respectively. Surprisingly, although their titles seem at a glance to imply so, these articles do not contradict each other! In Giuliani’s article, he slams Lester Holt, showing him to be plainly wrong by presenting the fact that, in 1968, supreme court case Terry vs.
Bradshaw ruled 8-1 in favor of ‘stop and frisk’ being constitutional. Giuliani also advocates for the “careful and appropriate” use of ‘stop and frisk’ in preventing crime and lowering crime rates. De Blasio states in his article that Trump is wrong about what quantity is enough, and the overall effectiveness of this practice. He believes that ‘stop and frisk’ can be divisive in communities if used excessively, and is not as effective as other crime-fighting methods. Therefore he is, “combining just enough stop-and-frisk, with precision policing to fight crime effectively and allow police and communities to envision a better future -- together.” Interestingly, these articles both agree that ‘stop and frisk’ is constitutional, and that it should be used in small quantities so as to be most effective. De Blasio is simply making the point that Donald Trump is wrong about the amount of ‘stop and frisk’, while Giuliani makes the statement that Trump is right about ‘stop and frisk’s
constitutionality. Since these two sources have such similar messages, I agree with both of them. I also believe that Mr. Holt was incorrect when he declared ‘stop and frisk’ unconstitutional, and that Trump is wrong about ‘stop and frisk’ being one of the main solutions to putting a halt on crime. In my opinion, one cannot prove the connections between crime rates and only one specific police technique. I think that ‘stop and frisk’ may not always be the best option, and that it must be used carefully, and only as needed, to aid other crime-fighting strategies. It should not replace or inhibit other crime-fighting techniques. The question of ‘stop and frisk’ is not one of constitutionality, but rather, one of quantity.
Sources:
Giuliani, Rudolph. "Trump Is Right about 'Stop and Frisk.' Lester Holt Should Apologize." Fox News. Fox News / Wall Street Journal, 28 Sept. 2016. Web. 04 Oct. 2016. (-- removed HTML --) .
Blasio, Bill De. "Trump Is Wrong on Stop-and-frisk." CNN. Cable News Network, 28 Sept. 2016. Web. 04 Oct. 2016. (-- removed HTML --) .