Preview

The Misconceptions Of Marx's Manifesto Against Communism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
822 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Misconceptions Of Marx's Manifesto Against Communism
All of the European powers are against Communism, and frequently criticize its ideas. The Communist supporters have gathered in London and written this Manifesto in order make their views clear and to get rid of any misconceptions. It begins by bringing up class inequality. Through history we can see the upper class and lower class in permanent opposition to one another, which is sometimes obvious but sometimes not. They often fight, which ends in either a complete reconstruction of the society or in common ruin for both classes. Classes have been simplified over time. They are now the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The bourgeoisie is the result of many revolutions in production and exchange. When modern industry took over, the industrial …show more content…
The Communists want the make the proletariat a class and over through the bourgeois. Marx admits that Communists have been criticized for wanting to get rid of private property. But he argues that changing it into all common property does not abolish property as a right, but changes its character, by eliminating its class dependency. This challenges the bourgeois freedom, which is why the bourgeois are against the Communist ideas. Marx also says that, despite the claims, Communism doesn't keep people from the products of their work, it keeps them from inconveniencing others in the process. Marx then talks about and refutes some common beliefs about communism such as people won’t want to work, there will no longer be the same culture, the abolishment of country and nationality, the family will be abolished. He denies that any of these things will happen and goes on to say that the things against Communism based on religion, philosophy, or ideology aren’t worth being looked into. The likely steps in the proposed revolution will include the disappearance of private land ownership, the institution of a large income tax, the abolition of inheritance rights, the taking away of emigrants and rebels property, making all people have to work, State centralization of credit, centralization of communication and transport, appropriation of factories, combination of agriculture and manufacturing, elimination of the differences between the town and country, and free education for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Marx and Engels wrote the Communist Manifesto to explain the history of class struggles in Europe and how communism was the ultimate form of government meant to bring equality to society and end the oppressive rule of the rising Bourgeoisie class. For Marx, humans are rational beings. But in a bourgeoisie capitalist dominated society, reality has become distorted and diminished a once functioning society. Industrialization has created a society of working class citizens who are manipulated, easily exploited, and oppressed for monetary gains. This is counterintuitive for the advancement of society and a successful government and brings about struggles of class. Therefore Marx argues the working class should be in control of government, because they are the ones ho keep the bourgeoisie rich and the economy running. “Formation of the proletariat into a class, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy, conquest of political power by the proletariat” (Marx 14). Marx argues the average working class citizens are capable of governing the land and distributing wealth evenly amongst the people. Writing is simply not enough he calls for revolution in order to restore peace and end the impoverishment of many…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Communist Manifesto, written by Karl Marx is an economical and philosophical ideology that is centered on communism. Specifically, it is centered on the redistribution of wealth so that everyone in a specified nation or State is completely equal in wealth for the “betterment” of the society. This in theory eliminates the class system and as a result is intended to eliminate the oppression that comes along with the class separation and wage gap. Thankfully, for me this literary piece’s brilliance does not come simply from Marx’s economic ideals but instead it comes from the simple fact that it exists at all. What challenges me and forces me to strive towards betterment is that the Communist Manifesto serves as a reminder to me that it is…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Did Communism Fail

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Communism is a Karl Marx original, by advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs. Although Karl Marx political movement considers history in terms of a class conflict and revolutionary struggle. But in the end communism and socialism prevaled why it couldn't hold, because it had abolished free markets so that officials had no market prices to guide them in planning production. Even tho as history shows communism is the easiest system to sell to people who are poor, not because they are stupid and poor, its because communism for them was reasonable, fair, and workable. Even though the reality of communism are indeed workable,the only problem is the produce supre inefficient economies.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx in Soho

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Communism is a system of political and economic organization in which property is owned by the members of the community and all share in the common resources and wealth acquired (Ebrey et. al., 2005). It is a socioeconomic structure that promotes a society that has no class and state. Communism was also said to be the bloodiest form of regime since the people are ruled by fear. If they try to oppose the communist government, death awaits them. The government keeps the people in line by murdering those who dare question its leaders. The people were forced to work hard and they were intimidated to do so.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essentially, through involuntary inclusion into the capitalist system the numerous proletariat remained undeveloped, so by seizing the means of production through voluntary collective action they will flourish. (Singer, 1980) Economically, the redistribution of property and the subsequent founding of a socialist state would lead to an authoritarian political regime (Hayek, 1944), which would not be sustainable in the long run due to the ever evolving complexity of international relations that such states would have, provided that they choose not to pursue an isolationist economic rationale. (Bellamy,…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Karl Marx was a communist; he was a part of the ‘’perfect society’’. I am arguing against this because communism is wrong. It’s wrong because the communists can take your property for government purposes, and you can’t do anything about it. If you live in a communist country, you don’t have any rights, which I think is nuts. Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto, which explained his crazy theories.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In our increasingly liberal modern society, democratic and capitalistic ideals are taking over the world. Everyone strives for representation and expects their governments to work for their welfare. Many economists and eminent politicians support this ideal and comment on how it is ‘the way forward’. Assuming that this assumption is true, Communism as a political and economic concept in today's’ world is practically redundant and ineffective.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In December of 1991, the world watched in astonishment as the Soviet Union disintegrated into fifteen individual countries. This collapse was seen by the west as a triumph for freedom, victory for democracy over dictatorship, and an indication of the dominance of capitalism over socialism. The fall of the Berlin wall and the downfall of Stalinism regimes of Russia and Eastern Europe triggered a wave of ecstasy in the West. A lot of people nowadays argued that communism was dead. However, in order to understand the challenges in our global economic system, we should know that there are two important reasons as to why we should not rule out Marx and his dialectical reasons.…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were certain aspects of society and human nature Marx’s idea failed to address. For example, education in a capitalist system education would be provided for a price, thought by institutions trying to provide advantages over others, resulting in higher quality education. Education would be treated as an investment, a risk will be taken by paying for education, which later will result in higher pay. On the other hand, in a communist system, education would be free, and equal to everyone. But certain people will be forced to receive higher level education to work in higher positions.…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three Levels Of Communism

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When Karl Marx created communism, he hoped for it to result in classless societies where everyone possessed equal power. In reality, communism is one of the many forms government that is highly reliant on its social classes. It includes two levels: a working class and upper class. The working class toils under the dictator, completing everything for his or her benefit and the higher class consists of the government officials in the capital and the dictator alone that rule over the citizens. In contrast, the social classes of democracy consist of three levels, the upper class, the middle class, and the lower class.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx’s primary claim is that an individual’s moral, philosophical and religious ideas are reflections based on our material circumstance and that they are not autonomous driving forces in history as others have claimed. Marx concluded that ‘instead of shaping society, ideas were in fact shaped by society’ (Mann & Dann, 2005). By this he meant that the economic system of a society determines what values and principles are upheld. Therefore, an outdate society would value attributes such as honour and loyalty to keep people in line, whereas a capitalist society would value freedom and equality to keep the workforce as large and as mobile as possible to keep down wages. When a society’s economic conditions experience a fundamental change and a new class assumes supremacy after a political revolution has occurred and installed that leading class in power. Marx predicted that a communist revolution eliminating private property and the subjugation of one class by another would occur at the end of history society (Mann & Dann, 2005).…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx and Class Conflict

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The force transforming latent class membership into a struggle of classes is class interest. Out of similar class situations, individuals come to act similarly. They develop a mutual dependence, a community, a shared interest interrelated with a common income of profit or of wages. From this common interest classes are formed, and for Marx, individuals form classes to the extent that their interests engage them in a struggle with the opposite class.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In their writing the two most important terms are "socialist" and "communist”. When reading them, it is always important to know what the writer means by them. For Marx socialism was the more comprehensive term; communism was an advanced stage of socialism. Socialism would prepare the way by nationalizing the "means of production" (factories, farms, mines, transportation, etc.) and putting them under the control of those he viewed as the sole producers of wealth: the workers. He viewed political equality and freedom as incomplete (or even illusory) without economic equality. Therefore this redistribution of economic power was aimed at extending democracy far beyond the limits envisioned by earlier democratic revolutions. Social services like health, education, and housing would be provided free, but people would still be paid wages according to their work.…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    History of Karl Marx

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Despite what has been proclaimed and enacted in his name (later in life he would protest that he was not a "Marxist" as the term had come to be understood), Marxwas concerned ultimately with human freedom, reviving the ancient concept of communism,wherein human beings could fulfill their cooperative roles within society without fear of exploitation. He saw the historical stage of capitalism as the "insidious" antagonist of such freedom; insidious because unlike serfdom (capitalism's predecessor in the evolution of social relations) capitalism was (is?) able to perpetuate the illusion of freedom even though its raison d'etre relies on those who have nothing to sell but their labor and those, who through the power of capital and property, exploit such labor for profit. It is important to point out that Marx did not view capitalism as an aberration in society's evolution toward true freedom, but as a necessary historical stage in that evolution.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Karl Marx Communist Manifesto, he discusses his belief that with all of the Industrial Revolutions, and the stray away from traditional social order and agriculture, that the governments that supporting these revolutions is surely setting themselves up for, economic, social, and political failure. He makes his point very clear that the new machines and technological advancements during this time will negatively affect the working class. As the skilled laborers quit their trades and move to inner cities to get jobs in factories, there will surely be no one to teach or learn that trade therefor that trade becoming extinct. He also shows the bourgeois as the main reason for these new revolutions, and also how they are headed down a path toward communism. The workers will fall entrapped into their work, and after some time will feel they cannot leave nor complain of harsh conditions or low wages, due the need to provide for their family. Marx shows that this will short term benefit the bourgeois due to the increase demand for the goods and the low wages they are having to pay the workers, however long term this will bring them down. The reason he believes they will fall is due to workers only working to supply food and rent, therefor they wont be able to purchase any of the goods being made. He states that the machines doing all of the labor work will, in time, replace workers and the bourgeois will be making products for people that have no money to buy them. Marx states that if there is any hope for society that there must be a change back to the old ways of farming, cattle, and stopping external trade. It is the belief of Marx that if these changes aren’t made that we will also because a nation of one people and there will no longer be many different ideas, religions, and politics, which will lead to human extinction.…

    • 327 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays