Animal Captivity In Zoos Essay

Countless individuals have fond memories of zoo or aquarium visits, circus shows, and other entertainment outlets involving captive animals; however, the enjoyment of these outlets dissipates rapidly once one looks further behind the scenes of these organizations. Places like SeaWorld, Ringling Brother’s Circus, and countless zoos across America are notorious for their mistreatment of animals. Throughout the last several decades, “organized amusement zones” have become a pivotal source of recreation and leisure worldwide. When the first SeaWorld opened in San Diego back in 1959, it rapidly became etched into the city’s landscape, and its popularity escalated the chain construction of replica parks across America. The undeviating demand of these parks intended for entertainment often surpass the harmful effects such locations can create on their inhabitant organisms (Hogan 772). Captivity in zoos, circuses, and other entertainment outlets have been shown to be highly detrimental to
Hardly any zoos register their animals on an international species database and the majority of animals located within zoos are not part of an endangered species at all. Zoos can be more accurately depicted as collections of intriguing species rather than actual havens or homes for them. Even while situated in the best circumstances, no zoo can truly replicate wild habitats. Animals who are captive bred in zoos or otherwise typically cannot function properly or in the wild as they have not gained the experience of their wild counterparts ("Zoos: Pitiful Prisons"). Animals tend to untimely perish within zoos for having been prohibited from their natural and important actions such as flying, roaming, choosing a partner, and being with others of their own kind. The decrease in lifespans among animals located within zoos surpasses any increases zoo conservation efforts in the last