Preview

America's Voting System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
730 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
America's Voting System
Have you ever felt like your vote didn’t really matter in the election? If so, you’re not alone. Millions of Americans every year choose not to vote and for many of them it’s because they don’t think their vote matters. They may be right! Even many of the votes that are cast each year end up having no bearing, and it’s because of the way America’s voting system is set up. In the US we use a system called the electoral college. It’s based on electors who are selected by the political parties in each state. When election day comes each elector, 538 in total, casts their vote for who will be the president. Most of the time this vote is cast in the direction of the popular vote their state, but not always. There are rules stating whom an elector has to vote for. Some electors may take …show more content…
Now you might say that it’s ok because there’s still the popular vote, but the popular vote doesn’t actually matter when it comes to electing the president.
Four presidents in the history of the United States have lost the popular vote and still won thanks to the electoral college. In the 1876 election Rutherford Hayes won the electoral college, but it was actually a lesser known man by the name of Samuel Tilden who won the popular vote. He captured almost 36,000 more votes, but none of them mattered. Another example of this is the 1888 election. Grover Cleveland captured almost 100,000 more votes, but he still lost the electoral votes by a large margin of 233 to 168. So that’s yet another 100,000 votes with absolutely no bearing on what happened in the election. The most recent example and by far the biggest margin the popular vote was in the 2000 election. Al Gore

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In today’s age, a President must win 270 electoral votes to become President. I no candidate wins a majority of electoral votes, the 12th amendment to the Constitution provides for Presidential election by the House of Representatives with each state delegation receiving one vote. The electors are chosen by the states and the District of Columbia on the day of the general election. The electors in each state have to meet to cast their votes.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my opinion our votes don’t matter because of the Electoral College Voting system and’ i think it should. I feel this way because the nominee that wins the race, wins by the Electoral College votes. This indicates that our votes don’t matter and a prime example is Hillary Clinton won the popular vote…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College elected such a man, not the majority of the people. This, among many other reasons, is why the Electoral College should be abolished. Even though it is in the Constitution, the Electoral College is unconstitutional. The American Bill of rights declares us a democracy, which therefore gives everyone equal say. However, as Leon Friedman of the Huffington Post shows“Wyoming has a population of 584,153 and has three electoral votes, which means that each Wyoming elector represents 194,717 voters.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the years the Electoral College has been proven to be outdated. People wonder constantly if their vote counts anymore or, if this method is affective any longer. There are three main reasons why the Electoral College is outdated and should be abolished. The presidential candidates only pay attention to the states with the most Electoral votes, we also have a larger and more educated population then when this was originally set up, lastly it does not seem as if your vote really counts since there have been at least four occurrences where the president with the popular vote has lost the election.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The argument most used against the Electoral College is that there is a possibility for a candidate to win the popular vote and still lose the election. This has happened four times since the Electoral College went into effect. The most recent time this had happened was in the elections of 2000. Historian Rick Shenkman from George Mason University states that “there has been no aspect of what the founders worked up in Philadelphia that has received more criticism than the Electoral College.” (Dotinga, 2008) Ever since the Electoral College went into effect there have been more than 700 attempts to either abolish it completely or to drastically ratify it (Uhlmann,…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The electoral college should be abolished simply because it does not reflect a common citizen’s vote, in an article by The Huffington Post it is said that a presidential nominee needs to only win 21% of the votes and still win the Presidency:”A presidential candidate could be elected with as a little as 21.8%.” So even if the other candidate received 79% of the popular votes and run away with…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    We have learned about how our country elects a new president. Things such as the primaries, the National Conventions, and the General election. Which fortunately, or unfortunately, we had the possibility of experiencing very recently. Although Donald Trump had won the most electoral votes, Secretary Clinton won the popular vote! This also relates to what we have studied. We learned that the first candidate who wins at least 270 electoral votes they automatically become the president elect. That means, even if one candidate doesn't win the popular vote, they can still win the…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although, Gore had over 500,000 more popular votes, Bush was still able to win the presidency due to a mere 537 votes in Florida. This was all made entirely possible by the Electoral College. Is this not inherently wrong in your eyes? The candidate that more people wanted was denied the office because of a flawed system? That is ludicrous. And the craziest part is that our federal government has allowed this to happen 3 other times in our nation’s history. We should not blindly accept a system that allows our voice to be silenced. We must step up to those we have put in power and show them that we as a people deserve the ability to have a…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every four years, Americans stand in lines, eager to vote for their candidate and hope they win. Sadly, many Americans don’t realize their influence on the election is pretty minimal. The votes go to the state, and whatever candidate has more votes in that state, wins the state. Even if the popular vote is for the opposite candidate that wins, hence 2016’s election. The Electoral College should be abolished, and be replaced in the constitution by the popular vote, which represents each individual's real vote.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American presidential electoral system consists of five different stages, the main two being the primaries and the Electoral College. Although the Electoral College has been used since the founding fathers wrote the constitution, meaning there are many strengths in the system, the weaknesses of the system outweigh substantially the strengths. Some of these being, the candidate without the popular vote can be elected as president. For example in the 2000 presidential elections, George Bush won against Al Gore with no popular vote. This is just one of the many reasons as to why the weaknesses outweigh the strengths.…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This has happened in 1824, 1876, 1888, 2000, and more recently this year (2016) presidential election, Donald Trump beats Hillary Clinton with 290 Electoral votes to 232 Electoral votes. While Hillary Clinton had 979,401 more popular votes than Trump.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Several small states have a similar population as one large state, but the total electoral votes of the small state are more than double that of the large state, which is politically incorrect and unfair. Also, electors’ opinions are different than those of the citizens who voted for them. A president who the people did not want, but was elected by the Electoral College, was chosen. Citizens are not represented accurately by their electors. The Electoral College was founded for a viable reason, but this reason is not viable in today’s circumstances. We don’t need the Electoral College anymore, and without it, America can live up to its great reputation of…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many Americans believe they pick the President of United States on Election day. The truth is, we really don't have a say so. We, in reality, just vote for State Electors who then hold the electoral vote to vote for the next president. This is an unjust way to do this in a “democratic” country. I do not believe the electoral college is an equitable way to elect the President of United States.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Electoral College Failure

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 2000, Al Gore, with 266 electoral votes, lost the election to George W. Bush with 271, despite having the popular vote by a margin of 543,895 votes. The electors in the Electoral College have been known, a few times, to be ‘faithless’ to what the people in their state voted for, and cast their vote toward a different candidate than they voted for. As recently as 1988, a Democratic Elector cast his votes toward Lloyd Benson to be President, and Michael Dukakis to be the Vice, when he was supposed to cast the other way around. If the people of the United States were truly represented by the Electoral College, then Al Gore would have been elected, due to popular vote; seeing the fact that Bush was the candidate elected in 2000, it just doesn’t add up. There’s no way, taking this information into consideration, that the Electoral College would properly represent that which the American people truly desire in an election…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is called faithless electors. Now there are tons of arguments against the electoral college, but this one is by far the strongest. In most elections, the person who wins the electoral vote wins the popular vote. But it is actually possible to win the presidency with zero percent of the popular vote. Even though the 21.8% was mentioned earlier in this essay, that number is gotten is assuming all the electoral voters vote for who they are supposed to be voting for. According to Tyler Lewis, “While electors are generally extremely loyal to the party they align with, they don’t have to vote the way the people of their state instructed them to. In other words, just because a candidate won the popular vote in your state does not mean that your electors have to cast a vote for said candidate themselves.” What Tyler Lewis is stating there is that electors can vote for whoever they want! So one person can override the decision made by thousands, if not millions, of people! A person who does not vote for their states candidate is called a faithless elector. Sure, this rarely happens because some states have penalties if you do this and it has never happened enough to directly affect the results of the election, but the plain fact that this can even happen in the first place is a threat to America’s…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays