Arguments Against Terrorist Attacks

In the world of peace and liberty, the United States faced a huge burden of terrorism threat. The government administration and the law enforcement agents fight everyday to secure and protect the citizen of the United States against religious activist groups and other groups of terrorism such as: al Qaeda, ISIS, Islamic States,...etc. So, the government had established a counter-terrorism program to secure U.S. soil from terrorism threat, and to identify any threat before it occurred in the United States. This counterterrorism program came along with more restrictions on the population to prevent terrorist attacks in United States. Some of these restrictions on people have raised concern about privacy and civil liberties of U.S citizens or in somehow get into the way of personal information and liberty. But, the question we need to ask ourselves is: Should we have more restriction on people to prevent terrorist attacks in United States even though it interfered with privacy and civil liberties?
According to the article called “Paris Attacks Kill more than 100, Police say; Border Controls
Because the government responsibility is to secure and protect its citizens from any threat. In order to do this jobs, the government will have to bend certain rules about the privacy and civil liberty because terrorists get mingled with people. So, the only way to get information about terrorists attacks before they occur, is to have access to people privacy, but they should not used those informations for other cases such as. I think that sometime it is essential to break law in order to do good things. Now, the question we need to ask ourselves is: Are we willing to be target in the United States without breaking certain rule about privacy? I think that security can first before any privacy because no one is willing to leave in