Preview

AntiTrust Laws

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
889 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
AntiTrust Laws
The United States has a free market. This is very beneficial to consumers because it enables them to have a variety of products to choose from and it allows them to buy them at competitive prices. If it were not for the antitrust laws that the government put into effect there would not be much of a market. There would only be big businesses that produced everything and they would set the price consumers would pay. Antitrust laws protect companies from one another so they compete for business and are not forced out of business by a larger company. It is because of these antitrust laws, such as the Sherman Act (1890), the Clayton Act (1914), and the Federal Trade Commission Act (1914), that Americans today are able to have a free market and businesses are able to compete.
“Open markets, it is believed, provide fertile ground for a healthy economy by encouraging mew investment, job creation, stable prices, and a reliable marketplace” (Monopolies and antitrust, 1999). Antitrust laws are able to regulate the businesses so that no company can be the sole producer of a product. The term antitrust comes from the nineteenth century when “the trusts single-handedly controlled the nation’s most important markets, crushing all competitors, dictating prices, and erratically supplying goods and services to consumers” (Monopolies and antitrust, 1999). In a time when the nation was moving from agriculture to industry base, the lack of legal rules paved the way for the trusts such as Standard Oil and J.P. Morgan. They fixed their prices to eliminate their competitors, and then when they were out of business, the big businesses would increase their prices back up. “Many Americans began denouncing the trusts as the enemy of civil society and free enterprise, the press described Stand Oil as a menacing octopus with tentacles stretching across the country, and political unrest exacerbated the need for government intervention” (Kleiner, 2011). “Consumers were powerless, as were

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    A monopoly occurs when a company has such a large portion of the product market that it can set its own price despite the market equilibrium. Monopolies date back to Standard Oil Co. Inc. in 1870. Standard Oil Co. Inc. controlled also the entire oil market in its time and made huge profits by doing so. The Sherman Antitrust Act was put in place to combat monopolies and their power in the marketplace.…

    • 73 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clayton Antitrust Act

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The laws regarding regulation of cartels, trusts and monopoly in the market and overall regulation of the market in the USA were laid down in the USA, just as the US Constitution too was shaping up. The genesis of all this was in the Sherman Antitrust act in the year 1890. That act strove to control the market environment by putting a tight leash on trusts, organizations and companies which went against that act. To complement and strengthen this Sherman act, which later on turned out to be the basis of anti trust litigation by Federal government, another Act was passed sometime later, in the year 1914. This was the Clayton Antitrust act, passed by the Congress of the United States, drafted by Henry Clayton which explains the…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the late nineteenth century, the United States of America saw companies flourish. Advances in technology greatly increased output and lowered costs of many goods; people were also making more money and the nation was truly prospering. Due to the booming economy, a great deal of changes occurred. Companies started to grow at a faster rate, and soon there were enormous companies that seemed to rule their individual industries. It quickly became apparent that some firms were monopolizing the industries, making prices higher and lessening the competitiveness of the market. Many companies were also fixing prices, forcing other businesses to pay ridiculous amounts since they had no other options.…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Egt1 Task 3

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Government imposed antitrust acts/industrial regulations are to protect consumers of an industry’s actions pertaining to price and quantity preventing a monopoly to that end benefiting society.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government should break up Standard Oil’s monopoly. In 1870, John D. Rockefeller started his Oil corporation in Ohio. They had about 10,000 shares. Him and, William Rockefeller, who was his brother, Henry Flagler, chemist Samuel Andrews, silent partner Stephen V. Harkness, and Oliver Burr Jennings all partnered up to make this company become one of the first and biggests around. Then about 37 stockholders decided to put their shares into trust with an organization called the trustees. This system became so successful that other enterprises used this technique also. Eventually John’s company was spreading so fast as he was getting richer, he saw no need for other oil companies, so he bought out almost all his rivals. With no other companies…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    History Dbq 2012

    • 1940 Words
    • 8 Pages

    While the initial stages of big business trace back to pre-Civil War America, it was not until the post-Civil War time period that large corporations effected on American society. From Rockefeller to Vanderbilt to Carnegie and all in between, these men and their businesses had unprecedented influence on American life. John Rockefeller created the Standard Oil Trust, with the intention of his business, Standard Oil Company, becoming the oil monopoly; short after, The Homestead Strike against Carnegie Steel aroused massive public support for unions. Likewise, big businesses’ growth and influences brought about a decline in the cost of living and the birth of a new political party. As a whole, the rise of big business in post-Civil War America caused a downward economic spiral while simultaneously increasing American hostility toward government and corporations, ultimately leading to the birth of new political and philosophical movements.…

    • 1940 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Large corporations began to form monopolies in the 1800s. Competition helps the economy, by allowing the control of products and prices. However, in a monopoly there is only one seller of the product. Monopolies may cause prices to increase greatly, but only the corporation benefits. In order to seize control of large corporations was to form a trust. The federal government passes a series of antitrust laws in order to have a successful economy.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are 4 main pieces of legislation that are collectively known as the Anti-trust laws. They are the Sherman Antitrust Act, The Federal Trade commission Act, The Clayton Antitrust Act and the Celler-Kefauver Act. The Sherman Antitrust Act is legislation enacted to protect Americans against monopolies. It makes it illegal to make contracts or conspire to restrict trade or commerce. It also outlaws monopolies. The Federal Trade Commission Act established the Federal Trade Commission and set up how it would be run, with a group of 5 people that did not follow party lines that would be chosen for 7 years terms and would make sure no antitrust laws were being broken. The Clayton Antitrust Law closed a lot of the loopholes that the…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DiLorenzo believed the Sherman Antitrust act was “ Protectionist at its roots” (pg141). The government was using this so that incompetent businesses would be protected. According to Dilorenzo there was no proof that monopolies were hurting the country. In fact , there was a deflation during the late 19th century , prices were decreasing which would benefit consumers . The Sherman Act support came from less competitive firms that wanted to break up their more successful rivals. An example Dilorenzo gave was cotton farms. They were upset that jute was being used to cover cotton bales instead of cotton. They petition government to restrain jute farmers. Small firms had more power than the big ones, because if big firms had as much power as Yellow…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Progressives had beliefs such as industrialization and urbanization had created troubling social and political problems. Progressives wanted to bring about reforms that would correct what they saw as problems and injustices. The Antitrust Laws were designed to prevent and punish anti-competitive practices. Progressives complained that the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 was inadequate and ineffective in limiting the abuses of big businesses. The Progressives made states pass the antitrust laws to make cartels and monopolistic practices illegal and to regulate railroad rates.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I believe that the banks are not acting in a responsible fashion with their solicitation of consumers for credit cards and credit card lines. As mentioned in the article, the banks are advertising "promotions of credit card and debt to increase limits" in an attempt to gather additional consumers. I think by advertising these credit cards to college and high school students, and then providing them with higher credit limits and promotions, the banks are aiming to increase the number of irresponsible spenders in today's society to make money.…

    • 3370 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John D. Rockefeller created an oil empire, the Standard Oil Company, in this manner. Rockefeller monopolized the oil market through horizontal consolidation, buying out competitors, or driving competitors out of business by initiating rate wars. His cold-hearted mentality was highlighted when he claimed, “Individualism has gone, never to return.” In his testimony to the United States Industrial Commission, Rockefeller boasted about the “power to give the public improved products at less prices and still make a profit for stockholders”, but failed to recognize that consolidation left the poorer class suddenly unemployed. Many magnates also followed Andrew Carnegie’s entrepreneurial tactic of vertical consolidation, in which every stage of manufacturing a product was in the hands of a single corporation. According to James B. Weaver, such schemes allowed trusts to “control the articles which the plain people consume in their daily life.” The American people were forced to cope with the sugar trust, the leather trust, the harvester trust, the tobacco trust, and Rockefeller’s dominant Standard Oil trust. Along with the development of trusts, the invention of machinery allowed rich industrialists to hire less workers for lower wages. By cutting employees and saving money, the corrupt barons were…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Federal Trade Commission states that competition in the marketplace is good for both consumers and business. In fact this type of competition via free enterprise and open markets is the basis of our U.S. economy. When firms compete with each other, consumers get the best possible prices, quantity, and quality of goods and services.2 It is a dire necessity of any solid market.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First Assisgnment

    • 268 Words
    • 1 Page

    The biggest advantage of free market economy is that it gives the people the power of choice. They have more choices on how to spend their money. There is also no tax on the items and there is no regulation. But the disadvantages are that in can fail to provide certain goods and service. Another disadvantage is that the government doesn’t get any money so prices are raised in some stores.…

    • 268 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The US mostly has a free market but it is sometimes a mixed economy. Compared to other countries it’s more towards a free market and less towards a mixed economy. The free market economy is where goods and services can be traded freely by an agreement between vendors and consumers and the government or any other authority does not have any other intervention to impact either the demand or supply situation in that economy. The decisions in a free economy are influenced by competition, supply & demand. People can pretty much do whatever they want and be a free person, they can do any job, invent/create whatever they want etc. A market economy is driven mostly by what consumers want, this means that it’s not driven by what they need. On the whole,…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays