Preview

Animals Have Rights Too

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1538 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Animals Have Rights Too
Research Essay Outline

I. Introduction

A. Definition of animal rights-the belief that non-human animals have interests and rights similar to humans and deserve the same respect

B. Background information on the issue

C. The discussion of animal rights and whether or not animals deserve the same rights as humans has been prevalent in society since the early 1800s, but animals do reserve the same rights to a life free from the terror of being hunted and the pain of abuse and experimentation; therefore, the solution is to create more laws in favor of animals’ rights and to prosecute those who choose to ignore these laws.

II. History A. Research says each side tries to goad the other in an effort to undermine them B. Research says the side for animal rights has been fighting for their cause since the 19th century C. Opposition

III. Addressing the Issue
A. Research says animal rights activists have a valid point

B. Research says animal rights are not always enough

C. Opposition

IV. Animal Rights vs. Human Rights & Facts A. Research says animals have enough mental and emotional faculties to deserve the same rights as humans B. Research says the effort to preserve animal lives has been by and large very successful. C. Opposition

V. Conclusion A. Animals deserve the right to live their lives free from hunting, abuse and experimentation

B. Solution-stricter laws and harsher punishments

Animal Rights are defined as the belief that non-human animals have interests and rights similar to humans and deserve the same respect. Activists and activist groups such as PETA and the ASPCA have been fighting for the equal treatment of animals since the early 19th century and continue to do so in the present day. There are two sides to every argument and there are people who do not believe that animals deserve the same rights



Cited: Driscoll, Sally, and David C. Morley. "Point: Hunting Provides Numerous Benefits to Hunters, Wildlife, and the Environment." Points of View: Hunting (2009): 2. Points of View Reference Center. EBSCO. Web. 27 Oct. 2010. Lee, M., and C. Ames Cushman. "Counterpoint: Animals Do Not Have Rights." Points of View: Animal Rights (2009): 3. Points of View Reference Center. EBSCO. Web. 27 Oct. 2010. Rich, Alex K., and Geraldine Wagner. "Animal Rights: An Overview." Points of View: Animal Rights (2009): 1. Points of View Reference Center. EBSCO. Web. 27 Oct. 2010. Whittaker, Anne, and David C. Morley. "Point: Endangered Species Should be Protected." Points of View: Endangered Species (2009): 2. Points of View Reference Center. EBSCO. Web. 27 Oct. 2010. Witherbee, Amy. "Counterpoint: When Animal Rights are Not Enough." Points of View: Animal Rights (2009): 6. Points of View Reference Center. EBSCO. Web. 27 Oct. 2010.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Regan, Tom. "Animal Rights, Human Wrongs." Forming a Critical Perspective. Boston, MA: Pearson Learning Solutions, 2010. 336-40. Print.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Revolutionary war was a time where the Patriots broke away from the British. In Chains by Laurie Haldane Anderson,and in Charles kuralt's “Independence Hall” both Isabel and the patriots faced obstacle before attaining their goals. Some of the conflicts they faced similar and others were different. In Chains and “Independence Hall”, there were external and internal obstacles.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    James, Missy and Merickel, Alan P. Alex Epstein and Yaron Brook, The Evil of Animal “Rights”, Reading Literature and Writing Argument, Fourth Edition by, pg. 604-605.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals deserve rights because just like humans, they feel excruciating pain, suffer and have feelings. One would argue that animals don’t experience emotions? But the answer is of course they do. It is emotions that allow animals to display various behavior patterns. According to the theory of utilitarianism, all sentient beings should be given consideration in the society and this includes both animals and humans. Also, animals cannot speak for themselves and for this reason they should be treated equally, protected and given the same respect as human beings. Peter singer’s approach also supports the argument on equal consideration in that animals deserve the same respect as human beings but just in a different view. In today’s society humans exploit animals for milk, meat, fur, scientific experimentation etc. and animals are constantly injured or killed. Their pain and sufferings should be taken into consideration, as this unjust treatment is morally unacceptable. Similarly speciesism is an…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Epstein, Alex and Yaron Brook. "The Evil of Animal "Rights"." James, Missy and Alan P. Merickel. qtd in Reading Literature and Writing Argument. Upper Saddle River: Prentice hall, 2008. 604-605. Text. 8 September 2012.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tom Regan's Position

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An Argumentative essay that looks at and breaks down the philosophical difference between Tom Regan’s position on Animal rights and, Peter Singer’s position on Animal liberation as a basis for better treatment of animals.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    All animals should have the right to roam freely without being pursued and/or killed. Hunters cause injuries, pain and suffering to defenseless animals, they destroy their families and home, and leave…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why should the rights that were fought for by our late independent heroes and civil right activists be extended to non-human animals that could not socially speak for themselves? Since animals do not have the capacity to personally fight for their rights, granting what humans had put in their blood for to enjoy to non-human animals will be a scenario of robbing Peter to pay Paul and hence an injustice to humans. Therefore animal rights movement is simply a misguided attempt to force people to grant animals the same qualities, needs and desires as human beings. While this movement is born out of kindness and sympathy, I think it is completely misguided because non-human animals are in actual sense, equal to human beings and hence do not deserve equal right as enjoyed by human…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals should not have rights also because animals don’t respect our rights. As humans if one…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If humans have been given rights of their own, animals should have rights, too. Animals don’t deserve to be experimented on. They feel pain just as humans. We shouldn’t take animals for granted. They have a huge part in our world’s natural cycle. In Lisa Kemmerer’s article titled “Animal Rights” she asserts the issue of what defines animal rights. She addresses the fact that animals need rights just as humans. Ms. Kemmerer subtopics consist of the challenges that follow animal rights, the importance of animal rights, and the reasons why we need to consider standing up for animal rights. As Lisa Kemmerer states, “Animal rights is a simple idea because, at the most basic level, it means only that animal share a right to be treated with respect. It is a profound idea because its implications are far-reaching” (275). It is very important to acknowledge that animals need to be treated with respect. Animals are unable to voice their own rights. It is our duty to use our own rights to advocate the rights of animals. Without advocates for the rights of animals, our economic system may drop from unlawful standards. As a second writer suggests that as human we have moral obligations to not judge one by their outward appearance, skin colour, and ethical background yet we seem to judge animals without considering their feelings (274). We have such an impact on animals that we must stand up for animals and protect them. If we don’t take a…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Rights Definition

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Definition- Animal rights are the philosophy of allowing non-human animals to have the most basic rights that all sentient beings desire: the freedom to live a natural life free from human exploitation, unnecessary pain and suffering, and premature death.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Cavalieri, Paola. (2001) the animal question, why nonhuman animals deserve human rights. New York, NY: Oxford University Press…

    • 2250 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Bill Of Rights

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Now in my opinion, I believe that animals should have an official “Bill of Rights”. They have emotions and show signs of intelligence. I believe that we need to draft a legal “Bill of Rights” for animals. Simple laws should be, and already are, in place to protect animals to some extent but there is more that could be done. Currently, the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) remains the only federal law that regulates the treatment of animals [1]. I believe that the AWA is enough protection for animals, we don’t need additional legislation on top of this and similar…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determining the rights of non-human animals and deciding how to treat them may not be a choice available to our human society. As an advocate for the rights of animals, Tom Reganʻs three main goals are to abandon the use of animals in any scientific research, discontinue all commercial animal agriculture, and to completely terminate both commercial and sport animal hunting. To support these intentions, Regan argues that every human and non-human animal possesses inherent value, which makes them all more than a physical object or vessel. He then states that possessing inherent value allows every human and non-human to have rights of their own. To further his argument, Regan claims that the any human and non-human retaining rights requires equal treatment and respect from others. To conclude his argument, Regan states that due to these reasons, non-human animals cannot be treated as resources and must be treated by humans as equals. In this paper, I object to Reganʻs third premise, which states that non-human and human animals must be treated as equals and with respect, because our communication barrier with non-human animals restricts us from determining their notion of equal treatment or respect, and that attempting to do so could…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals don't have rights because animals do not have the cognitive ability or moral judgment that humans do and because of this they have been treated differently than humans by nearly every culture throughout recorded history. Also if we granted animals rights, all humans would have to become vegetarians, and hunting would need to be outlawed. Therefore if animals had rights then we wouldn’t be able to hunt the animals so that means that the animals would overpopulate and we would die. My last reason why animals don't have rights is because animals are wild and would wreck towns or states. Those are some reasons why animals don't and shouldn't have rights.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics