“Annihilation of Caste” is arguably B.R. Ambedkar’s most revolutionary text. It is not an argument directed at Hindu fundamentalists or extremists, but at those who considered themselves moderate, the ones toeing the line of diplomacy, those whom Ambedkar has refered to as “the best of Hindus” and also known to us simply as left-wing Hindus. In India,he had to be not only an accomplished legal and political mind, but also an untouchable. His pivotal role in politics came later as Nehru’s law minister. It was his work on the Constitution and his awe inspiring speeches about it which preserved the Constituent Assembly proceedings.
Annihilation of Caste outdates all this; it belongs to a train of Ambedkar’s thought that is not really political, but more social and religious. In 1936, the Jat-Pat Todak Mandal
, a group of Hindu reformers, invited Ambedkar to deliver the comprehensive lecture at its annual meet. He showed them the script of his lecture ahead of the actual delivery, and they, finding it objectionable, canceled the meeting. They were dedicated to moderate incremental reform as in they aimed for mixed-caste dining, and entertained the notion that social mingling would lead to intermarriage. But denunciation of …show more content…
The discriminations that dalits face are traumatizing to say in the least and the injustice of a whole people suffering under such treatment is hore horrifying when sanction is found in holy texts. The very faith of the people being their instrument of torture is worse than any dictatorship or despotism. Secondly, entailing the enforcement of the caste hierarchy, the upper castes, through the ages have deprived their so called “inferiors” of the two important tools for changing their lot: The right to education, which seriously hampered the chances of an untouchable to gain for himself knowledge for important posts and more fundamentally respect in the higher echelons and the right to bear arms. Without the potential use of arms, not solely for revolutionary purposes but also for self-defense in the case of violent oppression, any group would be reduced to a vegetable heard of stepping stones for the priviledged and the “high born”. The latter of the two problems could not be solved by simply renouncing the stigma associated to untouchability and reforming our conceptions of