Preview

Relativism and Morality Lenn Goodman

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
846 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Relativism and Morality Lenn Goodman
RELATIVISM AND MORALITY

Lenn Goodman offers a very good argument about his idea of the things that are wrong. I agree with his argument that four of the things that we should look to in whatever being we worship are “(1) genocide, politically induced famine, and germ warfare; (2) terrorism, hostage taking, and child warriors; (3) slavery, polygamy, and incest; and (4) rape and female genital cutting.” (Goodman, Project Muse, pg 88) When Goodman talks about genocide, famine, and germ warfare, he said that “All living things make claims to life.” and “Murder is wrong because it destroys a human subject.” These are both excellent arguments about why genocide should be universally wrong. Goodman argues that warfare is not always wrong. I disagree with him about this. How many lives have been lost due to war, whether it be germ warfare or any other type of warfare? If war is universally wrong, then the subjects of a community will not need to be protected from other communities or countries. I believe that many wars could be avoided if the four areas Goodman discusses are followed universally. Genocide and famine happen because of fear and hatred. If it is embedded in the customs and traditions of every culture that genocide and political famine are wrong, I believe it will be easier to enforce a loving community and not one that is filled with fear and hatred. The next topics that Goodman discusses are terrorism, hostages and child warriors. All of these things can be avoided if it is universally accepted that warfare is wrong. The best example of terrorism that I can think of was the attack on the world trade center on
9-11. If the world was a more accepting place, and religious views were accepted, no matter what they are, terrorism and war would be decreased. If the world would accept that war was wrong, there would be no terrorism, hostages, or child warriors. This all relates back to my opinion of terrorism happening because of fear.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In "Dispensing Morality" (2005), Ellen Goodman asserts that she wants people to have strong moral grounds ("To each his own conscience...") but they have to understand other people’s moral grounds and priorities and not meddle into other people’s personal lives ("But the drugstore is not an altar. The last time I looked, the pharmacist’s license did not include the right to dispense morality."). Goodman illuminates how conscience clauses starts to increasingly empower and gives people opportunities to make choices based on their moral beliefs to the point of inconveniencing people; It starts with laws of exempting doctors in 47 states who don’t perform abortions which the author believes is fair as “Doctors are not automatons who leaves their…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Formal Writing

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages

    September the 11th 2001. Four airliners, hijacked to implement acts of terrorism against targets in the United States of America. The product of this: 2900 fatalities and a limitless figure on those traumatized. Over a decade later the wounds inflicted by 9/11 remain raw. It is perhaps one of the most controversial, revolutionary and conspiracy ridden events in human history.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article “Some Moral Minima” by Lenn Goodman states many good arguments that something’s should be seen as moral wrong. I agree with his beliefs that he is discussing throughout this article. All members of a group should not be punished for their cultural differences. In this paper I will share and support my opinions of the arguments discussed in the article by Lenn Goodman.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people are lead to adopt Ethical Relativism because they believe that it justifies their view that one ought to be tolerant of the different behavior of people in other cultures. However, Ethical Relativism does not really justify tolerance at all. All around the world, there are different types of cultures, which have different ethical values that will be correct according to their cultures. Nevertheless, some people might argue about different cultures that have different moral codes that they can not accept; examples: polygamy and infanticide. On the other hand, Ethical Relativism proposes that we can stop the criticism and be more tolerant with other cultures. To illustrate, we could no longer say that custom of other societies…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Everyone is aware of the difficult and menacing situation in which human society - shrunk into one community with a common fate - finds itself, but only a few acts accordingly. Most people go on living their everyday life: half frightened, half indifferent, they behold the ghostly tragicomedy this is being performed on the international stage before the eyes and ears of the world. But on that stage, on which the actors under the floodlights play their ordained parts, our fate of tomorrow, life or death of the nations, is being decided. It would be different if the problem were not one of things made by man himself, such as the atomic bomb and other means of mass destruction equally menacing all peoples. It would be different, for instance, if an epidemic of bubonic plague were threatening the entire world. In such a case conscientious and expert persons would be brought together and they would work out an intelligent plan to combat the plague. After having reached agreement upon the right ways and means, they would submit their plan to the governments. Those would hardly raise serious objections but rather agree speedily on the measures to be taken. They certainly would never think of trying to handle the matter in such a way that their own nation would be spared whereas the next one would be decimated. But could not our situation be compared to one of a menacing epidemic? People are unable to view this situation in its true light, for their eyes are blinded by passion. General fear and anxiety create hatred and aggressiveness. The adaptation to warlike aims and activities has corrupted the mentality of man; as a result, intelligent, objective, and humane thinking has hardly any effect and is even suspected and persecuted as unpatriotic. There are, no doubt, in the opposite camps enough people of sound judgment and sense of justice who would be capable and eager to work out together a solution for the factual…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    How Does 9/11 Impact Me

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After 9/11, the United States declared war on terrorism and the goal of capturing Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda and putting them to justice. This event impacts me the most because this event started terrorism around the world, security in the United States has increased since the attack, and it made the United States go to…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical relativism is a concept in which most simple minded individuals adhere to. According to definition in the chapter, ethical relativism is the normative theory that what is right is what the culture or individual says is right. Shaw argues that it is not very plausible to say that ethical relativism is determined by what a person thinks is right and wrong. He gives reason that it “collapses the distinction between thinking something is right and it’s actually being right.” Ethical relativism may be justified occasionally. William H. Shaw examines ethical relativism by providing comprehensive examples on why relativism is a weak method in gaining morals.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moral relativism did not become a prominent topic in philosophy or elsewhere until the 20th century. Moral relativism is the making of an excuse for the action done. Behaviors should not be dismissed under certain circumstances. Moral relativism is dangerous and illogical which can be seen through murders, abortion, and lying.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Relativism is the idea that one's beliefs and values are understood in terms of one's society, culture, or even one's own individual values. You may disagree with someone and believe your view is superior, relative to you as an individual; more often, relativism is described in terms of the values of the community in which one lives. The view of ethical relativism regards values as determined by one's own ethical standards, often those provided by one's own culture and background. Rather than insisting that there are moral absolutes, moral claims must be interpreted in terms of how they reflect a person's viewpoint; moral claims are then said to be "right in a given culture" or "wrong for a given society." Perhaps one person lives in a culture where having a sexual relationship outside of marriage is regarded as one of the worst things a person can do; in this culture a person engaging in extramarital sex may be punished or even forced to leave. But another culture might have a considerably different…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Murder is wrong because it destroys a human subject (Goodman, 2010).” Goodman is very correct in this statement but does this also include warfare? People know that in the war there are times that you have to kill to protect yourself, your fellow soldiers, and/or your country. Do you classify this as murder? My thoughts on this is murder is when you kill because of hatred or anger, killing in warfare is the cause of having to protect yourself and what you believe in. “Warfare is not always wrong; it may be necessary to protect such subjects (Goodman, 2010).”…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Morality is the human attempt to define what is right and wrong pertaining to our actions and thoughts. Conferring to C.S. Lewis, he describes the behavior on three levels: First is to certify fair play and agreement between persons; second is to help make us better people in order to have a decent civilization; and the third is to keep us in a good connection with the control that created us. We can become moral by ourselves by expanding those things that can help us pursue our dreams and by believing in ourselves which give us a motivation. What motivates our life is the mind behind the physical things. What motivates the mind is the being that permeates everything.…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If there were one event in history that I was fortunate enough to be able to change, it would be the events that occurred on September 11, 2001. Not only did many innocent people die on that day due to terrorism, but also people are still dying to this day. The affects of that event on are nation are still felt ten years after the actual attacks occurred. Many families have lost and are still losing loved ones who are sacrificing themselves for the greater good of fighting terrorism across the globe. September 11th was single handedly the largest foreign attack on U.S. soil. The series of catastrophic events that occurred on that dreadful day sparked a, later to be called the “War on Terror”. The only thing that could be received as a positive out of this situation would be that it unites citizens across the nation as one and our since of nationalism sky- rocketed to the highest it has ever been. On that note it is still known as the worst day in American history, and that’s why it would be better off if it never were to happen. Terrorism and terrorist attacks could have been avoided by trying to create democracy in places where terrorism takes priority over the government. The U.S. has been attempting to intervene with the government in terrorist nations for the past ten years, but I feel like if they started the fight before these attacks ever happened it could have prevented much of the devastation that occurred on September 11th and the years following. Another solution that is much easier and cost effective would have been to increase our security in airports and airlines. With a heightened sense of national security the attacks would have never mad it through security thus never allowing 9/11 to ever happen. With just a slight increase in awareness in places of mass transportation, millions of Americans and their families could have avoided losing family members and loved ones. Unfortunately the aftermath of September 11th is still affecting…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Effects

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On September 11, 2001 a terrorist attack occurred that had a huge impact on the world. The terrorist attack was an aircraft hijacking and suicide attack by a Islamic terrorist group called al-Qaeda on the United State’s twin towers. Many people just think it was an act of terrorism but I think that it was also an act to spread fear and chaos in order for them to gain power. Ever since this incident occurred, there has been many extreme changes but mostly on immigration, terrorism, racism, and the military.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Moral Realism

    • 2443 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In this paper, I examine the connection between judgments of fact and moral judgments in an attempt to discern whether moral judgments are simply a subset of judgments of fact. I will look mostly at an argument posed by many moral realists that takes moral facts to be “supervenient natural facts which are independent of our theorizing about them”1 and in which moral judgments are determined by objective facts which relate to human flourishing or pleasure and pain. I will also, though, take a look at the fact/value gap and determine the effect on the connection between moral judgments and judgments of fact of an attempt to close this gap.…

    • 2443 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ruth Benedict talks about morally good, versus habits in her article, A Defense of Moral Relativism. On page 83 Benedict says, “We do not any longer make the mistake of deriving the mortality of our locality and decade directly from the inevitable constitution of human nature.”…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays