Ellis chooses to focus primarily on three …show more content…
In the introduction, Ellis describes how Washington is often put on a pedestal, as many presidents are. Washington however, is admired at a distance it seems. He is often pictured as an intimidating, almost God-like figure. Ellis attempts to humanize Washington by sharing many of Washington’s personal characteristics. For example, Ellis observes that Washington did not take criticism well when his personal motives were questioned. Overall, I think that Ellis remained relatively objective in his writing. He did tend to favor Washington, yet it would be a challenge to remain completely objective towards the most prominent man in American history. Washington is honored, respected, and celebrated by Ellis, and he deserves it.
Joseph Ellis presented one of the most humanistic accounts of George Washington that I have ever encountered. For that reason, I think that Ellis’s approach to the life of Washington has proven to be valuable. His work could be found in equal merit with other historians such as David McCullough. The overall quality of the book is outstanding and contains very few errors in historical accuracy. Ellis’s work was original, relying on primary sources to showcase his research. Ellis brings information from the life of George Washington to create an enjoyable, enlightening read for