Have you ever taken a standardized test? All students in the American public education system have or will take these tests. Standardized tests measure test taking abilities of students, not how smart they are and waste valuable class time. This can decrease the overall intelligence of the students because they are being prepared to take tests not to learn or better their education. Lastly, a lot of the data from tests can be skewed for many reasons like poor testing environments. The tests should be outlawed or made not mandatory or altered to the multiple measures proposal.
Standardized tests such as the IOWA or OGT take away from what students should be learning in class. At Champion High School a very significant amount of time in the class is spent on preparing for the end of the year tests. Also the testing itself takes weeks to complete. Teachers spend months …show more content…
It reads “Doctors diagnosing an illness use multiple assessments: the patient's medical history, lab tests, answers to questions about how the patient feels, and so on. The question is, Why do education policymakers and practitioners sometimes opt to make important decisions based on only one indicator?” (Brookhart) Nevertheless the one indicator that is used is inaccurate as demonstrated at the beginning of the paper.
Standardized tests are a poor and inaccurate way to demonstrate a student's ability and knowledge. The test results can be determined by to many things besides the intelligence of students like the testing environment. Any environment that does not allow students to be comfortable can skew test results. These tests waste valuable class time of students and teachers, they should be made not mandatory. Another option is the multiple measures proposal which can allow schools to find multiple pathways to help students succeed in the future. Overall, student success should not be determined by one