Preview

antitrust practices

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
614 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
antitrust practices
Antitrust practices
Introduction
Antitrust practices are practices carried on by businesses that end up destroying perfect competition in the market. Antitrust laws are laws prepared to seek and promote healthy market competition by preventing anti-competitive practices by companies. Some of the illegal practices that constitute to antitrust behavior include corporate mergers, monopolies and price fixing conspiracies (Bailey, 2010). The Clayton Act of 1914 was passed by the U.S Congress. It was an antitrust law that was amended to stop and prevent practices that led to unhealthy competition in the market. The Clayton Act was amended in order to complement an earlier version of the antitrust law referred to as the Sherman antitrust Act of 1980. This was a federal law that sought to prevent practices that were harmful to consumers such as cartels, monopolies and other unfair business practices (California Association of REALTORS, 2005).
Google Company
One of the recent firms to be investigated for antitrust behavior is Google Company that leads the online searching industry. According to Weiss (2014), the firm recently was being investigated by Competition Commission of India (CCI) for claims that it abused its dominance in the online search engine industry by mainly promoting its own services over those of its rivals. This reason is considered to create unhealthy competition in the business as the search engine company dominates its rivals in what is considered almost a monopolistic market.
Antitrust behavior brings about both pecuniary and non-pecuniary costs. Since it damages healthy competition in the market, monopolies can result and this has adverse effects to the prices of commodities. The products end up becoming costly and expensive for the customers and, therefore, affecting the society negatively (Bailey, 2010). On the other hand, antitrust behavior leads to the output of products falling below the market competitive level and this is mainly

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    A monopoly occurs when a company has such a large portion of the product market that it can set its own price despite the market equilibrium. Monopolies date back to Standard Oil Co. Inc. in 1870. Standard Oil Co. Inc. controlled also the entire oil market in its time and made huge profits by doing so. The Sherman Antitrust Act was put in place to combat monopolies and their power in the marketplace.…

    • 73 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clayton Antitrust Act

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This Act was mainly a modification and expansion of the already existent federal antitrust law, as a result of the Sherman Act. Clayton Act prescribed changes which were substantive and complementary to the Sherman Antitrust Act. The entire focus of the Clayton Antitrust act was to capture and nip the anti competitive market practices in the bud. This meant that some types of market conducts were to be prohibited. There are primarily 4 sections of this act which suggested major changes in the Sherman act. The following aspects were laid down by the Clayton Act. These are -…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Clayton antitrust act was passed in 1914. The act was drafted by Alabama Democrat Henry De Lamar Clayton. President Wilson instructed congress to come up with the act when he went into office in 1912. Wilson felt as though large companies had too many freedoms. The Act was put into effect to prohibit anticompetitive price discrimination, prohibit against certain tying and exclusive deal practices, expand power to private parties to sue and obtain triple damages, labor exemption that permitted union organizing, prohibition against ant compatible mergers. Company mergers have to go through the Federal Trade Commission and The Department of Justice for regulation to be approached. It is not uncommon for a merger to be disapproved. Like…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to stop the establishment of monopolies, the Sherman Antitrust law was passed in 1890 by Congress. The Supreme Court made the decision that contracts would be illegal if they formed an “unreasonable restraint of trade.” The Sherman Antitrust law “ provides that no person shall monopolize, attempt to monopolize or conspire with another to monopolize interstate or foreign trade or commerce,…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    apple antitrust

    • 113340 Words
    • 454 Pages

    Given your research and findings, are monopolies and oligopolies (firms demonstrating power) always bad for society? Be sure to provide real world examples of where this may be the case to strengthen your position.…

    • 113340 Words
    • 454 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Yet for over 100 years, the antitrust laws have had the same basic objective: to protect the process of competition for the benefit of consumers, making sure there are strong incentives for businesses to operate efficiently, keep prices down, and keep quality up.” ("The Antitrust Laws | Federal Trade Commission", 2014)…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Competition law, known in the United States as antitrust law, is law that promotes or maintains market competition by regulating anti-competitive conduct by companies.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    AntiTrust Laws

    • 889 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The United States has a free market. This is very beneficial to consumers because it enables them to have a variety of products to choose from and it allows them to buy them at competitive prices. If it were not for the antitrust laws that the government put into effect there would not be much of a market. There would only be big businesses that produced everything and they would set the price consumers would pay. Antitrust laws protect companies from one another so they compete for business and are not forced out of business by a larger company. It is because of these antitrust laws, such as the Sherman Act (1890), the Clayton Act (1914), and the Federal Trade Commission Act (1914), that Americans today are able to have a free market and businesses are able to compete.…

    • 889 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Antitrust Policy Essay

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Antitrust policies and regulations placed by the government of the United States are geared for the competitive process. Several rulings on major companies have been made in order to have a set of guidelines of when a government intervention is needed. Government intervention acts like a regulator with goal of improving economic welfare, well at least in theory. By implementing antitrust policies governments decrease market powers of monopolies. For example, antitrust policies are a way to control inefficiency that a monopoly is creating in a market, by forcing competition. In contrast, to restricting company's ability to monopolize a market, the government can imposed copyrights…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The goals of antitrust laws are to make corporations compete fairly and are intended to prevent monopolies and encourage competition. A company that has market power can change prices to benefit their company. Other companies will follow their example. In the antitrust investigation against Apple, Inc., Apple’s collusion with publishers increased its market power considerably, essentially high jacking the e-book market. With the ever-evolving technological advances, judges in antitrust cases must incorporate the longstanding antitrust laws to fit with today’s practices.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Antitrust Investigation

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A European Commission Antitrust probe into Google might result in the search giant having to make changes to its Android platform. According to certain sources, Google had abused its dominant position in online search. The costs associated with the antitrust behavior are surprisingly minimal. In fact, there was no mention of any mention of the costs that are associated with this antitrust behavior. Likewise, there was also no mention of a name for the type of antitrust act that was done here. After the full-scale investigation was brought up, Google was commanded to change the way it displays its search results and alter the agreements it has with its advertisers. Monopolies and oligopolies are not always bad for society. It really depends on how these different firms conduct their business. If they are going to intentionally produce only a few products and not let any other firm sell it, then yes, they would be bad for society. If it is the other way around, then it is a whole different story. An auto industry would be an example of a oligopoly. They mainly produce automobiles and sell them out to their distributors. These distributors however will be the only ones to sell them commercially. No other firm out there can sell them directly from the manufacturer. This would be an example of how these market types would be bad for society. On the other hand, an example of how these market types might be good for society would be the fact that if society purchases these automobiles from those distributors, they will be getting a better product than if they were sold locally. One other example of how these market types would be good for society would be the petroleum industry. If petroleum was sold individually and not by these market types, no one would know where the petroleum came from or what quality it is in.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Competition and Consumer Act targets practices that are deemed as undesirable and unethical in the eyes of the consumer. These include deceptive and misleading advertising, price discrimination, consumer guarantees, warrantees and refunds.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although some economists and businessmen believe that the economy should be allowed to move freely based on the laws of supply and demand without government intervention, government involvement is necessary to ensure a competitive market and help prevent market failure. Ever since the Clayton Anti-trust Act was passed in 1890, government has regulated and broken apart monopolistic businesses. Since businesses are constantly moving towards a monopoly or oligopoly, government regulators must be increasingly vigilant in regulating monopolistic businesses to prevent a non-competitive market. If the government did not regulate businesses to prevent monopolies, then those corporations would become too politically powerful, decrease total output, and increase their prices. An example of the harmful effects a monopoly can have on politics is when a monopolistic company threatens to raise the price of a good or service that is important to the government in order to bring about a desirable result. Another reason government must stop monopolistic companies is because they artificially raise their…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Market Competition

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages

    These regulations exist to ensure that natural monopolies are not charging consumers monopoly prices which in turn hurt the consumers as well as society as a whole. Industrial regulations affect the market by its regulation of the natural monopolies which in turn protects the markets consumers. These regulations also allow for a fair profit to the natural monopoly by setting a fair rate, protecting its consumers, but also a “fair return to the enterprises”. (McConnell & Brue, 2008, p. 382)…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    the competition act 2010

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Competition forces enterprises to be more efficient, innovative and responsive to consumer demand. The benefits of competition are lower prices, better products, wider choice for consumers, and greater efficiency of enterprises and the economy as a whole. Anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominance can distort competition in the marketplace. The enterprises that affected have to cease operation as they will be priced out or otherwise driven out of the market.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays