Preview

Analysis Of Ruth Benedict's Article, A Defense Of Moral Relativism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
109 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Of Ruth Benedict's Article, A Defense Of Moral Relativism
Ruth Benedict talks about morally good, versus habits in her article, A Defense of Moral Relativism. On page 83 Benedict says, “We do not any longer make the mistake of deriving the mortality of our locality and decade directly from the inevitable constitution of human nature.”
What happens in the discussion to those being born with it, versus it becoming habit? For example, Benedict talks about homosexuality. There are some who say they were born homosexual and that is how they have always been. How does being gay develop from habit? In addition, if you are gay how does one justify their biology versus the morally good or right?
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ao1: Examine One Dilemma in Sexual Ethics and Outline Different Ways in Which It May Be Resolved.
    • 1143 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ao1: Examine One Dilemma in Sexual Ethics and Outline Different Ways in Which It May Be Resolved.

    Many areas of science resolve the issue of homosexuality as a sexual ethics dilemma by analysing the causes of homosexuality. Sigmund Freud claimed that homosexuality is a personality disorder resulting from a person’s failure to deal with repressed issues of sexuality from infancy and to develop fully into mature sexuality. He claimed that the causes of homosexuality simply trace back to the relationship between a child and their parents. Many researchers believe that homosexuality may be the result of an imbalance of the hormones or a genetic disorder. Both these arguments go some way to solving this dilemma as both conclusions suggest that homosexuality is not a moral choice and cannot be prevented or supressed.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Shaw: Morality and Ethical Relativism
    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Shaw: Morality and Ethical Relativism

    Ethical relativism is a concept in which most simple minded individuals adhere to. According to definition in the chapter, ethical relativism is the normative theory that what is right is what the culture or individual says is right. Shaw argues that it is not very plausible to say that ethical relativism is determined by what a person thinks is right and wrong. He gives reason that it “collapses the distinction between thinking something is right and it’s actually being right.” Ethical relativism may be justified occasionally. William H. Shaw examines ethical relativism by providing comprehensive examples on why relativism is a weak method in gaining morals.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    PHL300: Moral Relativism Debate
    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages

    PHL300: Moral Relativism Debate

    My understanding of what Dobson had to say about moral relativism is in agreement with my source, All About God Ministries, Inc. It is stated in their article “All About Philosophy” “Moral relativism is the view that moral truths depend on the individual or group who hold them. There are no moral absolutes. Moral relativism cheapens human life. When morality is reduced to personal tastes, people exchange the question, “What is good?” for the pleasure question, “What feels good?” Rather than basing decisions on what is right, decisions are based on self-interest” ("Moral Relativism”, 2017, para. 5-6)…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Moral Relativism Analysis
    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page

    Moral Relativism Analysis

    Moral Relativism is the thought that the moral beliefs held by individuals is influenced and dependent on the culture in which they live in considers tolerable. Hence, what is considered morally appropriate in a single society perhaps is perceived as immoral in a different society. In actuality they both maybe right as they have distinct creators resulting in different laws, diversity, and possibly religious views of each other. Ruth Benedict defends the theory of moral relativism in her article A Defense of Moral Relativism from The Journal of General Psychology. In contrast, William B. Irvine author of Confronting Relativism feels in a few swift examples people can be talked out of their views on moral…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Example Of Moral Relativism
    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Example Of Moral Relativism

    Moral relativism did not become a prominent topic in philosophy or elsewhere until the 20th century. Moral relativism is the making of an excuse for the action done. Behaviors should not be dismissed under certain circumstances. Moral relativism is dangerous and illogical which can be seen through murders, abortion, and lying.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Does Ethical Relativism Really Exist?
    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Does Ethical Relativism Really Exist?

    Ruth Benedict an American anthropologist believes that no culture is any better than any other culture no matter their beliefs. She also believes that every culture has their own distinctions and is unique in their own way. Benedict argues that science forces us to accept ethical relativism (web.mnstate.edu/gracyk/courses/web). She also states the claim that what is morally good is what is habitual she…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Theories Of Ethical Relativism
    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Theories Of Ethical Relativism

    Relativism is the idea that one's beliefs and values are understood in terms of one's society, culture, or even one's own individual values. You may disagree with someone and believe your view is superior, relative to you as an individual; more often, relativism is described in terms of the values of the community in which one lives. The view of ethical relativism regards values as determined by one's own ethical standards, often those provided by one's own culture and background. Rather than insisting that there are moral absolutes, moral claims must be interpreted in terms of how they reflect a person's viewpoint; moral claims are then said to be "right in a given culture" or "wrong for a given society." Perhaps one person lives in a culture where having a sexual relationship outside of marriage is regarded as one of the worst things a person can do; in this culture a person engaging in extramarital sex may be punished or even forced to leave. But another culture might have a considerably different…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Objective Basis of Morality Challenged
    • 1595 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Objective Basis of Morality Challenged

    The origins of morality and what is defined as "good" or "bad", "unethical" or "moral" can easily boggle the mind. It is a topic that can be debated almost endlessly. There are many factors that must be taken into consideration to provide valid philosophies; yet there will still always be debatable elements. Two concepts of morality that are in direct opposition of each other are moral objectivism and moral relativism. Moral relativism can be subjective, in which morals are particular an individuals own beliefs; or, they can be conventional, in which morals are specific to a society and vary from culture to culture. On the other hand, moral objectivism does not leave room for opinions; it reasons that moral judgments are either true or false absolutely. These conflicting views create much cause for deliberation.…

    • 1595 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Relativism and Morality Lenn Goodman
    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Relativism and Morality Lenn Goodman

    Lenn Goodman offers a very good argument about his idea of the things that are wrong. I agree with his argument that four of the things that we should look to in whatever being we worship are “(1) genocide, politically induced famine, and germ warfare; (2) terrorism, hostage taking, and child warriors; (3) slavery, polygamy, and incest; and (4) rape and female genital cutting.” (Goodman, Project Muse, pg 88)…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill: The Definition Of Morality
    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Stuart Mill: The Definition Of Morality

    The philosopher, Mr. Immanuel Kant has found that morality lives through the use of habits. Kant asserted that,…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compare and contrast ethical relativism
    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare and contrast ethical relativism

    Timeless questions asked in different ways. What are morals? And if any who decides what is right or wrong? The answers we get vary depending on who is asked or which theory we believe to be true. Whether the universal theory or the ethical relativism; The fundamental difference in these theories is defined in their names universal theory believe that morals are universal and ethical relativism reason that ethics is relative depending on the views of the people during that time period and the who you ask. We will be exploring what it means to be an ethical relativist, its principles, strengths and weakness, and if this theory is valid.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Homosexual People Are Born Gay Essay
    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Homosexual People Are Born Gay Essay

    Whether or not people are born homosexual (or choose to be), has been an ongoing debate for…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Homosexuality and Religion
    • 2244 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Homosexuality and Religion

    Is homosexuality a genetic trait we’re born with, or do we choose this lifestyle? Is it a lack of father and a more involved mother? Why do people think this is abnormal? There are so many questions that people have about homosexuality, their beliefs on it, and why they think it is wrong or right. I have heard so many people say, “It’s Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.” Why does religion have a profound effect on why people believe that homosexuality is wrong; that homosexuals are automatically doomed to hell? Gay people have lived a daunting life for centuries because people think that being homosexual is out of the “norm” and that God created everyone to procreate. God created everyone equal, and he taught us to love one another. People often wonder, and I have personally been told this,” that people choose this lifestyle. The story,” Foundations of the Earth”, provides the reader with a vivid image on religion and homosexuality. People use religion to answer many of life’s problems, especially when it comes to moral topics such as homosexuality; whether it’s right or wrong, negative or positive.…

    • 2244 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Is Treating Homosexuality Ethical and Effective
    • 1947 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Is Treating Homosexuality Ethical and Effective

    "There are numerous theories about the origins of a person's sexual orientation; most scientists today agree that sexual orientation is most likely the result of a complex interaction of environmental, cognitive and biological factors. In most people, sexual orientation is shaped at an early age. There is also considerable recent evidence to suggest that biology, including genetic or inborn hormonal factors, play a significant role in a person's sexuality. In summary, it is important to recognize that there are…

    • 1947 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Ethical Relativism
    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Arguments Against Ethical Relativism

    Saying that ethics are relative is an effortless way to avoid a controversial topic concerning ethics. In the case of relativism, we can simply say that your opinion is true and mine too and nothing being wrong with that. On the other hand, ethical absolutism tells us that there is an objective moral code and that certain of our actions as humans are necessarily right or wrong. What would happen if we say two contradictory statements can't coexist as Aristotle demonstrated? Through the law of non-contradiction from Aristotle and ethical absolutism, I will argue against ethical relativism.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More