Preview

Analysis Of The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
262 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Of The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx
The Communist Manifesto, written by Karl Marx is an economical and philosophical ideology that is centered on communism. Specifically, it is centered on the redistribution of wealth so that everyone in a specified nation or State is completely equal in wealth for the “betterment” of the society. This in theory eliminates the class system and as a result is intended to eliminate the oppression that comes along with the class separation and wage gap. Thankfully, for me this literary piece’s brilliance does not come simply from Marx’s economic ideals but instead it comes from the simple fact that it exists at all. What challenges me and forces me to strive towards betterment is that the Communist Manifesto serves as a reminder to me that it is
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Primary Source Analysis the Communist Manifesto
    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Primary Source Analysis the Communist Manifesto

    The Communist Manifesto discusses the political objectives of communists on behalf of the proletariat class. The ultimate goal of the Communist Manifesto and communism is the overthrow of the bourgeois by the proletariat class and the removal of private property. “formation of the proletariat into a class, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy, conquest of political power by the proletariat.” (Marx) Marx theorized that all revolutions were related to class struggle and the only way to remove the bourgeois class was the abolishment of private property. “…modern bourgeois private property is the final and most complete expression of the system of producing and appropriating products that is based on class antagonisms, on the exploitation of the many by the few. In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.” (Marx) The abolishment of property is one of the most defining principles in communism it is, however not intrinsic to a communist revolution. “The French Revolution, for example, abolished feudal property in favour of bourgeois property.” (Marx) Marx theorized for a communist society to function properly a list of conditions was required.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    The Widespread Appeal of the Communist Manifesto
    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Widespread Appeal of the Communist Manifesto

    The Communist Manifesto, published in 1848, was one of the most influential texts of the 19th century. In brief, it outlines how all of human development has been forms of class struggles, first with the feudal lord and peasant, and in later years the bourgeoisie and proletariat. According to Marx, the final stage of the development of society is rebellion of the working class. It is inevitable that the laborers will come to rule themselves and overthrow the capitalists. Capitalism is heavily attacked by Marx; he describes the system as exploitative, cruel, unjust, and therefore destined to be overthrown. Through the manifesto, Marx works to call the workers together to gain control of their future, as he believes they must.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Karl Marx: Historical Investigation
    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Karl Marx: Historical Investigation

    Karl Marx and his developed theory of Marxism played a vital role in influencing Lenin’s efforts to overthrow the Provisional Government eventually leading to the Russian Revolution of 1917.…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Envy By Justin D Arms: An Analysis
    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Envy By Justin D Arms: An Analysis

    Those unfamiliar with Karl Marx, the egalitarian normative theorist insists that the “first phase of communist society the economy will distribute goods according to the norm, to each according to his labor contribution” (Arneson 56). Basically, Marx is stating that a society should satisfy its people by creating a form of equal opportunity, and yet those who cannot contribute or do not have the proper skill in contributing cannot be rewarded, thus making this type of society defective. With regards to this, Marx discarded this norm and claimed that if the communist society is attained by higher phase, then the society can eventually “move beyond the sphere of bourgeois right altogether and operate according to the norm, from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs” (Arneson 56). Marx’s is presenting how equality can be achieved if one is able to contribute anything according to his or her…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Marx in Soho
    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marx in Soho

    In his Communist Manifesto, he spoke of a new social order that would eradicate the inequality of wealth among the people. He theorized that no one would possess anything more than the other. The rich would be forced to yield everything they had in excess to the poor. Poverty and starvation would no longer exist under this new social order. Karl Marx founded the ideal that after a revolutionary struggle, it would be a victory for the working class or the proletariat and a communist society…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx
    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx

    own the cheap labor forces in the whole society. Furthermore, they accumulate and own the huge wealth.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Can Communism Be The Best Socioeconomic System?
    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Can Communism Be The Best Socioeconomic System?

    The debate over the superior socioeconomic system has gone on for over 100 years, and there seems to never be any consensus. In fact, the debate has become so heated that wars have been fought in order to prove supremacy—i.e. the Cold War fought primarily between the USA and the USSR. On one end of this debate lies the communist party that’s goal is to eliminate the gap between the rich and the poor by creating social and economic equality between classes. The opposing party is the capitalists, who strive to for free market economy and individual enterprise. Socialism is the middle ground as it is a mix of both private corporations and government run facilities.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Communist Manifesto And Marxism
    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Communist Manifesto And Marxism

    Marxism and the ideals of the Communist Manifesto diffused during the twentieth century in a variety of similar yet differentiated ways. Marx, Engels, and Lenin's version of communism was created and seen as entirely equal in the proletarian class. China and the Soviet Union implemented these ideas of building a classless society destroying exploitation and the occurrence of equality amongst the people. Both of these nations adapted and differentiated these idea,s to their needs, this all lead to the slowing or breaking of their country economically, politically, and socially.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Misconceptions Of Marx's Manifesto Against Communism
    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Misconceptions Of Marx's Manifesto Against Communism

    All of the European powers are against Communism, and frequently criticize its ideas. The Communist supporters have gathered in London and written this Manifesto in order make their views clear and to get rid of any misconceptions. It begins by bringing up class inequality. Through history we can see the upper class and lower class in permanent opposition to one another, which is sometimes obvious but sometimes not. They often fight, which ends in either a complete reconstruction of the society or in common ruin for both classes.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Review of Marx's Communist Manifesto
    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Review of Marx's Communist Manifesto

    Marx is counter arguing against capitalists. The argument against communism that Capitalists make is that communism does not allow those who work harder to be rewarded by their hard work. Therefore, Marx mocks the capitalists saying that in it is only 10% of the population that maintains the wealth in a capitalist society in reality. Marx’s most relevant argument regarding this view of capitalism or being only for 10% of the population is when he say’s “According to this, bourgeois society ought long ago to have gone to the dogs through sheer idleness; for those of its members who work acquire nothing, and those who acquire anything do not work.” Marx believes that the working class should be rewarded more for the hard work they put in vs the rich who are wealthy and do not have to put in as much work.…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Communism: The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx
    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Communism: The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

    Karl Marx The Communist Manifesto reflects an attempt to explain the goals of Communism, as well as the theory underlying this movement. It argues that class struggles, or the exploitation of one class by another, are the motivating force behind all historical developments. Class relationships are defined by an era's means of production. However, eventually these relationships cease to be compatible with the developing forces of production. At this point, a revolution occurs and a new class emerges as the ruling one.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx Response Paper
    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Karl Marx Response Paper

    According to Karl Marx, wages are a representation of one’s potential value of labor, however company owners necessarily get more money from one’s labor than an individual is paid in wages, for wages are based upon what is considered the minimal amount of money needed to sustain a worker’s life. This makes it a structural necessity in capitalism to feel as though we are paid less than the amount of work we put in. Given the author’s arguments, going through a retraining program in order to find a fulfilling career goes with Marx’s claim that we sell our labor for a wage in order to live, but he does not take into consideration the satisfaction received in a fulfilling career such as…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Antithesis Vs Communism
    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Antithesis Vs Communism

    Will Rogers once stated, “Communism is like prohibition; it’s a good idea but it won’t work.” Since it’s inception in mid 1800’s, Communism has been an idea that has had its ups and downs. Based on the idea of eliminating class antagonism, Communism is a synthesis of two separate entities. In a class system there exist owners and workers. Owners control the majority of the wealth and means of production. These persons were referred to as the bourgeoisie where as the workers, who only earned a small wage, were known as the proletariat. These two units can be seen as a thesis and antithesis, and by combining these two a synthesis, or in this case Communism, was created.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Communist Manifesto Research Paper
    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Communist Manifesto Research Paper

    Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels wrote The Communist Manifesto to promote a working class revolution to overthrow the bourgeois class who controlled the factors of production at that time. It can be seen in some parts of the manifesto, the authors seemed to acknowledge the benefits or improvements that the bourgeois have made in the world. As an example, "it has created enormous cities, greatly increased the urban population, and has thus rescued a considerable part of the population from the idiocy of rural life." (The Communist Manifesto, p. 3) The author implied that the world has become much more civilized and advanced because of the bourgeois. In was stated in the document, "there is too much civilization, too much means of subsistence, too much industry, too much commerce." Karl Marx has shown that in a way the bourgeois has brought on much change towards society and the improvements of the lives of people in the world as compared with…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Communist Manifesto
    • 513 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Communist Manifesto

    In the reading, the communist manifesto, Marx talks about ten main points on how to turn our society into a communist society. The first point that Marx makes I do not agree with. I think that his first point means that the government can come in and take someone’s land that they own. I don’t think that anyone should be able to just randomly decide that they get to take your property away from you. I do not agree with the second point he makes either. People who are not as wealthy as others already struggle to afford things that their family needs. If the taxes heavily increase it will make it that much harder on families who already struggle. Increasing taxes not only affects the people who are considered poor but it also affects everyone else as well. The third point that Marx states I also do not agree with. If you are supposed to receive something from inheritance then you should get it. When someone passes away and leaves particular things to someone their wishes should be honored. I both agree and disagree with the fourth point that he makes. If emigrants or rebels own land and they are doing illegal things on it or with it then I believe that the land should be able to be taken away. If they are using it for good purposes like to build shelter or grow food then I believe they should be able to keep it. Marx’s fifth point I don’t believe that it would be a good idea. With a single person running a big corporation like that could make any decision they want, which can be bad. When there is a group of people who own a corporation they have to take a vote on big decisions. I believe that Marx’s sixth point can be good and bad. The state paying for transportation can be a good thing, but what happens when they run out of money? I don’t think the state could afford to pay for so many people flying on planes, or any form of transportation like that. The seventh point Marx…

    • 513 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More