You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Antony understood the audience very well and knew they would consider any other viewpoint on any topic. He realized that using his emotions would be the most beneficial way to persuade. He was able to use ethos by stating how Caesar was not too ambitious to have his life taken away from him (III,ii,94-99). Antony used pathos by having a visual, emotional impact on the people. He lifted up his cloak, showing the wounds, and telling where each conspirator had the power and the evil motivation to kill this worthy man…
- 538 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Now, Shakespeare was a famous playwright of the time and it seemed logical for him to express his ideologies through his popular plays to comment on his society. Shakespeare was able to use scenes such as the Brutus vs. Antony orations to stress the conflicting ideals between truth and propaganda, as well as their effects on society. Shakespeare captures Brutus’s honesty when he states “I honour him; but as he was ambitious, I slew him” through his use of prose within the speech. Prose reveals to the audience of plebeians Brutus’ rational and logical thinking behind assassinating Caesar, to which he emphasised “not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more.” The way in which Brutus excuses his actions appears to be beneficiary to the population instead for his selfish purposes, as well as depicting Caesar as a negative influence to the Roman Empire. This is soon contradicted by Antony’s oration which was written in blank verse. The speech mocks as well as contrasts Brutus’ intentions implicitly though the repetition of “But Brutus is an honourable man” which follows conflicting contradictory statements. This depicts Antony’s oration skills as both more superior and authentic to Brutus’s speech as it exposes the contrast between higher and lower order rhetoric. Brutus’s and Antony’s orations, create a powerful…
- 1383 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Initially the power ethos was used by Brutus to affect the crowds’ ethical standpoint on Julius Caesar. Brutus knew the Plebeians treasured Caesar and he knew that they gave Brutus a similar level of admiration. Brutus used his veneration to make the crowd believe the conspirators were doing the appropriate thing in killing Caesar. Brutus expected the crowd to believe whatever he said because of the respect they have…
- 419 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Julius Caesar’s Mark Antony prevails as the master of persuasion through language. In a eulogy speech for the recently deceased Caesar, he expertly employs repetition, reverse psychology, and flattery to manipulate the minds and hearts of his audience.…
- 613 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In society, we often look to those in authority for guidance or clarification in times of darkness and distress. In these situations, we look to the most righteous and trustworthy of them all to be our candles in the darkness. Julius Caesar was murdered because a collection of conspirators assumed that he may in the future abuse his power. The conspirators were Cassius, Metellus, Ligarius, Cinna, Casca, Trebonius, and Brutus, Caesar's close friend. People who are used to being public speakers, such as public leaders are able to sway their audience in any direction they want with the assistance of logos, pathos, ethos. Antony and Brutus were equally honorable and well-respected, but after comparing the two funeral speeches , there’s no debate that Antony had the most effective speech because his excellent range of logos, ethos, and pathos.…
- 1557 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Antony says some keywords, to make the crowd to believe that he loved him as much as they did. “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me.” Antony also repeats words to indicate to the crowd that he is sarcastic. “For Brutus says he is ambitious, and Brutus is an honourable man.” Antony uses specific words to turn the crowd onto his side.…
- 565 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Antony uses ethos to show how well he knows Caesar and how Brutus should not be trusted. At the beginning of his speech, Antony gives his credentials by saying how Caesar “was [his] friend, faithful and just to [him]” (III, ii, 87). This quote from Antony’s speech demonstrates the persuasive tool of Ethos because he is saying how he knows Caesar personally and is a very good friend of his. This…
- 686 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Brutus and Antony both use Ethos to give credibility to their speeches. In his speech Brutus says, “Believe me for mine honour, and have respect to mine honour that you may believe,”(III.ii.14-16). Brutus is implying that since he is an honorable man with a great reputation, you should believe him. Basically Brutus is saying that his honor makes his speech true. Antony on the other hand says in his speech, “Good friends, sweet friends,”(III.ii.214). By addressing the people as…
- 572 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Antony loved Caesar and was completely against his murder, so he used rhetorical strategies to persuade the Romans to be against the perpetrators. For example when Antony says “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” he is using the mix of sarcasm and logos. Antony repeats this same thing over and over again until the Romans start questioning if Brutus truly is an honorable man. His sarcasm and repetition were both great rhetorical tactics that were used to manipulate and confuse the Roman’s minds. Antony brings together the perfect amount of ethos and pathos when he states, “ ‘Tis his will. Let but the commons hear this testament- which pardon me, I do not mean to read- And they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds And dip their napkins in his sacred blood,” (III,ii,127-132). This is essential because it shows that Antony is credible and trustworthy because he has Caesar’s will. This also appeals to the people’s emotions because they become saddened over Caesar’s death. Antony used his tactics to make the Romans trust him and his views, which led to them rioting against the perpetrators. His use of ethos, pathos, and logos convinced the people that the assassination of Caesar was a cruel act and that Brutus, Cassius, and the other perpetrators are…
- 940 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Ethos is a form of establishing your credibility to other. Brutus’s use of Ethos far surpasses Antony’s because of how he reminds the crowd how honorable he is and how much more honor he has than Antony. Brutus states, “believe me for mine honour, and have respect to mine honour, that you may believe” (3.2.2-4). This is proves that Brutus compared to Antony has better ethos while Antony’s ethos is “I thrice presented him a kingly crown, Which he thrice refuse; was this ambition” (3.2.24-25). This is stating that Caesar thrice denies the crown but the reason he had done this was to seem less ambitious no matter how ambitious he was which he was very ambitious to be the king of rome. This example of ethos is inferior to Brutus’s because the way Antony uses his form of ethos is to show that Caesar did not deserve this connecting to Caesar more than the people of rome. While Brutus’s statements have personal connections to the crowd way more than Antony’s because of how his example is something that could happen to the them more than just one person. Ethos is a major key on connecting with this crowd by establishing credibility and how Brutus demonstrates his connections show better ethos than…
- 583 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Ethos are well used by both Brutus and Antony, they use these so that they can get people to think and get an image in their head of how good people they are. Brutus shows Ethos by saying, "Believe me for mine honor, and have respect to mine honor that you may believe." (III:ii:14-15). When he says this he is saying that he has honor and the people should believe him and they should have great respect for someone with such honor as him. When Antony talks he shows it as a different point. Antony says, "He was my friends, faithful just…
- 575 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the play of “Julius Caesar”, after Brutus speech about killing Caesar is for the good of Rome, Mark Antony began his speech, despite to all of the people who disagreed to his speech or the truth, he still wanted to revenge to those who murdered his beloved friend Caesar. Instead of using ethos or logos, Antony uses pathos to gain the crowd flavor and it’s extremely effective. Antony manages the people of Rome to almost cry for Caesar death and wanted to revenge for Caesar.…
- 523 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Mark Antony used the three persuasion tools to turn the roman crowd against Brutus. The most convincing use of ethos in Antony’s speech is in the first line of the speech; “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears!” This shows that Mark Antony is trying to get in to the Roman crowd’s hearts. He uses rhetorical irony throughout the speech constantly questioning the ethos of Brutus. “When that the poor cried, Caesar hath wept; ambition should be made of sterner stuff: yet Brutus is an honorable man.” Mark Antony repeats the phrase “yet Brutus is an honorable man” then he says logical statement that proofs Caesar did nothing wrong. Which led the crowd to turn on Brutus, without Antony actually saying that what Brutus did was wrong. Mark Antony uses a lot of facts throughout the course of his speech. One of the key facts in his initial speech is; “When that the poor…
- 363 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Literature naturally comes to mind as a rich resource for the study of persuasion. To persuade someone completely, one must use rhetorical devices to overcome one of the three key decision making factors: Logos, Pathos, and Ethos. One major concern of Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar is about rhetoric, the skill of persuading people with words. Appeals to logos, pathos and ethos are effectively made to reveal the characters as seen in Cassius, Brutus and Mark Antony respectively throughout the play.…
- 368 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Brutus and Antony both use different rhetorical techniques to persuade the crowd at Julius Caesar's funeral. However, the arguments can be very different and one speech can be more persuasive than the other. Brutus's and Antony's speech have a different base on the same topic and both have a valid point in each. Brutus lectures about how Caesar is a courageous person. Antony, however, discourses about how Caesar is determined and how Brutus transferred captives home to Rome. Antony also speaks about how Caesar was a faithful man to Rome and to what degree he paid for his fault. Brutus talks about Caesar's honor and if Caesar was dead, then Rome would be complimentary.…
- 508 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays