Preview

Animal Bill of Rights

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
448 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Animal Bill of Rights
Henry Rose
Mrs. Pagani
Period III ERWC
21 October 2013
“Body Paragraphs” PARA 1:
I believe animals do not need a Bill of Rights because they already have plethora of laws that protect all of their basic needs. For example, Germany has already passed laws to protect the basic rights of Ape’s. In the article “primates” they said, “The Green Party in Germany is preparing two bills supporting the Great Ape Project”(Yong). Another way that animals already have their rights protected is, Dogs have shelters and pounds to go to if they have no home or are left on the street, you are also not allowed to beat them or have dog fights with them. The human society states that, “Dogfighting is a felony offense in all 50 states…and… dogs used in these events often die of blood loss, shock, dehydration, exhaustion, or infection hours or even days after the fight”(Humane Society). PARA 2: Another reason that animals don’t need a Bill of Rights is because they are a huge factor in medical advancements. For example, one of the animals that would most likely get the most “rights” would be a dog, this would ban experiments on dogs that are critical for the benefits to humans. For example, “dogs were vital to the development of angioplasty as a treatment or preventive measure for heart attacks and other heart conditions in humans”(SUBR). We must do experiments on animals first for the well being of humans. In “primates” Yong says, “ testing to find a cure cannot be accessed by experiments on or with humans”(Yong).

PARA 3: The last reason that animals don’t need a Bill of Rights, is that humans come first over animals with low cognitive ability. For example, they talk about how a fish can remember its path to run away from predators. But that doesn’t prove that they feel pain and shows that they really aren’t smart at all. They say, “they can learn geometrical relationships and landmarks”(Braithwaite). Another reason is that we haven’t even defined pain for ourselves,



Cited: Braithwaite, Victoria. "Hooked on a Myth." Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles Times, 08 Oct. 2006. Web. 21 October 2013. Faron, Chris. "Dogfighting Fact Sheet : The Humane Society of the United States." RSS. Human Society, 2 Nov. 2009. Web. 21 October 2013. News. "How Animals Help." Welcome to SUBR. SUBR, Web. 21 October 2013. Rifkin, Jeremy. "A Change of Heart About Animals." A Change of Heart About Animals. Common Dreams, 1 Sept. 2003. Web. 21 October 2013. Yong, Ed. "Seed Magazineabout." Of Primates and Personhood § SEEDMAGAZINE.COM. SEED Magazine, 12 Dec. 2008. Web. 21 Oct. 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Everyone has their own perspective of how animals should be treated the majority of people are on the no rights side. In Gary L Francione, professor of law at Rutgers University, and Anna E Charlton, adjunct professor of law at Rutgers University essay “The Case Against Pets” says that once you own something it becomes property no matter how you treat it since you have the power to do what is right and what is wrong. In worldnetdaily.com in 2003 essay “No rights for Animals” says that animals are somewhat worthy of human compassion, kindness, and care by nature but not of any human rights at all. Gary L Francione, Anna E Charlton and worldnetdaily.com in 2003 both explain how to define animals right before saying if animals even have to be…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals should have a Bill of Rights because they have sentiment, feel suffering, and are being forced into excruciating procedures. Animals should have the potential to stand up for themselves and make their own decisions because they are just as superior as human beings. People of El Monte, I encourage you to vote yes to an animal bill of rights because it will help prolong the lives of animals…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Animals deserve to be treated with love and care just like any other species.” True. However, to what extent are we willing to be compared to animals? In the article “A Change of Heart About Animals” Jeremy Rifkin sells the idea that science proves everyday that we aren’t much different from any other animal therefore he believes that, just like humans, animals should have a bill of rights. I say this is too extreme and completely unnecessary.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals and humans were created to coexist on this earth and therefore should receive fair treatment. Many cannot fathom the idea of initiating legal rights for animals. Some may even perceive it as absurd to dedicate and focus time on non-human animals. The main problem is that humans have advanced significantly, establishing a complex intellect that other species lack. Humans possess many capabilities that are distinct from those of others.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Non-humans has been there longer than humans in the history. Humans have taken for granted of the non humans because we humans are the most dominated in the food web. Also humans don’t realize how much pain we could cause to non humans. Both article “A Change of Heart about Animal” by Jeremy Rifkin and “Hooked on a myth” by Victoria Braithwaite states that humans don’t really care for animals and want change to treat animals fairly. However, humans do not feel any type of emotions, take for granted and treated them unright; therefore Bill of Rights for the for the U.S should be created for animals because they could be happy, safe and treat them right.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals deserve rights because just like humans, they feel excruciating pain, suffer and have feelings. One would argue that animals don’t experience emotions? But the answer is of course they do. It is emotions that allow animals to display various behavior patterns. According to the theory of utilitarianism, all sentient beings should be given consideration in the society and this includes both animals and humans. Also, animals cannot speak for themselves and for this reason they should be treated equally, protected and given the same respect as human beings. Peter singer’s approach also supports the argument on equal consideration in that animals deserve the same respect as human beings but just in a different view. In today’s society humans exploit animals for milk, meat, fur, scientific experimentation etc. and animals are constantly injured or killed. Their pain and sufferings should be taken into consideration, as this unjust treatment is morally unacceptable. Similarly speciesism is an…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the article “ A change of Heart about Animals” by Rifkin, he states “ They feel pain, suffer, and experiences stress, affection, excitement and even love--and these findings are changing how we view animals.” These characteristics are just like any human being they feel pain just as we feel pain, they suffer just like we do too therefore i agree that they should have the same rights as us humans. Although many other people might say they're just animals but they realize they are species just like us humans.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    When the topic of Canadian rights and freedoms is discussed it is quite facile to state that we are well protected by legislation. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms secures our democratic rights, equality rights, legal rights as well as freedom of religion, and freedom of expression. Although, it is quite unfortunate that Animals are not given a legislation to protect them as well. It is true that they do not have a voice but even without saying a word it is visible that they are being stripped of the rights that they are entitled to. Animals do not exist for the purpose of clothing us, entertaining us and for testing out dangerous products before we get the final result.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people believe that animals have feelings and that they are able to feel what a human feels such love, suffering, stress even some people think that we share similar characteristics. in the article "A Change of Heart About Animals '' the author Jeremy Rifkin argument that animals are the same as human beings and that we should also treat them with love and respect. For some reasons, activists and some law schools believe in animals rights and they want to protect animals but if there were a bill of rights for animals some certain things would change for a reason some would not be benefit from this. Pass a bill of right it is not a good idea because it would change many things.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals should not have rights because humans are superior over animals. Humans are in the top 10% of the food chain that is between all the animals in the world. Thus meaning that if animals were given rights then there would be a shortage of food in the world. if there is a shortage of food for humans there would nothing else for us to eat in the world. The animals life expectancy would also grow meaning that the amount of animals would multiply and there would be a huge surplus of animals and no food for the humans to consume.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animal Rights Final Paper

    • 5494 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Animal Rights is the affection and kind treatment offered to every animal without discrimination. Animal Rights involves treating animals with respect and investing in their best interests, regardless if the animal is “cute” or useful to humans.vi The importance of Animal Rights is to protect animals from being abused and exploited. Animal Rights also protects endangered species from extinction. According to Tom Regan, “Animal Rights is to treat humans and other…

    • 5494 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Rights

    • 793 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animals on a daily basis all over the world are being mistreated and abused by many people that do not care for them. There are very few people attempting to protect these animals, whether they are domestic animals, farm animals, or wildlife animals. More attention should be drawn to the treatment of animals because even if we do have laws for animals and for their well being, many people still do not follow these laws. The laws already established for animals should be enforced, because I do agree that animals need protection, as in free from any harm done towards them purposely, but to have a Bill of Rights specifically made for animals seems extreme.…

    • 793 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What is the moral status of non-human animals? Do they have rights? This question, and all of it's complex entities, stands at the forefront among the most debated and philosophically dissected issues. To prove whether or not animals have rights without a doubt would forever change our treatment and use of animals as well as the world in which we live. The consequences of a definitive answer to the animal rights debate are numerous and profound which is why the issue continues to be argued for or against with the harshest of scrutiny. It is the goal of this essay to present and analyze justifiable argument for and against the concept of animal rights. Tom Regan is widely regarded as one of the greatest assets for the defense of animal rights. Carl Cohen denies the existence of said right. While they stand on opposite poles of this issue, they both agree that "What we conclude about animal rights will have consequences for the food we eat and the clothes we wear, and it will have direct bearing on the kinds of science we think morally justifiable."(viii)…

    • 2605 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Rights. Essay

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The idea that we are all born with rights, such as life, power of choice and happiness are the main aspects of our daily lives. However, many of us humans inconsiderately forget that animals also deserve these equal rights also. Animals are entitled to a painless, content life in their own natural environments. Animals should also not be exploited for experimental use nor detained in small cages. These actions are simply injustice and deprive the poor animals of their well-deserved rights. I firmly believe that this is unacceptable and we humans should find humane alternatives to these filthy acts of harm immediately!…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals Have Souls!

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Humans have stronger rights than animals since we can reason rationally. We use animals to eat them, play with them, and wear their skins. Most vital, we use them as test subjects for medical purposes. The research has led us to discoveries which have saved millions of lives. The outcomes have led to immunizations against polio, mumps, hepatitis, diphtheria, and rubella; which have saved countless lives. (Gale, 2)…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays