Preview

Analyzing “Columbus, The Indians, and Human Progress” written by Howard Zinn and “The City on the Hill” written by Larry Schweikert and Allen Michael

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
685 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analyzing “Columbus, The Indians, and Human Progress” written by Howard Zinn and “The City on the Hill” written by Larry Schweikert and Allen Michael
Historical Perspective Assignment After reading the articles “Columbus, The Indians, and Human Progress” written by Howard Zinn and “The City on the Hill” written by Larry Schweikert and Allen Michael I have analyzed three specific topics/concepts that have been presented by both authors. The first topic that I observed was Christopher Columbus. Howard Zinn’s article was mainly focused on Columbus while Larry S. and Allen M.’s article covered many explorers including Columbus. Howard Zinn more wrote his view on Columbus as a story as the other authors wrote a lot of facts and what you would call “boring” information. Both of the authors included gory details of Columbus’s expedition which didn’t create the same “heroic” effect that I learnt from earlier years. These two inserts also might differ because one is a Patriot’s History of the United States and the other is a People’s History of the United States.
My Second topic that I noticed after reading both inserts is how these early explorers changed the world in different ways. In the insert of “The City on the Hill” It describes many expeditions. When Marco Polo and others traveled to China they brought back tales of wealth and unusual goods. Portugal explorers dispatched ships to Africa and brought back ivory and gold then transported and sold slaves to varies Mediterranean estates. Christopher Columbus discovered Islands in the Bahamas, Cuba, and a “New World”. On the other hand the insert form “Columbus, The Indians, and Humans Progress” talks about how Columbus explored the Islands of the Bahamas and discovered the traits of the Arawaks Indians. Columbus brought back slaves to England. Both inserts explain what these explorers’ intentions were and what they brought back. Overall, these articles differ because one is mainly on Columbus and the other is on all explorers.
Finally my last topic is on the concept of greed. Greed came into both of these articles quite a few times. In the second paragraph of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eliot Morrison and Howard Zinn both wrote about their view on Christopher Columbus while Morrison left out the bad and see the good and still admire him. Howard Zinn wants to uncover the truth about Christopher Columbus and how even though he’s portrayed as a hero on history book he’s actually not. He also focuses on analyzing Christopher Columbus as not a here even though history textbook portrays him to be a hero and discover America. Zinn main point in the text was how the student are more likely to portrait him as a hero when reading just one page about him in a history textbook.…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Who “discovered” America? Christopher Columbus. Native Americans were already there. 1492. Dutch were the technical discoverers. NA (Russians) came on Bering Strait.ICE AGE. 2. How did the Spanish treat the Native Americans? Results of the European contact with the Natives? Relationship with the Iroquois Confederacy? ∙ Treated badly. As less than people. Massacred and enslaved. ∙ Result of European contact with the Natives? Death to many natives. Pizarro crushed incas. (befriended them and took all their gold. 1532) ∙ The 160,000 Spaniards subjugated (or made of lesser value) millions of Indians. ∙ Columbus brought sugarcane to Hispaniola­ thrives in warm climate ∙ Spanish couldn’t find gold ­> Roman Catholic missions became the most important thing for Spain in New World (God and Glory and Gold) ∙ Encomienda System: Allowed the government to give Indians to certain colonists in return for the promise to try to Christianize the NA. (Slavery on sugar plantation disguised as missionary work) ∙ Iroquois at first able to fend of Europeans for over a century ∙ Mestizos: plus result of Spanish colonization; mixed Spanish and native American ∙ ALL THE SPANISH WANTED WAS GOLD (and sometimes fountain of youth) ∙ Matrilineal culture and authority on women (NA) ∙ Iroquois became a confederacy of 5 tribes because of English murdering Indian tribes and taking their land ∙ Human superiority of nature (E) vs. not altering the land and don’t destroy nature ∙ Food was most important gift to European world ∙ Disease is the biggest NA killer (unintentional of Spanish to kill 90% of pop) Columbian Exchange: Columbus’s discovery initiated an explosion in international commerce, or globalization. 3. The motivation for English colonization? Most consequential English Settlement for the further development of the English colonies? Relations with the Powhatans? ∙ English eventually isolated NA (unlike Spanish) ∙…

    • 5318 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But saying that lends some sort of pity towards Columbus which Zinn doesn’t and considers him a genocidist for what he did to the Arawak. Now on the other side of the tracks you have Larry Schweikart who wrote “A Patriot's History of The United States”, compared to Zinn's almost 20 pages on Columbus wrote about five paragraphs on Columbus calming him as a hero and a esteemed admiral of the sea. Now the more credible argument in the case of Columbus’s villainy or heroism, is Zinn his take saying that Columbus’s was a murderer and killer is much moire credible than that of Schweikart's saying he is a hero. This is because of the fact that in Schweikart's book he leaves out that fact that reports of post-Colombian expeditions say that there were no original or descendants of original Arawak living on the island where Columbus landed. Meaning that his genocide of not only the lives but the culture of the Arawak left no way for their traditions or their names to be carried on after he was done using them to achieve his own means. So in conclusion not only Zinn's better…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are some small differences that these two works carry. Columbus starts out each entry with the day that it began on. Like in the following passage, Monday Nov. 12th. They sailed from the port of the river... (114). Champlain did not do it this way he simply stated facts from day to day. The way he writes it is like he is telling a story while Columbus is giving detailed information. The reason this was done may have something to do with the rulers that these two men were under. Columbus had to keep a detailed record for the ruler of Spain at the time. Champlain may not have had to do this being as Jacques Cartier had led an expedition through the same area for the French a few years earlier. The background of these two explorers definitely showed up in these journals.…

    • 808 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Colomlubus

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Columbus, The Indians, and Human Progress” from A People’s History of the United States. By Howard Zinn…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Howard Zinn covers early Native American civilization in North America and the Bahamas, the genocide and slavery committed by the crew of Christopher Columbus, and the violent colonization by early settlers. While Paul Johnson stated that “the creation of the United States of America is the greatest of all human adventures”. Their points of views are completely 2 different stories.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Howard Zinn Critique

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Although Zinn’s view is different, it can’t be considered alternative history because the history is the same but Zinn decides to include many details and reasons that other historians have missed. In the first chapter of A People’s History of the United States, Zinn critiques Columbus’ expedition, arrival in America, encounter with the Native Americans, and treatment of the Natives. Zinn includes details of Columbus’ report to Spain such as “The Indians… ‘are so naive and so free with their possessions that no one who has not witnessed them would believe it. When you ask for something they have, they never say no. To the contrary, they offer to share with anyone’… he would bring them from his next voyage ‘as much gold as they need … and as many slaves as they ask.’… ‘Thus the eternal God, our Lord, gives victory to those who follow his way over apparent impossibilities.’ ”(Zinn, 5). Zinn acknowledges that Columbus said exactly this in his report, proving that A People’s History of the United States isn’t any sort of alternative history. Zinn also includes important details and excerpt like “If you were a colonist, you…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, In Zinn's view, Columbus's attitude as the initial point of entry into the Americas led directly to years of slavery, rape, murder, and pillage, as well as the gold fever that struck subsequent expeditions. He points out the documentation of atrocity by Bartolome de las Casas, and how this part of history is often ignored in favor of the Progressive and Industrial archetype. Then in Foner’s point of view Columbus was a great discoverer, the historical development set in motion or symbolized by Columbus's encounter with the New World produced both great good and great evil for different peoples in different parts of the world. Foner's view is more lenient, but still critical, he said “progress sometimes cannot be made without sacrifice, but we must remember and learn from the past instead of ignoring it”. I feel like they are…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zinn Howard Questions Ch 1-6

    • 3698 Words
    • 15 Pages

    1. Zinn’s main purpose for writing A People’s History of the United States is to show history from the viewpoint of others.…

    • 3698 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, Columbus and Equiano are very different . Their stories or journals were written in a time and conditions that truly detailed their writings. It is very hard to find similarities because the two had a very different life from one another and this evident in their writings. There experiences made them and made their writings, giving you biased and factual information. This makes both writings very different in what their meaning was and what it is that they were trying to get…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Considering groups, the Native American, and the men of Columbus, and the other Conquistadors all had tremendous impacts in very negative way with each other I would have to choose Native Americans. Prior to what could be perceived by some as an invasion by Columbus and The Conquistadors , the Native Americans were able to enjoy the purity, and beauty of the Americas with no slavery, invader battles, landing taking and diseases they must have had a simpler life of living off the lands and flourishing. Not to say the natives had a perfect life as they would have had internal strife and hardships over the years, pre-invaders life was better than the aftermath. Being one of the “invaders” it appears by most of the readings they had a horrible trip to get to Americas and their hardships of trying to establish settlements was a pricey endeavor with nightmare living conditions and being so far away from their homelands it was no vacation. The “invaders” annulation of cultures and natives homelands does and would not have been my choice to live my life.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From these journals, we see the perspective of the American men who journeyed west and how their presence effected trade relations and peace with the Native American tribes. Yes, many argue that the journals, and the expedition itself, lack importance due to individuals moving west, even before the expedition returned to St. Louis. However, from the evidence provided in the words of Meriwether Lewis and William Clark, historians can see the effects of the interaction with the Corps of Discovery and Native Americans and the suppression of Sacajawea’s perspective not recorded in the journals. This expedition is a part of American history, whether or not people enjoy the story or simply want to forget. Americans need to address and confront the truth; not disregard the facts because it makes them uncomfortable, like it seems to do to Stephen Ambrose. America cannot be the land of the free if the American government continues to lie to its people and native tribes that the government once made promises to. America needs to apologize and begin to make amends for what occurred during the Lewis and Clark Expedition, giving Native Americans an ultimatum to either: assimilate, relocate, or face death for not cooperating, and giving Sacajawea a false voice furthering their longing for Manifest Destiny and Imperialist ideologies. The government could have brought Native American’s on the journey of progress but instead let racial superiority exist between Americans and Natives. We as a nation, by studying the negative affects during and after the expeditions return to the United States, can begin to mend and abolish hostility that the expedition caused. Overall, working…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tell us about the topic you are choosing for the third paper and include some sources you might want to use for the paper.…

    • 516 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Columbus Exchange

    • 1855 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Throughout history there has been an ongoing argument of what really happened during the Christopher Columbus time period and the years leading up to this voyage to "the New World". People argue if the land was untouched and if it was not, were the people who were already occupying it uncivilized or was that just the thoughts and interpretations of the new settlers, and most importantly, who really deserved the credit of the New World's success. Two sources that argue the traditional thoughts portrayed in history books. These two sources are one a National Geographic movie called "America before Columbus," and Alan Brinkley's Unfinished Nation: A Concise History of the American People. So what do these two sources say about what really happened?…

    • 1855 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the article of Columbus, the Indians and Human Progress, Zinn writes on how he believes society learns the history of Columbus and his discoveries.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays