed by America, and back home Americans were just as unhappy with this.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis: Both Jacksonian economic policy and westward movement in America were indicative of the development of democracy between 1820 and 1840. It was in this antebellum era that the United States, with economic and sectional changes, made effects to comply democratic politics and make changes should the country’s founding philosophy be led astray.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1980 Dbq

    • 3003 Words
    • 13 Pages

    "In examining the question how the disturbances on the frontiers are to be quieted, two modes present themselves, by which the object might perhaps be effected; the first of which is by raising an army, and (destroying the resisting] tribes entirely, or 2ndly by forming treaties of peace with them, in which their rights and limits should be explicitly defined, and the treaties observed on the part of the United States with the most rigid justice, by punishing the whites, who should violate the same. In considering the first mode, an inquiry would arise, whether, under the existing circumstances of affairs, the United States have a clear right, consistently with the principles of justice and the laws of nature, to proceed to the destruction or expulsion of the savages.... The Indians being the prior occupants, possess the right of the soil. It cannot be taken from them unless by their free consent, or by the right of conquest in case of a. just war. To dispossess them on any other principle, would be a gross violation of the fundamental laws of nature, and of that distributive justice which is the glory of a nation. But if it should be decided, on an abstract view of the situation, to remove by force the ... Indians from the territory they occupy, the finances of the United States would not at present…

    • 3003 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    II. South East Asians in the Philippines begin to move around and realize that colonialism is ubiquitous…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the chapter Foreigners in their Native land: Manifest Destiny in the Southwest, Ronald Takaki describes the ideology of manifest destiny and its driving force to American colonists in the invasion of Mexican held territory in the Southwest during the 19th century. The conquest occurred in a progressive fashion that started with the war in 1936 that ceded Texas to the U.S. and culminated in the Mexican-American War from 1846 to 1848. The Mexican-American war ended in the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, where the Mexican territories of Alta California and Nuevo Mexico were ceded to the United States. Such territory stretches into what is now all of California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, and parts of Wyoming, Colorado, and New Mexico. Leading up to and following the takeovers, Mexican people were exploited and treated as foreigners in their own land through various methods and actions.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public opinion found the notion of empire enticing and rejoiced over Dewey’s victory at Manila, a place previously unheard-of by most Americans (“this great big ignorant nation, which doesn’t know even the ABC facts of the Philippine episode,” Twain complained in a 1901 letter to Joseph H. Twichell [qtd. in Paine, Letters 705]). Such jingoism was, at the same time, often opposed for equally base, often racist and xenophobic reasons. Twain’s own opposition is eerily prophetic of opposition to war in both Vietnam and Iraq: the war was “a mess, a quagmire from which each fresh step renders the dif culty of extrication immensely greater” . . . . I thought it would be a great thing to give a whole lot of freedom to the Filipinos, but I guess now that it’s better to let them give it to themselves,” he said in 1900 (Zwick). Yet in the letter to Twichell, he acknowledges that his opposition is, at bottom, sel sh: he feels distress as an American that he is “befouled” in the international eye (that of “the sarcastic world,” as he put it) by such a policy (705). Dualism again: are his motives even partly genuine concern for the Philippines, or, as he suspects of himself, solely a matter of concern for his public image, by now that of…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 19th century, the United States had began to expand it’s territory towards the western frontier. This era of U.S. history was dominated by the belief in manifest destiny – the idea that the United States was destined to expand to the west coast, and was justified in doing so (History.com Staff, 2010). However, settlers heading west faced many hindrances to their grand plans along their way, including the Native Americans, who had been living on the land for centuries before western expansion began. Thus began the long balancing act between manifest destiny and the rights of Native Americans. This attempt at balance lead to many unavoidable interactions between the white settlers and the natives, including trade and the attempted relocation and assimilation of the natives.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The proposition calling for equal rights and political democracy of the inhabitants of America were in confutation with the principles calling for the US to follow colonial principles of the European empires that had begun to invade North America in the late 1400s. The colonies that had revolted against British rule in the late 1700s had continued the expansion of settlements and political incorporation that had been practiced since the founding of colonies at Jamestown and Plymouth. The proposal of Indian Removal debated in the US Congress was a straightforward expression of that same expansionism, which dispensed with the past policies of the US that had combined expansion with treaty negotiations that had the form of a meeting and agreements of equals, and proclamations of Indian rights and sovereignty. There was a national campaign developed in support of the Indian resistance, particularly from the Cherokee, that involved diatribes and petitions, public meetings and Congressional debates. The opposition to Removal was advancing principles that in effect called for the US to develop practical policy that was in line with its past proclamations that upheld its treaty commitments to the Indian communities.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (I) Identify the several varieties of liberalism discussed in the chapter on liberalism and the historical circumstances in which they emerged.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    PHILIPPINE HISTORY

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages

    - US President McKinley issued the “Benevolent Assimilation Proclamation” to extend the sovereignty of the US over the entire Philippines, even by force, if necessary.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    WIIFM

    • 2118 Words
    • 9 Pages

    He said in a speech marking the 115th anniversary of the country's independence from Spain that the Philippines has not claimed territory that clearly belongs to another country but only asks that "our territory, rights and dignity be respected."…

    • 2118 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The simple yet notably patriotic statement of the president earned the applause of the participants at the conference, in which hopefully the Filipinos appreciated it - regardless of their political stand about his administration. Come to think of it, it would be wonderful if the statement “I love the Philippines more” is likewise uttered – loud and proud – by every Filipino; with the ‘loving part’ put into action in perpetuum.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Andres

    • 1563 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Philippines also known as “The Pearl of the Orient” like all other great countries had difficult beginnings. Andres Bonifacio and Jose Rizal two of the proponents that instigated our great struggle for freedom, they who reminded us of the pride and strength of a Filipino, they who showed us that we are people who will never give up and will fight no matter what. One became the voice of the people; leading the propaganda movement that inspired the nation to fight against the tyranny and, the other became the leader of the people “The Supreme Leader” that thoroughly ignited the flames of revolution. Jose Rizal wrote and gave us hope; he preferred the pen over the sword while Andres Bonifacio gave life to that hope. He fought and bled for our freedom and instilled in our hearts, our love for our country. Well it is true that Bonifacio has somewhat got this idea of freedom from Rizal but it is Bonifacio who put it into action, what is an idea without an action? . . . action speaks louder than words of ideas. Bonifacio was not chosen as our national hero because the Americans are afraid on Bonifacio's way of liberating our country. The Americans want to colonize our country but in order to fulfill this dream there should be a man to be catapulted from below in order for us to have national hero. Our national hero serves as our idol, and as an idol we must follow his steps. The Americans chose Rizal because he is a reformist; a reformist is not a hindrance in their colonization. Since Bonifacio is a separatist, he is a thorn in their throats. Reformist seek only for reforms but separatist seek for FREEDOM!. In our eyes Andres Bonifacio is the true hero of the Philippines.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Very likely the Philippines will defend with inexpressible valor the liberty secured at the price of so much blood and sacrifice. With the new men that will spring from their soil and with the recollection of their past, they will perhaps strife to enter freely upon the wide road of progress, and all will labor together to strengthen their fatherland, both internally and externally, with the same enthusiasm, with which a youth falls again to tilling the land of his ancestors who long wasted and abandoned through the neglect of those who have withheld it from him. Then the mines will be made to give up their gold for relieving distress, iron for weapons, copper, lead, and coal. Perhaps the country will revive the maritime and mercantile life for which the islanders are fitted by their nature, ability and instincts, and once more free, like the bird that leaves its cage, like the flower that unfolds to the air, will recover the pristine virtues that are gradually dying out and will again become addicted to peace -- cheerful, happy, joyous, hospitable and daring."…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Types of Literature

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages

    He believed that Filipinos are worth dying for because he is the future of this nation.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays