Preview

Article Rebuttal: The Pebble Mine

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
609 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Article Rebuttal: The Pebble Mine
Article Rebuttal: The Pebble Mine
Daisy Chiskok
BCOM/275
February 18, 2013
Rhonda Waters

Tour opened mind to Pebble Mine I visited the site of the proposed Pebble Mine last week. Like many Alaskans, I had misgivings about the wisdom of a large-scale mine being developed in the middle of one of the World’s great fisheries. So it was with a fair amount of skepticism that I approached this tour. The presentation that opened the tour contained a history of the exploration, area geology and an explanation of how deposits of this nature is usually mined. The care with which the explanation phase of the mine has been conducted is extra ordinary. There is virtually no trace of where the first core samples were drilled. The dreaded “trailing’s pond” is just a containment area where discarded rock is stored after the ore has been removed. It’s covered with a shallow layer of water to prevent acidification. I believe that the mine and the fishery can coexist.
(Haggard, 2011)

FACT
As a Yupik Eskimo from a rural area of Alaska, I have reasons to disagree with Carolyn Haggard of Wasilla and her statement of: “I believe that the mine and the fishery can coexist.” I strongly believe that one of Alaska’s most valuable resource- wild salmon, will, no doubt, be contaminated from the effects of the Pebble Mine in operation. 1) We know that according to latest estimates, Pebble Mine will generate some 10 billion tons of waste, laced with toxic byproducts of the mining process. 2) We know that it will be located at the head of the pristine watershed that feeds Bristal Bay, near the largest fresh water lake in all Alaska. 3) We know that the Bristal Bay watershed sustains one of the most productive fisheries in the world – Alaska’s wild salmon fishery – and that the fishery generates over $400 million each year. 4) We know that large mines leak-during or after their operation-and that copper, in even minute increases above natural levels (several



References: Haggard, C. (2011, Oct 08). Retrieved from Anchorage Daily News. Reynolds, J. (2010, June 29). Curbing Polution, saving wildlife and wild places. Retrieved from Switch Board-NRDC. The Pebble Partnership. (2012, July 26). PLP News Release.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Icicle Seafoods Case Study

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Should the state of Washington allow Icicle Seafoods to establish a net-pen salmon aquaculture operation in the Straits of Juan de Fuca, just off the coast near Port Angeles?…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I strongly disagree with the building of Polymet mining in Hoyt Lakes for the very large amount of pollution that is caused, the tremendously high cost of fixing a polluted mine, and a very, very bad track record. The Polymet mine will cause so much pollution such as the sulfuric acid drainage: sulfide + H20 + O2. If this is to be leaked into the rivers it can cause toxicity to marine life. The Polymet Mine my also cause pit walls, waste rocks piles, tailings basin, and even heavy metal contaminants which will cause a lot of damage to marine life and life on land. The second point is that Polymet has a very bad track record. The financial and environmental statistics are dismal. Pollution is not always predictable. One hundred…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Carl Safina’s writings of Song for the Blue Ocean, he reflects on his and others take on what is currently going on to the salmon across the Northwest. As you can clearly see from his writing he truly admires this animal and so do many of the people he introduces us to. He shares with us the ridicule’s many industries, whom are harming the salmon have laid plainly before us and we fall for without any second thought.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Alaskan National Wilderness Refuge has been the topic of political debate for decades. A large, beautiful piece of the world, ANWR as it is often referred to, is not a only a refuge for hundreds of species of birds, fish and mammals, but also a political battleground that is used to ignite the debate on America’s dependence on foreign fuel sources. The possibility of drilling for oil in ANWR brings with it the promise of jobs, dependency from unstable countries for our fuel needs and a boost to our declining economy. However, drilling in this land also brings the possibility of destroying the habitat of birds that migrate to this area yearly, caribou that use this haven as a calving ground, fish that fill the rivers and lakes, as well as grizzly bears, wolves, elk and hundreds of other species that depend on this habitat for food, shelter and safety. There is no debate that there are passionate debates, important facts and amazing possibilities that concern both sides of this argument. And even if it were possible to remove political agenda from the table, it would still be a very difficult debate to win for either side. My hopes are to come to a conclusion that would benefit both parties involved. I strongly feel that any drilling in this area would be detrimental to the surrounding area, as well as bring possible harm to the countless animals, birds and fish that use this safe haven yearly for migration, calving and egg laying and feeding. The decision to either drill or not to drill may not have a direct impact on us now, but in the years to come, good or bad, we will all see the changes that this decision will have resulted in.…

    • 2026 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    ANWR

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In voting poles, over 75 percent of Alaskans favor exploration and oil production in ANWR. Even the local people, the Inupiat Eskimos, support onshore oil development on the Coastal Plain.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Quapaw Nation Summary

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Narrator Four: Dozens of mining companies and hundreds of miners came to live in the surrounding areas to extract zinc, iron and lead from the mines. They dug deep into mother earth and left all of the left over remains in huge mountains of…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I have recently become aware of the possibility of fracking on the North Slope, and I…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In recent discussions of drilling in the arctic national refuge, a controversial issue has been whether to drill or not to drill. On the one hand, some argue that drilling for oil can bring many benefits both economically and politically to America, it creates jobs and makes us less dependent on foreign oil. Also in the last two decades their have been many laws to improve the drilling, transport and clean up of oil. We as Americans have a comfortable lifestyle. A large part of which comes from using natural resources. There are a lot of reasons why earth conscious people would want to prevent oil drilling in an area that is protected called The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Spills are probably the first thing on anyone’s mind when they talk about oil drilling and transportation. So why would anyone, besides greedy, millionaire oil company executives, want to drill and transport oil? Drilling for oil can bring many benefits, both economically and politically, to America. It creates jobs and can make us less dependent on foreign oil. Also, in the last two decades there have been many laws and reforms to improve the drilling, transport, and cleanup of oil. These insure a greatly reduce possibility of harmful contamination to the Earth as a whole.…

    • 4979 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is an interesting idea. However, I had trouble identifying the damaging activity. For your project, are the listed harms only limited to those caused by vibrations – or does it also encompass harms caused sediment debris caused by mining activity and pollution from leaks. If you would like to include another issue caused by Phosphate Drilling, perhaps you could search for more scientific information.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my opinion drilling shouldn't be Allow in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge because it is more of an environmental issue. Due to the fact that oil and gas exploration and development in the (ANWR) would have a major effect on the water resource. It is most concerning because it’s a factor that contributes, negatively towards a wide variety of species that are inhabitant of that particular area that are being affected by limited resource of water that they need for their survival. The reason drilling is an issue because it can alter the character of an ecosystem. For example Arctic ecosystem is characterized by many complex interactions, and changes to one component may have secondary but significant effects on other ecosystem components. Which means oil exploration and development have substantially changed environments where they have occurred in Alaska’s central Arctic. Another reason drill is an issue because of factor that comes into play when drilling occurs such as oil spills, contaminated waste, and other sources of pollution have had measurable impacts on an environment. Like the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska and the more recent Deep-water Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico. These disasters have displayed that there is no safe way to drill for oil and gas in the Arctic refuge, no way to guarantee wildlife will not be harmed by resource extraction in the refuge and no way to ensure the Arctic refuge will be protected for future generations and if Congress allows oil and gas exploration on the coastal plain there are costly consequences that wildlife have to endure. Oil drilling presents a potential risk of oil spills; in the Arctic the impacts of such spills could be catastrophic. Spills are more dangerous here because the combination of a colder climate, slower plant growth rates and longer animal life spans hinder recovery efforts. Additionally, no technology currently…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Beginning in 1941, Scanlan's reports of "excessive coal dust" in the Centralia No. 5 mine were sent to Robert Medill, the Director of the Department of Mines and Minerals, and handled as "routine" by Robert Weir, the Assistant to the Director. All three positions were appointed by the Governor, Dwight H. Green. Also in 1941, the U.S. Bureau of Mines began making inspections of mines. The first inspection of Centralia No. 5 was in September 1942. However, only the State of Illinois had any power to enforce compliance, and reports from the Bureau there¬fore had primary significance as further documentation in the hands of the Department of Mines and…

    • 1166 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This area is a miner’s wonderland with almost every natural resource known to the earth. Here, oil has replaced gold as the most hunted after resource. Other important mineral findings in southeastern Alaska include copper, silver, mercury, tin, platinum, coal, iron ore, borax, chromite, antimony, tungsten, nickel, molybdenum, sand, gravel, and limestone. It is estimated that Alaska has about 120 billion tons of coal. Coal is found mostly throughout much of Alaska with giant deposits in the Matanuska, Nenana, and Bering River coalfields in the interior of Southeastern Alaska. The Brooks Range also contains sufficient deposits of coal as…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “What Development of Alaska’s Arctic Coastal Plain Means to Louisiana.” ANWR.org 2008. Frontier Communications. 19 Oct. 2008. .…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Firstly, the Gahcho Kue mine is great for the economy as the mining industry provides $57 billion dollars to Canada’s GDP and Canada makes a lot of money trading mined goods, since 80% of all mined goods are exported. Also, De Beers donates $71 billion dollars/year towards taxes, therefore helping Canada economically. Socially, about 33 first nation’s communities have been affected by mining as the air and water is polluted. As well, since many animals are at risk of losing their habitat or going extinct, it affects the hunting that the first nations do for food and other uses. Lastly, the environment is threatened, since the Gahcho Kue mine is located near the Kennedy Lake, De Beers is planning on draining 870 hectares of water for mining, affecting the vegetation and ecosystems living in the lake. On top of that, the caribou migration is affected as a winter access road system is being built, making caribou vulnerable to accidents and other accidents, which can eventually lead to their extinction. In conclusion, the Gahcho Kue mine will help the economy, but will have negative impacts socially and…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Offshore Oil Drilling

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Offshore oil drilling is slowly destroying our environment. Over the past few years following the tragic oil spill in the gulf,…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays