INTRO
Theis Statement
Today, humans have come up with innovative ways of addressing many problems. One of the most recent and controversial inventions is the engineering of food. Nina Fedoroff (2011) presents the debate on genetic modification of food, where she specifically supports the innovation, holding the position that it plays a critical role in addressing food security in the world (“Engineering Food for All,” 2011). Genetic engineering of food elicits mixed reactions from those on either side of the debate. A close examination of genetic engineering of food reveals the fact that this dangerous technology poses serious risks to the environment, human health and the overarching economy.
Topic Sentence 1
BODY PARA 1
Engineering of food, first and foremost, can cause harm to the environment. Pollen grains from genetically modified maize kill the larvae of the monarch butterfly (Tomson, Dickson & Harrison, 2003, p. 24). The indiscriminate killing of insects underlines the environmental unfriendliness of genetic engineering of food crops. Similarly, the use of herbicides results in the indiscriminate killing of plants. Therefore, this technology clearly undermines biodiversity (Pseudnymison, 2006, p.72). In adopting this technology we would have to be prepared for enormous technological challenges. Crops designed to resist pesticides would soon see their effectiveness decrease. An appropriate comparison would be mosquito resistance to DDT. In addition, weeds exposed to herbicides would soon become resistant. This would create unnecessary complications that would require repeated modification of the crops (Tomson, Dickson & Harrison, 2003, p.34).
Topic Sentence 2
BODY PARA 2
Genetically modified foods also bring serious adverse effects to human health. Mostly,