Preview

Argumentative Essay About Constitution

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
389 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argumentative Essay About Constitution
February 22, 1788
12345 McCord Rd
Huntersville NC, 28078
Editor
The New Bern Gazette
53425 Legal St
New Bern, NC, 28078

To the Editor: I am not in the favor of adopting the Constitution. I believe that a constitution should meet every one of its states or providences interests. Our constriction is clearly biased in its ideas and terms. It is unfair and shouldn’t be the foundation for our new country. Some statements are too broad and will cause arguments within the country to try to define what they mean. This could cause mass turmoil in the country and may disrupt foreign affairs. That would be unfair to America and its citizens. Another reason is that the smaller states have less representation in the House of Representatives, which is based on population. This could cause the smaller sates to disconnect form the United States and take valuable resources that keep America’s economy running. Also civil wars may break out from the unfair control of power. My last reason is that government officials could become corrupt with power. With a small agreement between a dictator like president and some loyal congressmen we could plunge into a never ending debt and warfare that we wouldn’t be able to recover from. This would leave our country vulnerable to attack and infiltration. It would also liberate our freedom and rights that make America unique. I understand reasons for adopting the constitution. It provides better communication between the national and state governments; this would allow the countries wealth to prosper. However, this could lead to the nation favoring larger states as they have more representation in the House of Representatives. This again would prove unfair for the smaller states like New Jersey due to the fact that a state like Virginia could receive more supplies as they are bigger and more powerful in the House of Representatives.
In conclusion, I believe that adopting the Constitution is not the right choice. Based on facts

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Creating the new Constitution would bind the states into one alliance and allow the country to run smoothly. Hamilton thoughtfully accepts the notion of the government allowing the states running themselves is not foolish. However, the states would be “depending for its execution on the good faith of the parties”(8), and only take laws created by the national government as “mere recommendations” and “disregard at their option” (8). The states selfishness about their own well being and not considering that of the nation is a clear factor that the power of executing in a correct manner as a union is important for the future of the country in order for us not to fall under an anarchy. Furthermore, the flaws of the Articles of Confederation increased overtime causing there to be numerous issues.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was a definite divide between supporters and opponents. The opponents did not reject the Articles. Many opponents feared that the Constitution is undemocratic and that it could be very oppressive overall. There were controversies about the Constitution and how it failed to address…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation were well written, especially considering the fact that the U.S.A. was a brand-new country and had no knowledge whatsoever on how to run a country. Though they were good, the articles didn't provide America with a very effective government. Since the people were afraid of a centralized government that would become too powerful, they decided to move most issues to a state level, rather than a national one. This is problematic because of it's economic effects, and because of the effects on politics and the limitations of the federal governments.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do you think it was a good idea to ratify the constitution? At the time it was a big debate deciding whether or not we should ratify the constitution because anti-federalists wouldn’t agree with it unless they got a bill of rights, the first ten amendments, to state what all their rights. Eventually, the federalists who supported the constitution gave them a Bill of Rights. I believe the Constitution was a good decision to ratify because it gave power to the people, made 3 houses so not one person got too much power, and it made improvements from the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People didnt want a Constitution and believed that things were just fine the way they were and everything should be left alone. In Document 2 we see that Mercy Otis Warren was an opponent. He had fear that the Constitution would threaten the rights of conscience and liberty of press. Patrick Henry was also against ratifying the Constitution. In Document 4, he says that a Constitution would endanger the rights and privileges that the people had and they would lose sovereignty, the freedom from an external control. In Document 5, Amos Singletree also opposed the ratification of the Constitution. But he doesn’t only fear the possible threat of people’s rights, he, being poor, was afraid that only rich learned men would be able to have power, and will have total rule over the poor…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    My Woll Readings

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The topic of Federalism was debated upon widely during the creation of the Constitution. For example, Federalism was negatively viewed at first because states felt that the federalism would undermine their power and cause a strong central government which would continue the tyranny that the people despised, something which caused them to break away from England in the first place. The passage also brings up desegregation laws that greatly decreased the power of the states since it required the states to conform to the will of the government. This of course angered the states and caused many to wonder how far the power of the government should extend. The passage also talks about the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, which included the inability to raise an Army, no efficient way of raising funding for the government to function, and an overall lack of power. The government had to rely on the states for any control they could exercise and the states often would not help the government. Alexander Hamilton later speaks about the pros to the federal constitution…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Document 1 the author says, “Let us look and [see] the [problems that exist] in every part of our country . . . the complaints of our farmers . . . the complaints of every class of [people who loan money] . . . the [sad] faces of our working people . . . our ships rotting in our harbors . . . the insults that are [made against America] in every court in Europe”. The author who was a supporter of the Constitution being ratified talks about how many problems that the United States has under the current Constitution and he feels that the only way the problems can be solved is too ratify the Constitution. George Washington feels that people thought that they knew too much about how a confederation works when the first…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the heels of the revolutionary war and the failed attempt of a national government (The Articles of Confederation), the leaders of the United States set to make a stronger, centralized government, with dual sovereignty between the national government and the states. The rules of this governing body would be laid out in a document called the Constitution. Although most leaders supported the constitution they did not agree on many aspects of it. Out of the disagreement two groups emerged, the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist. The Federalist supported all aspects of the constitution and a larger national government, while the Anti-Federalist opposed ratifying the constitution and supported a smaller national government and more sovereignty to the states. This disagreement led to a fierce debate between the two groups that still resonates today. This essay will examine the primary…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In fear of tyranny and corruption, two arguments against the ratification of the Constitution were that if they increased the power of the central government they would be too far away to help the citizens with their concerns, instead they favored the rights of the states and the active representation of the average citizens. They also argued to keep the unicameral legislature, they believed that local and state governments represented voters more fairly. They also argued that the newly ratified Constitution didn’t guarantee protection for some basic liberties.They also believed that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal court, they said that the federal courts wouldn’t be able to provide justice to the average citizen like state…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution is a plan for government and was written in 1787. Our society is constantly changing, so our constitution needs to also. The role of government is to protect us and they can’t do that with a constitution that isn’t fit for our daily life. The constitution doesn’t support a strong central government. There are corrupt officials, growing population, and it is outdated.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti Federalism Dbq

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It may not sound very American to say, but the constitution has it’s flaws. The checks and balances of the federal government are only as strong as the integrity of the officials in the three branches. A group with similar ideas can take over all three and make deals amongst themselves. The state governments need more power to keep a check on the National government.Another issue with a strong centra government is that people in different states have vastly different beleifs and ideologies, and many of them even if held by an entire state, may not make it to the federal government. Richard Henry Lee said “In this congressional legislature, a bare majority of votes can enact commercial laws; so that the representatives of the seven Northern States, as they will have a majority, can, by law, create the most oppressive monopoly upon the five Southern States, whose circumstances and productions are essentially different from those of theirs, although not a single man of these voters are the representatives of, or amenable to, the people of the Southern States.“ And that was just with differences in opinion between the limited number of states that existed them. Now, with 50 states and an ever rising population, there are more differences than ever. A stronger state government would result in more diversity between states, laws more fitting to the beliefs of individual states opinion. Then the small federal government would make sure that these…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1776 the United States declared its independence from the tyrannical British Empire and has been growing as a nation ever since then. The first constitution that the United States developed as a united country was the Articles of Confederation, which failed horribly. But learning from the mistakes made in the Articles of Confederation the brilliant minds of early America drafted the Constitution, a document that still governs the states to this day with only being amended 27 times. In order to be this successful it was written very broadly with a lot of room for interpretation because every problem couldn’t be addressed. One problem that the Founding Fathers made sure to address was popular sovereignty, in fear of another tyrannical king. The Constitution ensured popular sovereignty with regulations on term limits, the bill of rights and the separation of powers.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution should be allowed to be changed but only on a vote; the President or the senate would not be allowed to make changes without the peoples vote. Along with that, it must only be changed to the needs of the country not its…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitutional Convention of 1787 was deemed a great success in many eyes. This constitution laid the foundation for the great nation called the United States of America. Looking back on America’s first plan of government, the Articles of Confederation, it is known that change was necessary in order to keep our nation moving forward and the Constitutional Convention was the first step to accomplishing success. The quarreling between the Federalists and Anti-Federalist over the ratification of the Constitution and demand for a better equipped government are all the more reasons why the Constitutional Convention was appropriate.…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American people have been known from the start for a strong Constitution created to protect the rights of their citizens. As culture evolved, our interpretation of the document has shifted with it, but the document itself and its fundamental concepts have not. The Constitution has protected the basic rights of all citizens, and has granted us certain privileges that allow us to uphold the democracy and the government that serves the people. Some of these include the right to vote and the ability of citizens to maintain their status.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays