Work Cited
Metaphysics. Trans. Hugh Tredennick. 2
Cited: Metaphysics. Trans. Hugh Tredennick. 2 vols. Loeb Classical Library 271, 287. Harvard U. -Press, 1933-35
(Note: The process of the Scientific Method is outlined well in the lecture found at Classroom>Canyon Connect>Module 1 Readings>. You can also find the process of the Scientific Method in Chapter 1 of your textbook as well as at the References listed at the end of this document.…
An extensive component of a philosopher’s thoughts is definition. Yet what is definition but merely man’s attempt at using words to describe another word? This creates an endless process of attempting to find the definition of a word and then the definition of each word in the first definition. However, Aristotle developed definitions of numerous words in an attempt to create an organized structure or method of arranging organisms into something called taxonomy. The…
Few have had as much of an influence in as many fields of thought as Aristotle has. Plato’s pupil and consequently Alexander’s mentor, possibly the first polymath, the ripples of the Macedonian’s teachings are still being felt all across the world and formed the basis for Western culture for over a millennia until the arrival of the Scientific Revolution. Following from this, in this essay one will explore into Aristotle’s views on tragedy and final causation and comprehend how these can be applied to the movie Blade Runner. Aristotle, in his Metaphysics, laid the ground down for his theories of substance, of which the most important and influential one would be the final cause, or telos. This theory provided an explanation to the natural position of each…
Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics provides a sensible account for what true moral virtue is and how one may go about attaining it. Aristotle covers many topics that help reach this conclusion. One of them being the idea of mean between the extremes. Although Aristotle provided a reliable account for many philosophers to follow, Rosalind Hursthouse along with many others finds lose ends and topics which can be easily misinterpreted in Aristotle's writing.…
Overall, I agree with Aristotle when he says that having a good moral character and establishing credibility is an important part of being successful in persuasive speaking. I believe that if someone is passionate and knowledgeable about the topic they are discussing they would be able to establish credibility with their audience. I also agree when Aristotle says that credibility needs to be earned during the speech. However, it would be challenging for a speaker who in the past has been known to not be a credible source for information to change the views of an audience who already has bad judgement of him or her. In vice versa a speaker who has been credible in the past would not have as hard of a time convincing an audience of his credibility.…
“We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.” This just one of Aristotle’s famous quotes and is probably the most important of them all. Excellence isn’t an act it’s just a habit something you just do without thinking about the thing you’re excellent at. In the Leaving a Legacy unit, many social and historical movements, as well as people and legacies, have been explored. Some of these people are still going on or have left a legacy worth learning about, one of which is Aristotle. Aristotle is a Greek philosopher who is the icon of western philosophy who started out as a student of Plato to one of the most iconic philosophers ever.…
A married couple, both addicted to drugs, is unable to care for their infant daughter. She is taken from them by court order and placed in a foster home. The years passed. She comes to regard her foster parents as her real parents. They love her as they would their own daughter. When the child is 9 years old, the natural parents, rehabilitated from drugs, begin court action to regain custody. The case is decided in their favor. The child is returned to them, against her will. Do ethics support the law in this case? Discuss.…
himself, yet in reality he was not. So I then tried to show him that he thought…
The statement argues that Aristotle’s theory of the four causes is impossible to apply to everyday life and cannot be applied to the real world. Aristotle believed there are four causes that determine what things are and their purpose and claims this is how we differentiate one thing from another. These four causes are known as the material cause, the efficient cause, the formal cause and most importantly for Aristotle, the final cause, and these together describe how ‘things’ transform from the state of actuality to potentiality. To some extent the theory of the four causes could be accurate and plausible, however, some of the ideas behind it is flawed and unrealistic. In this essay I will cover the three main faults of Aristotle’s theory. Namely, its lack of clarity, that the theory is based on assumptions and that there is no evidence to support the existence of the prime mover.…
Question 2) In Book I of Republic, Thrasymachos’s states that unjust people are stronger and more powerful than just people. Thrasymachos believes that being just is not virtuous nor wise but that men act just only because they afraid of having injustices happening to them so they obey. Those who have power and control are those people who act unjust-they make laws and rules that benefit themselves, not the rest of the people. Socrates proves Thrasymachos otherwise by arguing that being just is virtuous, wise and profitable and being unjust does not make people stronger nor more powerful. Those in power or rulers make laws that are just for themselves but Thrasymachos agrees that sometimes rulers make mistakes and make laws that are unjust to them, therefore, making them just or advantageous for the people they rule. Therefore, unjust people would not be more powerful in this case. Additionally, Socrates goes on to reason with Thrasymachos that the individual in power commands advantages for his or her subject rather than their own personal advantage. Socrates makes a comparison to a doctor and a patient as well as a pilot and a sailor, where the doctor and pilot are commanding advantages for their subjects, the patient and sailor respectively. Thrasymachos argues that a just man will pay taxes on his estate and an unjust man will pay less taxes on the same size property, etc. Therefore, being unjust serves a greater purpose than being just. Socrates goes on to argue that no one chooses willingly to rule but they do so in exchange for wages because the ruler does not expect to make other gains in simply doing what is advantageous for the people being ruled. Work performed by people in power and in control is considered an art form that without being rewarded with wages solely serves that subject, or weaker person, receiving the benefit of the art. For example, a doctor practices the art of making others healthy. There are no advantages the doctor gains in…
Both Buddhism and Aristotle present intriguing philosophies; Buddhism promotes gratitude and suffering. Buddhists believe that happiness is not achieved by wealth, prestige, and luxury. Happiness is achieved by understanding the teachings of Buddhism and achieving nirvnana, which means to free the soul from bad Karma. On the other hand, Aristotle felt that Eudaimonia (happiness) was only achievable by fulfilling one’s full potential. In other words, happiness comes from long term success.…
The Euthyphro dialogue is essentially a conversation between Socrates and Euthyphro each of who attempt to argue their point of justification about why they are in court or should not be there, which in turn a question develops about the gods and holiness.…
The accusers, Meletos, Anytos, and Lycon, are all young and trying to make a name for themselves. They begin by telling everyone not to be deceived and to take caution because Socrates is a “clever speaker”. According to Socrates, the difference between him and his accusers is that he speaks the truth. He is on trial for two items, which include, corrupting the youth and impiety. Socrates tells everyone that he has no experience with the court and he will speak the way he is used to by being honest and direct. Socrates explains that his behavior is from the oracle of Apollo at Delphi.…
Although over 2000 years old, the use of Greek Philosopher Aristotle’s Modes of Artistic Proofs have proved relevant still in todays society and are recognised as key elements in the art of persuasion. The three techniques comprise of Ethos – the ability to display the “persuasive potential of the speaker’s character or credibility” (Herrick, 1997), Pathos – the emotional appeals to put the audience in the correct frame of mind and Logos, which tends to appeal to the audience’s sense of logical reasoning through the use of factual evidence (Herrick, 1997). All, if used in the correct manner, can have enormous impacts on the overall success of an argument, potentially swaying an audience to be synonymous with the speaker’s ideas.…
What is a good argument? Aristotle’s was the first person to have a formal theory for argument. He states that an argument is “When, certain things being so, something else results from these by their being so (either generally or for the most part) – there (in the Topics) this is called deduction, here it is called enthymeme” (Rhetoric I.2, 1356b16–18). It’s very interesting how Aristotle’s saw an argument from very different ways. In my opinion an argument is just the view of things from different perspective. I can’t understand how he can relate many words and concepts to this simple word. As Dr. King ask in lecture, what is a good argument? Is the big question. He combined fallacies, validity and induction to create a good…