Preview

Argumentative Essay: Should The Government Control The United States

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
840 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argumentative Essay: Should The Government Control The United States
Government Control
The United States’ government is taking absolute control of its peoples’ lives by the putting others at risk of danger, invasion of privacy and dictating what they can consume. The government is controlling the United States with the use of drones, the internet, and food.
The use of drones that the government controls is invading civilians’ privacy and is dangerous. “While manufacturers and operators insist that drones are precise and pinpoint accurate, researchers have documented hundreds of civilian deaths in drone strikes - and there are likely to be many more.” (Drone Wars). It is sad to say that not very many Americans know that these types of things go on, because the US military is not going to openly say that public
…show more content…
More than half of Americans have no idea what they are actually putting in their body, unless they grow the food themselves. The government has not even enforced that all foods must have GMO labeling. Some of the ingredients that are in the food we purchase, are not even labeled. But, in other countries they have warning labels on some of the food to be purchased. Not only is food labeling an issue, but also the restriction of portion size. If somebody wants to order a large coke, they should be allowed to. They will have to face whatever consequences later on down the road. “Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s ham-handed attempt to ban large sodas earned him scorn from Jon Stewart and the New York Times editorial board. It also forced a broad coalition of unions, soda makers, restaurants, and minority businesses to sue to overturn the ban. Nevertheless, Bloomberg’s successor, Bill DeBlasio has vowed to forge ahead with the soda ban.” (Linnekin). The people of America should have the free will to choose and do as they please. The effects of getting a large soda or anything considered unhealthy affects them, not the government. Besides, someone could easily order two medium sized sodas for themselves rather than one large soda. The government cannot control the peoples’ food

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Drone Warfare, enacted by George Bush and expanded on by President Obama to provide a haven for Americans against the terrorist group, al-Qaeda. The use of weaponized unmanned surveillance drones allowed for far better independent targeting decisions, rather than retrieving intelligence from sources within the real country where the warfare would take place. These strategic implications created a question among Americans, is the use of drones to target individuals right? This question has arisen due to a high number of civilian casualties, making it seem inhumane to do. However, Kenneth Anderson provides readers a strong argument as to why drone warfare is strategically effective in his article, “The Case for Drones” with his organization pattern,…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Soda’s a Problem but…” Karin Klein distinguishes the government’s issue, “But the mayor’s initiative goes further than something like a soda tax... Bloomberg is playing nanny in the worst sort of way…”(Karin Klein, 289). Simply put, the author explains how the government is overseeing people’s lives and the choices they can make. The government is making decisions by themselves, without the people’s consent! Basically, the limitations on sugary drinks is unacceptable and should be…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Drone Strikes are popular tools of all countries, especially the United States, seeking to neutralize suspected terrorists. Even though the American public is divided on the issue and the Pakistani public, where U.S. drones have been used the most, is sternly against the use of drones, they remain the weapon of choice for our military. This started with the Bush Administration in the early 2000s, the U.S. government has attacked hundreds of targets in northwestern Pakistan alone. Regardless of the moral or ethical questions, drone strikes…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jones Dbq Analysis

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    With that said, I can understand why some people are fooled into thinking these drones can flip identities and be helpful in the case of military operations. Michael V. Hayden, a writer for the New York Times, shares a logical view with an illogical reasoning. He confesses that, “The program is not perfect. No military program is. But here is the bottom line: It works. I think it fair to say that the targeted killing program has been the most precise and effective application of firepower in the history of armed conflict,” (Doc E). While his statement makes sense and even persuades the primarily gullible American population that drones are similar to humans, he fails to express the larger and more impactful picture. Yes, when staring at today with our tunnel vision glasses on, the drone system of military attacks “works”. What all of us have failed to realize and accept is the long term outcome of the extended use of these killing machines because they “work” now. From Hayden’s statement, humans are guilted into thinking that drones are similar to us, not perfect but showing immediate results and improvement; what they are missing is the information of the drone attacks that kill thousands of innocent people. Document D tells the story of a family who had children take hits from…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main concern involving surveillance by drones is the curiousness of who is on the other side. For example, in the article “Drone Home,” Lev Grossman points out the major questions and concerns’ that comes to mind when being watched by drones. He states that “you’re dealing with someone who is both present and absent, who has decided that what they say or do will have consequences for you but not for them” (Grossman 31). In this one sentence Grossman discusses the major issue and concern involving the entrance of drones into the society. This statement made by the author points out the helplessness that people face when being watched by devices like drones with no hint of who is on the other…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our phone calls, computer's browsing histories, social security, and zip code numbers are accessible by the government. Cameras record us on the daily, spying on our routines. Always being monitored…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drones can cause people to become terrorist. The people becoming terrorist most likely have had a loved one either die or be injured from a drone attack. As Amnesty International said, ”drone strikes can be classified as “war crimes” or illegal “extrajudicial executions.’” (Source K 9) Drones may also not hit the right target either, but drones are not meant to hit each and every target spot on. The people controlling the drones are not perfect and are allowed…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sugar Nation Controversy

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages

    “How far should the Government go to protect us from ourselves?” (Huffingtonpost.com). That is a question some New Yorkers have been asking themselves since September 13th, 2012, when the New York City board of public health officially put into effect a ban of selling sugary, soft drinks over 16 ounces (about half a liter). This soda ban has divided the city separating residents into two distinct views. Will this new ban benefit New York City and create yet another stepping stone against the obesity epidemic, or is it an unnecessary abuse of power by the government, that is unfair to big corporations and businesses?…

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The government regulation of people's dieting is wrong, they are collectivism. This is not right, everyone is not the same. It absurd to make people stop drinking what they want and what they want to eat. They are trying to become a dystopia state, the government is trying to control everything that a person is doing. Is not their chose to tell people to lose weight. I'm guessing they know what they are doing. Banning sodas and putting how many calories the food has is not really going to change their option. The government is making it seem like everyone need to lose weight. Who do they think they are, by telling and banning candy machines and soda from people. Plus, if you break that rule, they will have to pay $200. They are exaggerating with the power they have.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drones are starting to appear everywhere in today’s society, whether it be for commercial use or governmental use. Having this new found technology leads to the matter of the limitations of the usage of a drone, as in air safety, privacy of the people, and security. The consensus says that drones are for the better because of their diverseness and mobility. Although the argument has been made that drones will lead to a less private lifestyle and that the government will be able to track citizens and watch their every move. Drones should be sold to the public but regulated by the government because they are extremely mobile and they are reliable.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Ethics of Drone Warfare

    • 1547 Words
    • 45 Pages

    Eleven years ago, the United States Air Force launched a missile from a drone for the first time at a test range in the Nevada desert (Drone Test) . The use of armed drones has risen dramatically since 2009. Now drone strikes are almost a daily occurrence. In 2011 the use of drones continued to rise with strikes in (Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Libya, Somalia. Proponents of armed drones argue that their ability to watch and wait, with their highly accurate sensors and cameras gives increased control over when and where to strike its both increasing the chances of success and minimising the harm to civilians. Lt. Gen. David A. Deptula is the first Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance, Deptula contends that “the precision, the persistence, and the accuracy that remotely piloted aircraft bring to the equation actually enhance our ability to accomplish our objectives while minimizing loss of life”. There are good reasons for using more drones. Cruise missiles and jet fighters work against fixed targets, concentrations of forces or heavy weapons on open ground. They are not as useful, however, in today's “wars among the people” fought against insurgents and terrorists. Drones such as the Predator and the Reaper can loiter, maintaining what one former CIA director described as an “unblinking stare” over a chosen area for up to 18 hours. Edward Barrett is director of strategy and research at the US Naval Academy’s Stockdale Center for Ethical Leadership. He says “If you believe that a society has a duty to reduce unnecessary risk to its combatants, then these systems do that, so that would be actually one moral obligation, and then also the state has an obligation to effectively and efficiently defend its citizens, and these systems are effective and efficient. A soldier in the…

    • 1547 Words
    • 45 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    While drones contain the advanced technology to guarantee the target will be annihilated, they cannot ensure that bystanders will not be harmed. For instance, in November of 2015, the US targeted 41 Taliban men and unfortunately 1,147 civilians were also killed in the drone strike. Residents in Pakistan, and other drone monitored countries constantly live in fear of when the next drone strike could occur. Additionally, between January 2009 and at the end of 2015, the United States government stated that between 64 and 116 non-combatants were devastatingly killed in a drone strike which only targeted one terrorist. The major opponents against drone usage, Economists, argue that if the family of a Pakistani man died in the midst of a drone strike, he may seek justice on the United States. Moreover, the father and husband of the deceased family could join the Taliban to plot his revenge against our country, therefore creating an additional terrorist fighting against the United…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pillars of Society

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The government has complete control over all aspects of our lives. They control from food, housing, imports, exports the whole mighty dollar. The government has put the United States in debt and put more American’s on the street with a failing economy. Inflation has hit many of us, currently gas is $4.09 people are no longer being able to afford to drive their vehicles. I have an Avalanche and it cost me nearly $100+ dollars to fill up. I can remember when we paid $1.98. The government controls petroleum and chooses not to dig in our own back yards but in foreign countries.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is America still the land of the free or is it just for some people?…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    At one point in everyone's life they have felt that they were being watched. Now that feeling may not be just a feeling anymore. The government uses aircraft drones to video and take pictures of other countries to spy on them. Although, the government has started using these drones and other spying devices to watch the United States as well. One day, you may observe a miniature helicopter with cameras or a small plane looking upon the houses of this country’s citizens houses. There is a very good use for these drones as well, “Police departments in Texas, Florida and Minnesota have already expressed interest in the technology's potential to detect fugitives on rooftops or to track them at night by using the robotic aircraft's heat-seeking cameras” (Reporter). The police have already started using helicopter drones to help search for suspects and criminals. The use of drones in residential areas needs to be limited to the use of police to find criminals that have been sited or thought to have been in that area. The fact that using these drones is helping the police find criminals is good, but spying on the innocent people of the suburbs is an invasion of privacy and unneeded. During the event that the government starts spying on residence for no reason is when these drones become misused. “FBI director Robert Mueller told congress the agency owns several drones but has not yet formed policies or guidelines on their use. Confirmation that the U.S. is using the surveillance equipment to monitor its own citizens comes after the NSA phone tracking scandal rocked trust in the government” (Jerreat). The head of the FBI has admitted using drones to spy on U.S. citizens very solemnly but after the NSA tracking citizens cell phones without any kind of permission makes it very hard for people to trust anything that the government says. Drones being used violates the fourth amendment because of search and seizure. There is also a chance that these drones could be hacked and…

    • 1675 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays