anything, rather they just are able to make a decision because there is one to be made. The difference lies in the intention of life when humans and animals were created as animals were not created to follow God. What is hard to distinguish from a naturalistic standpoint is the difference between the mind and the brain because the mind is not a physical thing. It is abstract, and it only exists inside our own heads. There is no part of the brain that can be opened to view the mind, you have to ask a person about their own mind. There is no natural way to explain how we can be so conscious, and even to explain how animals aren’t as conscious as us. There is much left unexplained by the naturalistic argument.
anything, rather they just are able to make a decision because there is one to be made. The difference lies in the intention of life when humans and animals were created as animals were not created to follow God. What is hard to distinguish from a naturalistic standpoint is the difference between the mind and the brain because the mind is not a physical thing. It is abstract, and it only exists inside our own heads. There is no part of the brain that can be opened to view the mind, you have to ask a person about their own mind. There is no natural way to explain how we can be so conscious, and even to explain how animals aren’t as conscious as us. There is much left unexplained by the naturalistic argument.