Preview

Animal Rights Final Research Paper

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2250 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Animal Rights Final Research Paper
Animal Rights Final Research Paper Franco Pacheco ENGL-135 Prof. Gurin DeVry University December 13, 2012

Animal rights

The idea of animal rights is not new. Through the 18th and 19th Century philosophers like Rousseau, Kant, Bentham, and Schopenhauer have produced different arguments in favor of the treatment of animals. Animal rights is the idea that nonhuman animals are entitled to the possession of their own lives and that they should be afforded the same consideration as the similar interests of human beings. All animals are equal in the sense that they all can sense pain and suffering however as far as treating them like humans, I do not think so. Humans have been eating meat for as long as we have been on this earth and there is nothing wrong with that. That does not mean people enjoy killing them for pleasure, their lives are taking for our survival. Eating meat is not wrong as long as we are conscious of their contribution to humankind over the years, providing us with transportation, food, clothing, and companionship. Torturing and killing animals for pleasure is wrong, however, eating their meat moderately for survival is not. By the beginning of the 18th century, writers began to discuss animal feelings of pain and suffering, vivisection, and the cruel treatment of animals raised and slaughtered for food. All animals have the same capacity for suffering, but how we see them differs and that determines what we will tolerate happening to them. Most people are not capable of killing what they eat with their own hands but if is cooked and served; there are no thoughts of how or where it came from. Over 9 billion chickens, pigs, cattle,



References: Cavalieri, Paola. (2001) the animal question, why nonhuman animals deserve human rights. New York, NY: Oxford University Press Grillo, Alexander, (August 15, 2012), Five Reasons Why Meat-Eating Cannot Be Considered a ‘Personal Choice’ Guither, Harold D. (1998) Animal rights, History and scope of a radical social movement. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press Issitt, Micah & Newton, Heather (2011), p2-2, 1p - Animals Deserve the Same Rights as Humans. http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy.devry.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pwh&AN=26608510&site=pov-live Rich, Alex & Wagner Geraldine (2011), p1-1, 1p Points of View: Animal Rights: An Overview. April 12, 2011. American Humane Association hails ‘yes’ vote on humane standards for poultry in Washington http://www.americanhumane.org/animals/animal-welfare-news/american-humane-association-hails-yes-vote.html Animal Rights and Human Social Issues David A. Nibert, Wittenberg University (1994) http://www.animalsandsociety.org/assets/library/283_s222.pdf Isacat, Ben (2008) How to do Animal Rights - First published on the Web: April 2008.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Regan, Tom. "Animal Rights, Human Wrongs." Forming a Critical Perspective. Boston, MA: Pearson Learning Solutions, 2010. 336-40. Print.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jeremy Rifkin is an American writer, public speaker, and activist who wrote a meaningfully dense article for the Los Angeles Times titled "A Change Of Heart About Animals." His article defends animal rights and disputes many myths regarding animals. Rifkin argues that animals do have a sense of individualism, they experience emotions, they learn from past experiences, and that “They are more like us than we imagined” (). After reading the article, I can personally say that I agree with Rifkin, albeit my only problem is drawing the line between advocating for animals rights and extremism.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rhetoric of the Op Ed Page

    • 4651 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Rifkin, Jeremy. “A Change of Heart About Animals.” Los Angeles Times 1 Sept. 2003: B15.…

    • 4651 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The general public as well as animals are put at a severe disadvantage as a result of the rules created by the politically elite. Those who are vulnerable in society: animals deemed useful and people who are economically disadvantaged, experience the most severe injustice, in part due to inadequate representation. There is no perceptible correlation between legislature, and mercy. The social justice movement is as strong as ever, and the discrepancy between laws passed and the need for basic human and animal rights has become more ubiquitous in modern culture. Bryan Stevenson’s Just Mercy, Una Chadhuri and Holly Hughes’s Animal Acts, and multiple articles that identify key issues pertaining to animal and human rights. As illustrated through…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    James, Missy and Merickel, Alan P. Alex Epstein and Yaron Brook, The Evil of Animal “Rights”, Reading Literature and Writing Argument, Fourth Edition by, pg. 604-605.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Personhood for Primates

    • 2464 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Floria, Gwen. "Legal Activism on Behalf of Animals Gathering Momentum." Houston Chronicle (January 9, 2000): 21.…

    • 2464 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Epstein, Alex and Yaron Brook. "The Evil of Animal "Rights"." James, Missy and Alan P. Merickel. qtd in Reading Literature and Writing Argument. Upper Saddle River: Prentice hall, 2008. 604-605. Text. 8 September 2012.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animals from creation have been an essential integral part of human beings. They have frequently been, either directly or indirectly, used by humans to achieve their needs. Hence they are important part and great asset to humans. These animals do have lives different from that of humans and equally have some similar characteristics with humans like emotional feelings. This very fact puts humans in a difficult position of determining the amount of respect and regard that should be accorded to the animals. Some people agitate that animals should be granted same equal rights as human beings. Inasmuch as I quite agree that animals should be granted some rights in order to be free from cruel treatments by humans, the issue of granting them equal full rights as enjoyed by humans should not come up. An objective review of such factors as tradition, cultural believes, religious, socio-economic, and medical as well as salient natural features that distinguish animals from humans like morality, and ability to…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animal Rights Final Paper

    • 5494 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Animal Rights is the affection and kind treatment offered to every animal without discrimination. Animal Rights involves treating animals with respect and investing in their best interests, regardless if the animal is “cute” or useful to humans.vi The importance of Animal Rights is to protect animals from being abused and exploited. Animal Rights also protects endangered species from extinction. According to Tom Regan, “Animal Rights is to treat humans and other…

    • 5494 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determining the rights of non-human animals and deciding how to treat them may not be a choice available to our human society. As an advocate for the rights of animals, Tom Reganʻs three main goals are to abandon the use of animals in any scientific research, discontinue all commercial animal agriculture, and to completely terminate both commercial and sport animal hunting. To support these intentions, Regan argues that every human and non-human animal possesses inherent value, which makes them all more than a physical object or vessel. He then states that possessing inherent value allows every human and non-human to have rights of their own. To further his argument, Regan claims that the any human and non-human retaining rights requires equal treatment and respect from others. To conclude his argument, Regan states that due to these reasons, non-human animals cannot be treated as resources and must be treated by humans as equals. In this paper, I object to Reganʻs third premise, which states that non-human and human animals must be treated as equals and with respect, because our communication barrier with non-human animals restricts us from determining their notion of equal treatment or respect, and that attempting to do so could…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Circus Animal Cruelty

    • 2767 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Newkirk, I. (2009). The PETA Practical Guide to Animal Rights. New York: St. Martin 's Press.…

    • 2767 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To sum up, although some people argue killing animals for research and food is ethical, I would argue there is sufficient evidence to demonstrate that this is not the case, and, therefore, steps must be taken to improve the rights of…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Research Essay OutlineI. IntroductionA. Definition of animal rights-the belief that non-human animals have interests and rights similar to humans and deserve the same respectB. Background information on the issueC. The discussion of animal rights and whether or not animals deserve the same rights as humans has been prevalent in society since the early 1800s, but animals do reserve the same rights to a life free from the terror of being hunted and the pain of abuse and experimentation; therefore, the solution is to create more laws in favor of animals’ rights and to prosecute those who choose to ignore these laws.II. HistoryA. Research says each side tries to goad the other in an effort to undermine themB. Research says the side for animal rights has been fighting for their cause since the 19th centuryC. OppositionIII. Addressing the IssueA. Research says animal rights activists have a valid point…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals Right

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cited: Lin, Doris. “Protecting Animals ' Moral Status and Moral Rights.” Animal Rights 9:6 (2008): 721-725. Print.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "What is man without the beast? If the beast were gone, man would die from a great loneliness of spirit. For whatever happens to the beast soon happens to man" (Chief Seattle). While much has been done to protect animals, it is nowhere near what needs to be done to secure their inhabitance on earth and give them their rights. Animals have nerves so they can feel pain and they do suffer so is it right to put them through that by experimenting on them. Additionally if more of the world 's animals are not protected a lot more will be extinct in the coming years. Finally hunting, in almost all areas, is no longer a way to gain food as it used to be, it is now just done for pure sport or "fun". Should animals have to suffer just to benefit a single race of beings? And what does it feel like to be hunted down in terror and then torn apart while still alive?…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics