In the article Women in Combat: Let’s get Real, written by Margaret Wente (2013), the main idea is that women cannot equal men in ground combat. The author uses a logos approach to defend her main idea statement which I believe is effective because she supports her arguments with a variety of facts from different sources. Margaret Wente (2013) argues that “the issue is that the physical differences between men and women are very large, and on the battle field, they really matter, and can’t be wished away” (Paragraph 3). In this argument the author is saying that the physical gap between men and women is too large to be overlooked. The author uses evidence from Stephanie Gutman which states “the average female soldier is about five inches shorter…
Women have been allowed to have many jobs but should they be allowed to go to war? According to Rebecca Zissou on the Women Warriors article, a publication that talks about women combatants. “they aren't allowed to compete for a spot in the regiment because they are women”. This, of course, should be an issue when it comes down to these situations. The women should be treated the same way as a man. When it comes to these situations women are not treated equally as men, when that shouldn't happen for one reason. The reason is that women have the same rights as men. Women should be able to apply themselves to any job/career they want. Why remove those rights when it comes to women warriors?…
The rationale of this bibliography is to find sources of information on the role of women in the military and their role in combat. The bibliography looks at sources that are against having women in combat roles, sources that advocate women playing combat roles. The bibliography also looks at the performance of the women that have had combat roles and the challenges they have faced.…
Women should be able to fight in battle. I mean why shouldn’t they? Men fight in battle, why can’t women fight? Women could be just as strong and as fast as a man in battle. There are some women today and throughout history that have gone to the battlefield in secret.…
Being that I am a woman who loves to compete with the guys now I can elaborate on why I think woman should be able to serve in some combat positions. I feel as if women can deploy to Afghanistan and Iraq into those combat zones than why shouldn’t they be able to pursue combat positions? Now, as far as women being placed into a combat unit I don’t think they should…
If any of you have a family member in the US Army or the Navy, I'm sure you're very proud of them, protecting and serving this nation we call home. I wonder who has a family member that has a woman in the Army or war. But I guess that that's a problem. A lot of people would argue against women in combat. Women should be allowed in combat because men and women are equal as is everyone else, they have the right to serve and protect our nation just as much as men do, and any woman is capable to do so.…
The idea that women should not go into combat is slowly being changed. In an article from The San Diego Union Tribune author Gretel Kovach states that Marine Corps are planning to open ground combat jobs to women for there might be some benefits (Kovach). The Marine Corps are one of the toughest American military branches and…
Everyone works extraordinarily courageous when danger is experience. Women are not left out. They work as hard to ensure they achieve what is required of them. No gender is designed for courageous acts to be in the military solely. Women and men can work hand in hand to fight the battles and emerge victorious. Women have been restricted from artillery, infantry, armor and other combat roles in specialty. They are recruited to perform administrative work, nurse the ill and wounded, do laundry and cook for the troops. I strongly disagree with the person who came up with this plan. Women should be allowed in the army not to cook but to serve as their male counterparts since no gender is better suited for some jobs and careers (Lianas…
Women military combat women should not be subject to what happens in war combat. women are built different women are more qualified parents then man men would try to take care of the women and protect them help them and save them they women would have to have different sleeping quarters and different bathing areas then the men that’s more money army navy marines and air force women would have to work hard like the men and women structure aren’t meant for some of that work “It is said that this will allow women to fill hundreds of thousands of combat roles from which they are currently excluded. Substantively, this is a poor idea” (cnn, 1).…
There have been exceptions to the tradition of keeping women out of combat roles which have been mostly out of necessity. World War II saw a very large need for additional people to be placed under arms. Japan and Russia utilized women to supplement ground combat troops after horrendous losses took a toll on their fielded armies. The U.S. saw it fit to utilize women as ferry pilots flying military aircraft from factories to forward operating locations where they would be taken over by men (Myre, 2013). The U.S. Military put women to work in various forms of defense industry during the war years regressing back to old ways after the Axis powers were vanquished. It’s been proven over the course of the 20th Century that BFOQ in the military by only allowing men into direct combat roles is an antiquated practice. The historic evidence of continued performance of women in these roles proves BFOQ in the military does not…
Women with combat roles will cause issues with in the military and out. Mcgregor said, “Yes, putting women in combat roles beyond those that have been recently formalized would require many adjustments, both logistical and psychological, for the military and for its male troops” Men having to adjust for women to be in combat by logistical and psychological help is an eye opener for how crucial it is to change gender roles.…
Although female soldiers have recently been allowed to take jobs in previously all-male battalions, over 250,000 combat jobs still remain closed to them. Some argue that this unfairly limits career growth, while others contend that women are not able to withstand the physical and psychological nature of combat. Do you think that women should be able to serve in combat positions? Why or why not?…
This argument makes sense because the physical side of women are lower than man. In basic training the standards of physical fitness have been set to suit men, and women attempting to reach them will over-stretch themselves. Also there is a factor of enemy abuse while both male and females are at risk of torture and rape, but misogynistic societies may be more willing to abuse women prisoners. However women have proven to be a good support in the combat system with morale, tradition and mission effectiveness. In the end there are more positives than negatives for women being allowed to serve in the combat…
There are many new occupations for women in the military, which will directly lead to women fighting in many combatant positions. Under the 1994 Pentagon policy, women were prohibited from being assigned to ground combat units below brigade level. Former US Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, lifted the rule that restricted women from combat units. The DoD goal is to open about 237,000 positions to women by 2016. Right now there is a plan to validate a gender neutral physical standard that will enable the selection of the those best qualified for combat related positions and may reduce non-combat related injuries for both men and women (Lt. Col Platt 2013). So what’s the big deal? There haven’t been any problems in the last almost 238 years for the US Army. Why is it such a problem now?…
In 2013, the Secretary of Defense removed the ban on women in combat. There have been many debates leading up to and even after the decision. I agree that women should be in combat. I don’t think that it is fair to deny someone their dream because of their gender. It also allows for the combat force to be more diverse and ready to handle all types of situations. These situations need social skills in which women may be better skilled. Recognizing this important difference provides armed forces with a comprehensive force that can solve conflicts swiftly and successfully. The women help meet the needs of a volunteer based force. Many of the higher positions require combat experience. Women should be allowed in combat if that is where their passion leads them without fear of harassment or assault.…