Artists Should Not Be Used In Advertising In The Music World

In the music world, many artists will promote a product that will advertise their music. This can affect the artist positively and negatively. For some artists though, promoting a product that will advertise their music will help the artist grow and become popular. However, almost always the artists’ image is destroyed. Artists use a variety of ways to sell and promote their music, but using their music to promote a product in advertising has affected them the most, and not in a positive way. Advertising causes stress on the artist and it also ruins their image. Given these points, artists music should not be used in advertising because of the consequences it has on them. For starters, artists already have enough stress to deal with when just creating music in general. They have to creating albums, make record deals, and more. When artists advertise for a company, that adds on more stress. For example, as it says in the source “Selling Out Not Worth the Risk”, “…He or she has a responsibility to represent the company and help sell its products. This can be tremendously stressful for artists…”. Not only do artists have to create music that is “appealing to
When artists take on endorsements for a company, it leads fans to believe the artist has lost their uniqueness, which ruins their image. To add on, artists also lose control over where their music is used. As it states in “Selling Out Not Worth the Risk”, “Neil Young, an artist known for his politically charged lyrics, expressed disappointment when his music was used by a U.S. presidential candidate without his permission, saying that he would not have allowed the candidate to use the song had he been asked.”. Fans felt like they couldn’t connect with him anymore, they felt betrayed. It ruined his unique image and affected his popularity as an artist all due to advertising. Given these points, music in advertising can destroy an artist’s image and