Preview

The Constitutional Convention of 1787

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
270 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Constitutional Convention of 1787
The Constitutional Convention of 1787 was deemed a great success in many eyes. This constitution laid the foundation for the great nation called the United States of America. Looking back on America’s first plan of government, the Articles of Confederation, it is known that change was necessary in order to keep our nation moving forward and the Constitutional Convention was the first step to accomplishing success. The quarreling between the Federalists and Anti-Federalist over the ratification of the Constitution and demand for a better equipped government are all the more reasons why the Constitutional Convention was appropriate. The Virginia Plan, proposed by James Madison, called for states to be represented permitting to their population under a national legislature. James Madison’s plan was to drop the Articles of Confederation completely and start from scratch. According to the Virginia Plan the members of the House of Representatives would be elected by popular vote; however, senators would be chosen indirectly by state legislatures protecting them from democratic burden. Although the Virginia Plan has many enticing ideas an opposition occurs. The complication with the Virginia Plan is that not all states have the same population; therefore, smaller states could easily become overruled by larger states with a dense population. William Paterson, of New Jersey, debated this issue between the large and small states which is known as the New Jersey Plan. James Madison and William Paterson came to an agreement that agreed to both sides of their plans. This agreement became known as the Great Compromise which allowed all states to be represented equally in the Senate and in the House of Representatives.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I, Oliver Ellsworth representative of Connecticut, propose that the basis of representation in the legislative branch remain by state as under the Articles of Confederation. I support the system of government that maintains the principle of local rule and I understand central government as the body that will strengthen the rights of property and the harmony of the republic, therefore I claim “we” are partly national and partly federal. Under this I shall introduce the resolution with my ally Roger Sherman along with William S. Johnson, The Great Compromise, breaking the deadlock between the large and small states over representative, allowing United States senators to be elected by state legislature. I do agree with Randolph’s notion of a…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As you know, we are going through the Great Compromise. Congress cannot decide whether or not it is fair to adopt the New Jersey Plan, or the Virginia Plan. This compromise (An agreement with two sides or more, where every side gives up some of what they may want.) is one that potentially will shape the future government. You might be in between the two plans, but after you read this, you’ll know why you should choose the New Jersey Plan. This plan is about having an organized government, and the ideas on what the Congress should have the power to do.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book “A Brilliant Solution: Inventing the American Constitution” by Carol Berkin she explains the constitution from start to finish from how it all began, to the debates inside the convention and finally the end product. Berkin takes the reader and puts him directly in the middle of the convention of 1786; throughout the book you can feel the excitement, the frustration, the tensions between delegates and the overall commitment to making a new government work for all.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Describe the structure of government as proposed in the “Virginia Plan” and “New Jersey Plan” of the Constitutional Convention.…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Virginia Plan gave the strong national power that could make and enforce laws, and collect taxes. The people would be governed by two forms of government national and state. Both house of the legislature would have representative sitting from the states. This means that big states would occupy more people and more representative would sit and the plan was favored by the big states. Smaller states were scared about the plan because it would mean they would almost have no saying in the government with less representative. Smaller states were not in favor of the Virginia plan so they decided to draw up their own plan Known as The New Jersey Plan. This means that it would have equal represtation and each states gets the same number of representative in the house. The New Jersey plan was rejected for the new constitution, because…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did you know that the Constitutional Convention came together to reform the Articles of Confederation, but they ended up a whole new plan of government? One of the biggest issues was how representation was going to be set up in the Legislative Branch, so two plans were made, one of which is the Virginia Plan. Under the Virginia Plan, the Legislative Branch would be bicameral, or have two houses. Representation would be based on population in both houses, giving Congress and larger states more power. The other plan was called the New Jersey Plan, which is the plan smaller states favored.…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    14th Amendment Structure

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The issue still was how congress would allot for its representatives given the numbers of constituents in each of the states; originally they attempted one for every thirty thousand which if initially ratified would have fell short of the necessary three-fourths (Amar, Akhil Reed, 1992). Direct representation Madison would point out during the attempt to find a solution is impossible, even a tiny state like Rhode island would find it difficult to be at every assembly, he insisted on a smaller select group (Amar, Akhil Reed, 1992). The one in every thirty thousand would be later changed to one in every forty thousand and would be adjusted every ten years as the population grew (Amar, Akhil Reed, 1992). This mathematical formula made little sense as Mr. Amar states “if the population grew from eight to nine million in a decade the house would be 200 delegates” which would negate the condition that there not be more than one for every fifty thousand (Amar, Akhil Reed, 1992). This section changed in 1910 the basis of representation was one for every 210,000 inhabitants, and it wasn’t till the 1930’s by the act of June 1929 that the house was restricted to 435 members, now they just continue to divide the population to meet the electoral quota (Corwin et al., 1978). The senate allocations are extremely less problematic provided by section 3 of article one it simply states there will be two senators for each state, and even the addition in the 17th amendment does not change much but adds the basis if there are any vacancy (Corwin et al.,…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitution. Paterson delivered the New Jersey Plan with his concern of the voices of smaller states would be drawn out of larger states if the Virginia Plan been approved (Abraham Messler, 1954). His plan was particularly in response to the Virginia Plan, which in favor of proportional representation and a bicameral legislature( Leonard Williams Levy, 2000). The New Jersey Plan supported each state has one vote regardless of their population and the unicameral legislature. The with the final decision had come after their intense debate, that was the rejection of the New Jersey Plan, and the main reason was because it was too concentrated on gain more power to small states rather than the…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Framers Vs Constitution

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Constitutional Convention was a political assembly that occurred between May and September of 1787 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and determined how the United States of America was to be governed. Following the drastic failure of the Articles of Confederation, the Framers gathered, looking toward a new ideal: one with a stronger national government, which would unify the states as one sovereign country. Prompted by the outset of the majority of its proponents, the conference had unanimously concurred the creation of a constitution, which would direct the new government. However, the drafting process of the composition was greatly debated, as economic differences between the states created many conflicts.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitutional Convention was an important part of the United States’ history and played a big role in shaping our history and also our present. The Constitution is important because it is what our country follows to be organized, fair, and in order. People who favored the Constitution along with a strong national government were called federalists. The Federalists were afraid that the United States wouldn’t stay united without the Constitution, so that…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve years after declaring independence, the American people were struggling to articulate their vision for government. They were acutely aware of the shortcomings of a weak central government under the Articles of Confederation, yet they still felt strongly that the individual states maintain their power. James Madison drafted the Virginia Plan in 1787, with a goal of stabilizing the budding nation by according more authority to a central government than before. These resolutions would ultimately become a new Constitution. It was in January 1788, after five states had ratified but eight were still skeptical, that Madison penned a letter to the Independent Journal, wherein he detailed his rationale for the larger federal government.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The delegates at the Constitutional Convention made the right decision to sign the constitution as although imperfect, it was a solid start to creating a stronger federal government that would begin to correct America’s mistakes.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conclusion of the convention should bring me solace but I find that it only brings me distress for the future of our country. I do not believe that we established a wise and just government. I believe that this government is destined to either become a monarchy or fall into the hands of a corrupt and oppressive aristocracy. Granting the plan we decided upon is superior to The Articles. The Articles of Confederation was a government that should have never been thought up. There were too many weaknesses under the Articles of Confederation. Congress had an extremely difficult time passing laws due to the fact that 9 of the 13 states had to agree before any laws could be passed. Since there was no president or an executive branch, there was no way to make sure that laws passed by Congress were carried out. There were no courts to interpret laws or to judge those that broke them because a national court system did not exist. To make matters worse, changing the Articles of Confederation was nearly impossible. A unanimous vote of all 13 states was required before any changes could be made and having that happen was nigh impossible. Not only was there a problem with the laws but congress did not have the power to collect the taxes needed to pay for the expenses of the national government! Congress could ask for money, yet it had no power to force the states into paying them. Without money, Congress could not pay the nation's debt nor could it provide government programs and services. Another Problem under the Articles was that the national government could not control trade between the states or with foreign nations. Each state regulated its own trade, which resulted in many disputes among the states and with other nations as well. In addition, most states made their own money. Without a constant national currency, trading was a difficult process. The Articles made each state act like a small, separate nation. The people of each state saw themselves as citizens…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, yet there was a struggle for its ratification that went on until 1790. Members of Congress believed that the Articles of Confederation, the first government of the United States, needed to be altered while others did not want change. After the Revolutionary War, there was a need for strong state centered governments, rather than a strong central government based on their experience as a colony. However, an investigation of the historical record reveals that the Articles of Confederation were not meeting the needs of Americans, and the need for a new Constitution was desired. This desired Constitution created a huge dispute and argument between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    constitutional convention

    • 1277 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “It has often been said that, as conventional rules derive neither from legislation nor from decisions of the courts, they have an uncertain existence and are not ultimately backed up by any obligations”. (Bradley & Ewing).…

    • 1277 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays